Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,854
- 8,711
um, goku and vegeta never fought broly on ice. only after the lava erupted did broly even transform.it was all the same
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
um, goku and vegeta never fought broly on ice. only after the lava erupted did broly even transform.it was all the same
Dude, stop talking shit! When I quote you on something you show up, okay with you?um, goku and vegeta never fought broly on ice. only after the lava erupted did broly even transform.
Maybe try to be respectful?Let's use your mother as a basis, if your mother destroys the universe is necessarily to have quote to affect universe?
Most? I have little patience to put up with this guy's hater against any DB upTalvez tentar ser respeitoso?
I'm not talking shit. I'm refuting your claims. Get the stick out of your ass.Dude, stop talking shit! When I quote you on something you show up, okay with you?
it sure is, for all things you say something without logic, being that I was literally denying the novel being canonical, but no, I have to put up with a negotiator because yesEu não estou falando merda. Estou refutando suas alegações. Tire o pau do seu rabo.
Toriyama and Kusakabe listed as the novel's authors/creators. It states that Toriyama is responsible for the original story, script, and character design, while Kusakabe is responsible for the novel's own adaptation.
Literally named after Akira toriyama in the novel, not considering it for the manga or movie is totally negotiable
There is no contradiction about the novel not being valid for the manga or movie, in the manga there is no Brolly arc and what we literally have to take is what was shown as canonical, and it was also shown events from the movie in the manga and it was all the same
It's easier for you to say that the Knights of the Zodiac EP G is not canon, than to say that the movie/novel is not valid for the manga.
The novel does nothing but elaborate the story, better explaining certain aspects and showing certain scenes from a different angle.
Well here's something else important
well, adm, for now nothing that refutes the novel, everything happened according to the movie and even mentioned that Brolly is above Bills, it's up to you to accept such a book to level up the mangaWell, I suppose that seems fairly reliable, although it is possible that the book's author changed Toriyama's original story outline a bit.
OkAlém disso, todos precisam tentar ser calculistas e educados uns com os outros aqui. Esta deve ser uma comunidade agradável e amigável.
ThanksOkay, then I also do not mind.
According to Herms, this dimension does not exist within the reality of universe 7, it is beyond universe 7, so it has its own space-time.
The above-mentioned battleground that could only be made with CG will be a highlight of the movie (they say). It's a type of place that doesn’t exist in reality, like an alternate dimension, and they created it with the software Unity.
Where he quotes scan:
Source:
Dragon Ball official website mentioned of the superdimensional dimension
I guess it's fine. Don't know much about the manga though.So do we have sufficient staff agreements to apply this revision?
What did LordGriffin1000 and Elizhaa think?
man you are just the bestOK. Obrigado pelas respostas. O que foi aceito aqui provavelmente pode ser aplicado então.
could you add to the manga profile?Should these translations be accurate, I have no issues including them in the profiles.
1. We don't know the size of that dimensionBuuhan (we're talking toei) was going to destroy the universe by destroying the dimensional boundaries in the macrocosm, essentially collapsing everything upon itself. The power in the fight here crumbled the dimension in its entirety past its boundary. The feats aren't similar.
Vai chain reaction by destroying a part of the boundaryWell toei Buuhan feat is confirmed to be universal in guidebooks and it’s done through sheer power, it’s just that it is a massive outlier for him so It is not included.
1. What evidence supports the thinking that this dimension they were moved to in the vastness of the main universe is anything less than universal in size?1. We don't know the size of that dimension
2. The fact they couldn't destroy their universe like they did the other dimension means their power isn't low 2c
The op drop scans with no translations. I didn't see anything saying they destroyed a dimension. Nor anything relating to its size.1. What evidence supports the thinking that this dimension they were moved to in the vastness of the main universe is anything less than universal in size?
2. This doesn't make any sense. Does the fact that Goku and Beerus didn't actually destroy Universe 7 not make them universal?
So according to you when the size of a dimension is unknown the common assumption is to say that it is universal in size? By the way, according to OP, the dimension is beyond the limits of the universe1. What evidence supports the thinking that this dimension they were moved to in the vastness of the main universe is anything less than universal in size?
1. This is begging the question. The burden is on you to prove that the dimension isn't universal if not higher.The op drop scans with no translations. I didn't see anything saying they destroyed a dimension. Nor anything relating to its size.
1.What supports the idea that this dimension is universal?
2. Goku beerus is different theirs a statement they would have over time plus they were holding back. Theirs no such statement for broly and Gogeta. But like I said if they can shatter a dimension which you think universal. Why can't they destroy their own universe? Especially since they fought longer and used more power In their universe.
The only confined and confirmed dimension with a size is the ROSAT, which was created to be the size it is. I'm assuming an extra-dimensional plane at least mirrors the standard plane unless proven otherwise. The universes all have bubble boundaries. The space containing the universes was not stated to have a boundary but is obviously far greater than universal. The null realm was stated to be infinite. It's a reasonable low assumption within the context of the show's cosmology. Like I said earlier, OP's translations stated they were affecting reality which is a stronger term than space or time.So according to you when the size of a dimension is unknown the common assumption is to say that it is universal in size? By the way, according to OP, the dimension is beyond the limits of the universe