- 3,272
- 2,608
I see. So I need to go kidnap Akira Toriyama to get this fixed.Something something lack of evidence it contains the timelines and that the person sized crystals aren't just ways to see and interact with them, or something like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see. So I need to go kidnap Akira Toriyama to get this fixed.Something something lack of evidence it contains the timelines and that the person sized crystals aren't just ways to see and interact with them, or something like that.
"My series has timelines?"I see. So I need to go kidnap Akira Toriyama to get this fixed.
The joke doesn't really work when Future Trunks is such a important plot point."Dragonball has timelines?"
Yes, ask to Koyama is outdatedI see. So I need to go kidnap Akira Toriyama to get this fixed.
"Does Dragon Ball has an infinite dimensional Hilbert Space?""My series has timelines?"
DB canon to DBH, but not the other way aroundis dbh canon to db
Because the story is bad guy time traveler is messing with the Canon events and altering history, stop them. With constant updates that includes Super and GT content as well.is there like a blog that explains why its canon
not that i disagree w it
"My series has timelines?"
...........i thought this shit was obviously???, ngl, it is like, all DB games expand thing from what Canon have??is there like a blog that explains why its canon
not that i disagree w it
Koyama is related to what DBKoyama isn't related to DB game so it is irrelevant
I feel like the whole "does the crack of time actually contain the multiverse" thing is pretty straightforward, seeing as [something everyone seems to gloss over is] the Crack of Time is literally... verbatim called the space in between dimensions.Which isn't what I asked. I'm asking for the reasoning for the rejection.
Qualitative superiority is being more than infinitely greater than something, which is more akin to viewing something infinite as "zero" rather than simpy finite. You'd need statements for the crack of time like "the concept of space-time is irrelevant here" or "space-time is a non-entity here" or "space-time is an infinitesimal existence here..." you get the idea. There are other ways to prove QS like uncountably infinite universes or Infinity*2-A structure being irrelevant (I think we used an argument that the crack of time contains "non-existent histories," but that's pretty weak, not gonna lie).Q: Is a structure bigger than a 2-A structure Low 1-C by default?
No, the default assumption is that this is not the case. "Bigger" could mean having more 2-A structures and, as explained in greater detail previously, having more 2-A structures, or even infinitely many 2-A structures, unless uncountably infinite many, won't scale above a single 2-A structure in size. This is due to these structures actually have the same size as a baseline 2-A structure. It is, however, possible to at least achieve above the baseline 2-A power by upscaling from other characters who've performed 2-A feats or of the feats themselves, rather than by affecting 2-A structures containing other 2-A structures. However, if "bigger" is indicated to mean a size difference that makes the structure qualitatively superior to a 2-A structure the structure qualifies for Low 1-C unless the fiction specifies otherwise.
To elaborate, a structure larger than 2-A meets the requirements for qualitative superiority over them if it either explicitly mentions an uncountably infinite number of universes or has portrayals/statements of being bigger in size than 2-A structures to the point that even infinite multipliers on top of the size of that structure are of no relevance to it. Multiversal structures past Low 2-C frequently have a distance of unknown length along a 5th dimensional axis separating them. That isn't automatically Low 1-C, as for Low 1-C the distance must be known to be of non-insignificant size.
In that regard it is important to consider that, by its nature, it is not possible to accurately depict 5 dimensional space. As such depictions of the multiverse are usually not to be understood as accurate representation of the distance between the universes, but rather just qualitative analogies of the multiverse's structure.
As usual, evaluation of any additional evidence needs to be done case-by-case.
My brother, Toriyama forgot Dragonball Super was called Dragonball Super.The joke doesn't really work when Future Trunks is such a important plot point.
That marble will be a 1-A construct.Daima will make the universe the size of a marble
No crack of time doesn't have it's own time dimensionIs crack of time a Temporal world with its own personal time axis?
I was of the impression time didn't exist thereIs crack of time a Temporal world with its own personal time axis?
I see, but if it has spacetime, wouldn't that mean there's a higher time dimension further servicing the timelines since the timelines can't be servicing the crack of timeNo crack of time doesn't have it's own time dimension
Even I came to that conclusion before but if I am not wrong c.o.t doesn't have time it was also called a space beyond timeI see, but if it has spacetime, wouldn't that mean there's a higher time dimension further servicing the timelines since the timelines can't be servicing the crack of time
Also why call it the crack of time if it's not a separate time dimension
Even WoV doesn't have time initially but it's still under a time dimension tho, "space beyond time" is hard to quantify as it's saying that it's above time itself, father than lacking itEven I came to that conclusion before but if I am not wrong c.o.t doesn't have time it was also called a space beyond time
but there is no temporal dimension which contains c.o.t you have to prove that first it is only referred as a space not space-timeEven WoV doesn't have time initially but it's still under a time dimension tho, "space beyond time" is hard to quantify as it's saying that it's above time itself, father than lacking it
Has time travel affected the CoT before? Or have time abilities been uses there?
That scan’s never getting accepted on this site, lmao.So how will the DBbros handle the 1-A changes? Because from what I've seen there are some translations of that Afterlife scan that implies a non-dimensional physiology, rather then just a place beyond whatever dimensions exist in the verse.
Is that scan even accepted to be worth anything or am I yapping.
That's why I asked if time travel affects it or if time abilities work there, if either of those things do, then there's clearly time therebut there is no temporal dimension which contains c.o.t you have to prove that first it is only referred as a space not space-time
Afterlife is literally classified as a low 2c realm, no chance on hell it gets anything higher unless explicit proof is givenSo how will the DBbros handle the 1-A changes? Because from what I've seen there are some translations of that Afterlife scan that implies a non-dimensional physiology, rather then just a place beyond whatever dimensions exist in the verse.
Is that scan even accepted to be worth anything or am I yapping.
I think vieth answered thatThat's why I asked if time travel affects it or if time abilities work there, if either of those things do, then there's clearly time there
Hyperbole, poetry, and flowery languageWhy is it not accepted as a dimensionally higher realm, the two statements I read seemed pretty straightforward.