how do we know this? legit question btw
........physiology is but branch of biology that deals with the normal functions of living organisms and their parts, aka..........you just agreed with me
yeah, but one is a logical conclusion based on the very mechanics of how aging works.......the other is an unfounded possibility supported by nothing
My theory also uses logic, a functional logic for itself but that does not make it true without facts that support it.
And the internal logic of DB that explains what you claim?
why the multipost for the same post? why not write all in 1 post?
The fact is that you don't understand what I'm trying to imply, it will most likely be lost in the translator.
Because I'm used to Twitter
I trust you, newbie
You can report him, as that is not allowed here.@Robo432343 Would have asked in private but uh, ur profile is limited so.... I'd appreciate if you credited me or just linked my blog instead of copy-pasting everything word for word and saying you found it yourself. (Yes ik most of these scans are everywhere but copy pasting word for word and whatnot instead of just linking is weird). Thanks
What rule does this break?
It was said that it is not allowed to copy other people's things once and post them by a staff member, but you can check around.
is that really necessary
Nah man it's not that deep, it's nothing personal lol
I see, fine then.
holy shit that's more evidence than I thought there'd be and it comes from Daizenshuu and Chozenshuu which are pretty much the most reliable sources for Dragon Ball after the manga and anime (and maybe the El Manga Legendario). Why isnt infinite universes accepted again? from what I know there are no real contradictions to it found in the source material@Robo432343 Would have asked in private but uh, ur profile is limited so.... I'd appreciate if you credited me or just linked my blog instead of copy-pasting everything word for word and saying you found it yourself. (Yes ik most of these scans are everywhere but copy pasting word for word and whatnot instead of just linking is weird). Thanks
seriously? don't engage with people who say that, incredulity isnt a valid rebuttalHyperbole
🗣
Yes that and instead of mugen, hateshinai was used to describe infinite
I'm pretty sure mugen is used in many of those statements too though
Not even a month and here we are. Oh well.well
Dragon Ball Super: Grand Priest Conceptual Manipulation Removal
Hi, it's me. I felt I should make this at some point, as I'd developed some grievances with this ability toward the end of the thread that it was accepted in, but I didn't want to be the guy spontaneously bringing up problems in a concluded thread. So, here's my response thread on the Grand...vsbattles.com
Really, whenever we achieve something good, there is a downgrade, i don't even want to get involved in that.
not enough education I guess
What's so good about GP having concept manipulation, when the ability is not even that usefull.
Flowery language, poetry, hyperbole, and logic that is similar to saying the numbers between 0 and 1 is finite.
Everything for them is hyperbole and poetry, that's strange.Flowery language, poetry, hyperbole, and logic that is similar to saying the numbers between 0 and 1 is finite.
But yeah this is a statement made in the Daizenshuu and Chozenshuu a bunch of times. Mugen and Hateshinai are both used. People don’t realize how much evidence there is for until they see it for themselves.
dude....even the numbers between 0 and 0.1 are uncountably infinite.
yeah thats just stupid. Someone needs to do a proper thread sooner with all the information and multiple verifications from many different on- and offsite translators
But yeah this is a statement made in the Daizenshuu and Chozenshuu a bunch of times. Mugen and Hateshinai are both used. People don’t realize how much evidence there is for until they see it for themselves.
We have the translation of @Executor_N0 which is very accurate, talking about infinite things makes me a little excited, there will definitely be something in Daima about this.
I’m quite aware. Imo the statements of the Universe apply to the part of the Universe that’s stated to be illuminated by light and not the darkness where the unknown exists. Even if there is an actual edge infinity has an edge and center in mathematics. 0 < 0.5 < 1. This is an example of an uncountable infinite having an edge. Ngl idk why we argue things that aren’t true in mathematics.
about this, this isnt necessarily true. This banks on the assumption that there is an "equal" number of infinite terms between 0 and 0.5 and 0.5 and 1, that is the only way for this infinity to have a "center" but this assumption cant actually be proven. regardless, these arguments dont matter. its stated to be infinite many, many times
Not being Dragon Ball, i believe.Well whats needed for cm then when name dropping the word concept is not enough?
I have the same opinionTbh I believe if the evidence is 100% no ifs, any other interpretation of it. Then I think it could be added. Just it need a concrete, irrefutable, no toher interpretation of the feat type of evidence. You really cannot out mental gymnastics against something like that.
Which is impossible for a verse that doesn't involve itself with powerscaling too much, Especially the canon.
