- 1,665
- 1,294
It was always considered immeasurable but outlier, same as the last time it was brought up. If (a very big an unlikely IF) another immeasurable speed feat comes up, that one will most likely be also used as supporting
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
- 12,191
- 6,130
That's if Wiki allows it, if not try to change the rules again.
- 12,191
- 6,130
It is easier to downgrade than to upgrade to infinite or immeasurable speed
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
Looks like the "Saiyan Special" originates in Saikyō Jump Jan. 2018 Issue 1.
If anybody could find it, that'd be great. My sources are dry, though.
- 5,256
- 3,409
There are some scans in Japanese with good quality on the wiki page I linked, in the gallery part.
It's not everything, but take a look.
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
Correction: it was packaged with the issue, as a gift.
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
uhh...
i mean-
- 2,629
- 3,060
I didn't find the raws, but I found it translated to page 64.
Edit: Also, I did find a large resource of scans here. Such as the Kami Explorer Archive of Scans made on Flickr, which, unfortunately, only has Saikyou Jump up 2014.
Edit 2: Also, the technique list of the Super Exciting Guide.
Last edited:
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
My problem is, I can't reliably apply any of the translated material without the raw text and images to verify.
I'd love to use Nam's Cross Arm Dive doubling in strength when used at high altitudes (allegedly), or the Four Witches Technique multiplying the strength of Tien's blows by "several times" (allegedly), but Japanese is a tricky language, and without solid evidence to back up said claims, the information is next to worthless.
- 2,629
- 3,060
Fair. I couldn't find the SEG either, which is surprising, considering-As you said-It's so well utilized on the internet that you'd think everyone has an easy to verify source.
- 6,429
- 2,440
Makes it more exciting
Deleted member 40688
Guest
So goku can predict a. 1 attack in the future?
What calculator yall use for calc?
What calculator yall use for calc?
- 3,304
- 2,117
yeah he can predict attacks in the future
Any standard calculator is fine for a calc
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,062
- 1,768
"Smurfing through time" A Dragon Ball Super upgrade
Good day my fellow dragon ball wankers So as we know in u6 vs u7 arc in dragon ball super the tournament was held in a place call neutral space or dimension in both anime and manga which is a space that holds all the macrocosms So here comes the scaling part hit is able to use his time...
- 2,714
- 3,501
https://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Science/Nuke.html how do i find the yield of an explosion using this site?
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
That calculator only determines the effects of an explosion, given its yield is already known.
((x/0.28)^3) is the formula for the explosive yield of an airblast (in kilotons), using the radius of the explosion in kilometers (x).
For non-nuclear explosions, the yield is halved.
R^3*((27136*P+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2 is the formula for the explosive yield of a ground explosion (in tons), using the radius of the explosion in meters (R) and the overpressure of the shockwave (in bars); the standard is 20 psi or 1.37895 bars.
- 2,714
- 3,501
oh okay I see, thank you
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,241
- 4,064
would Beerus and Champa get 5D if the Neutral zone got an extra temporal dimension?
- 2,714
- 3,501
why?
- 2,714
- 3,501
9.401678449525E17 tons of tnt do you mind giving me the tier for this? And energy value.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,241
- 4,064
their clash was affecting 2 macrocosms which ig could be argued to have "significantly affected" a low 1-C plane
- 2,714
- 3,501
The doesn't mean they were affecting the greater temporal dimension.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,241
- 4,064
not the 6D one
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,062
- 1,768
They were only affecting the space between the universe not the temporal dimension of the neutral zone if it gets accepted
- 2,714
- 3,501
I dont see how this makes them 5D tbh
- 197
- 393
No, because affecting two space-time doesn’t imply affecting the additional dimension that makes them exist in parallel, which in this case is the neutral zone that encompasses the 12 universes. In other words, destroying 2 universes is insignificant for the neutral zone since it will continue to exist.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,241
- 4,064
they have a word for people like you two in Australia
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,241
- 4,064
Debbie Downers smh
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
High 6-A (940.167844952 Petatons of TNT).
What exactly are you calculating?
- 2,714
- 3,501
Sorry, I forgot to convert to meters. Here's the new value if you dont mind. 9.401678449525E26 tons of tnt. Seems to be like large planet level which still seems laughably low. Not sure what i'm doing wrong.
Last edited:
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,822
- 8,657
940.167844953 Yottatons.
- 2,714
- 3,501
I think I see what I did wrong. Ill be back, and btw im calcing the spirit bomb explosion seen from namek with the new namek size.
- 31,399
- 27,689
I'm looking forward to the New Namek CRT. Got my arguments lined up for it.
- 3,229
- 3,560
I'll be waiting to see a whole thread "debunked" because of Bulma (same person who does things that no human being should be capable of, but oh well) .
- 2,714
- 3,501
yeah I bet lmao
- 12,191
- 6,130
I think using arguments based on Bulma doesn't do much good, since she is refuted most of the time.
- 1,967
- 1,664
i think what Hasty is saying that if the Neutral zone is accepted to have its own temporal dimension and it is an insignificant 5D realm that should kinda make it a full fledged low 1-C realm unless you can explain how a 4D temporal axis can service a 5D realm.
- 12,191
- 6,130
It is already accepted that the neutral zone is 5D insignificant, it was just missing evidence, but now that it is there it is smooth.
- 1,967
- 1,664
Similar threads
