• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

She is again making it all about time direction why is she obsessed with time flowing "diagonally" or some shit we literally can't have a moment of peace didn't dt make it clear it is just one way of getting there
 
H aving two dimensions of time in the physical realm would mean that in addition to being able to go forward and backward in time, you could also move sideways in time onto a different world line, then back sideways to join up again with one's original world line or any other world line in any other universe.
This means that one's sudden appearance on a new world line would occur with no history on that world line, and one's disappearance from it would then result in no future on it either. Occupants of those other universes containing those alternate world lines would also be able to pop into and out of our universe as well.


World lines are just trajectories of objects in space time.

The movement is also defined by the spatial axis within world lines, not the temporal one. The latter just describes the "time".

A world line is a special type of curve in spacetime. Below an equivalent definition will be explained: A world line is a time-like curve in spacetime. Each point of a world line is an event that can be labeled with the time and the spatial position of the object at that time.

See? A complete misunderstanding.
 
Like having to prove a certain flow of time has a specific direction is just ridiculously too specific to reasonably expect most franchises to go out of their way to clarify and display.

Like reading all that, time must move in different directions but if one is moving forward and the other is moving backwards it still doesn't count because black holes exist.

We are tightening the standards to a point where we can apply this sort of skepticism to practically anything.

Like it doesn't matter what the standards are as long as certain verses don't meet them.
 
As long as showing proof of the existence of 2 distinct temporal zones with one being higher is a way of getting 5D, their "direction" obsession means nothing
Essentially yes.

Like having to prove a certain flow of time has a specific direction is just ridiculously too specific to reasonably expect most franchises to go out of their way to clarify and display.

Like reading all that, time must move in different directions but if one is moving forward and the other is moving backwards it still doesn't count because black holes exist.

We are tightening the standards to a point where we can apply this sort of skepticism to practically anything.
Even with physics breaking stuff, Time can still only flow forwards or backwards.

The argument is flawed for yet the same, repetitive reason : Time doesn't have such conception of "directionality" in the first place.

It doesn't have up, down, left, right, diagonal, horizontal, vertical.

Only backwards and forwards. By definition, it cannot be perpendicular.
 
Also perpendicular time dimensions would imply an intersection between the two axes.

Aside from being physically and idealistically inconceivable, what's ironic is that it would not prove tier 1, on the contrary, it would disqualify the timeline from being tier 2 in the first place.

Pein is essentially contradicting standards, that he himself created.
 
Also perpendicular time dimensions would imply an intersection between the two axes.

Aside from being physically and idealistically inconceivable, what's ironic is that it would not prove tier 1, on the contrary, it would disqualify the timeline from being tier 2 in the first place.

Pein is essentially contradicting standards, that he himself created.
Basically,no verse would be tier 2 with that logic.
 
Back
Top