- 7,554
- 7,741
To clarify, we are discussing the Toei continuity?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball: Finite Universe
- Thread starter Nostredam
- Start date
- Status
- 5,345
- 6,089
Dragon ball in general.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,388
- 3,880
Namek is located in another sector, which would make the distance between earth and namek infinite
- 5,345
- 6,089
Not really. A sector in totality might be considered infinite but it doesn't mean the distance between everything has to be infinite. Plus isn't it just in another galaxy?
- 957
- 1,300
They're heading off to boundless galaxies (like heading off to sea) to travel through them, not actually go to every single one, I think the analogy works fine. And the Black Star DBs are stated to be dispersed across the entire universe and all 4 quadrants which sounds like it would qualify for travelling infinite galaxies.
- 7,554
- 7,741
To my knowledge, Infinite Space was only applied to the Toei Continuity.
- 5,345
- 6,089
We composite toei cosmology to super due to branching timelines.
- 6,431
- 2,440
Wouldn’t that be infinite speed for their spaceship tho? Forgive me, it’s been a while since I’ve seen gt
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,243
- 4,066
Wait really?
- 7,554
- 7,741
Can you link me a profile that was affected from that composite thread?
- 5,345
- 6,089
Yes.
- 7,554
- 7,741
IIRC, 2-C Macrocosm was something agreed on prior to the composite thread.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,388
- 3,880
Namek is outside King Kai's juristriction, so it'd be in another sector, and since sectors are infinite, Bulma and co are gonna have to travel through that infinity to get to another sector
- 957
- 1,300
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure most infinite speed feats are on hold to be evaluated still or already considered outliers.
- 5,345
- 6,089
- 13,235
- 21,057
I don't like that I'm becoming known for Dragon Ball with the shitshow the threads tend to become...
Anyways I'm entirely neutral for now.
- 10,371
- 11,927
Letting you all know, I unfortunately will be out for the rest of the night. Avoid derailing and clogging the thread with circular discussions. You don't need to convince each other side, just present your arguments and let staff evaluate.
i will urge staff to actually read the entire OP and its proposals, as well as those that disagree.
Have a nice one, everyone. Stay civil.
i will urge staff to actually read the entire OP and its proposals, as well as those that disagree.
Have a nice one, everyone. Stay civil.
- 12,191
- 6,132
Well, we have this translation here that is very accurate about things related to the infinite Universe, this translation fits perfectly with @Zamasu_Chan and I wanted it to be checked beforehand by @Executor_N0
Translation credits: @Alonik
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,825
- 8,659
I agree, and I will be actively participating in the conversation.
(I will not be.)
(I will not be.)
- 1,649
- 1,137
Yet he has said multiple times that the things he has stated is just his opinion and what he himself personally thinks, and that one should ask Toei and the "original author side" himself first?
Yeah no, he ain't reliable bro, no way
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #63
The two scans on that blog were already contested in post #1.
- 3,493
- 5,191
A sector was never accepted as infinite sectors are just cardinal directions the universe in its totality is infinite though
I’ll read through this crt later but if the arguments are translation related we’ll need Executor’s input though he already translated all relevant scans
- 31,404
- 27,706
The OP makes sense to me. I'm in favor of it for now, but will see what responses are made.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,388
- 3,880
I mean, they're all still infinite, but i guess this makes sense
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #67
I didn't get it. People are saying that the sectors of the universe are not infinite, but the universe itself is; then why in Toei Broly's profile it is said this?
If that doesn't fulfil the justification of High 3-A, it shouldn't even be in the profile. Anyway, an infinite universe being divided in finite sectors is pretty much blatantly wrong also.
If that doesn't fulfil the justification of High 3-A, it shouldn't even be in the profile. Anyway, an infinite universe being divided in finite sectors is pretty much blatantly wrong also.
Eden_Warlock99
She/Her- 10,388
- 3,880
I think it's treated as a R.O.N.
- 13,235
- 21,057
Infinity / 4 = Infinity, that's why
Along with Paragus stating he'd destroy the universe.
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 9,825
- 8,659
Like Lephyr suggested, the opposing side should likely gather up counterarguments into a single post, instead of drip-feeding the discussion with Koyama tweets and spaceship-related conjecture.
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #71
That's not what I'm exactly referring to. All the 4 sectors of the universe share the same three-dimensional space and thus shouldn't have a division between them, as they would be the same thing (infinity).
That's the second justification on his profile about his tiering. I marked underline in bold the first one, which shouldn't be there.
Anyway, quoting myself:
- 15,452
- 15,869
I will be oberserving for a while before I give my thoughts, but I agree that the opposition should make one big post with the counterarguments.
- 3,493
- 5,191
Broly would eventually destroy the Universe
yeah no infinity/4 justification is a no he gets it from eventually destroying the universe
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #74
Read my message again.
- 3,493
- 5,191
Because we mention that Broly was Ravaging the south quadrant but if you look at the end it’s stated he’d eventually destroy the universe after he was done with the south quadrant
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #76
Yes, but him destroying the South Quadrant should not be used as a justification for High 3-A, especially considering that one of the scans is Koyama (an unreliable source) saying the universe has countless galaxies, which would lead readers to interpreted it as if you guys argue that is enough proof of High 3-A (which is not).
- 12,191
- 6,132
Never used the South quadrant to upgrade him to High 3-A, my god the destruction of the southern galaxy was just to upgrade him to 3-B with countless quotes of him destroying Galaxies in the plural by author and directors, even artwork showing So, he only got High 3-A because he's mentioned several quotes within the movie mentioning that he could destroy the universe and there's even mention about destroying multiple sectors of galaxies during the movie. They were supposed to get that thing out of there before they upgraded Broly to High 3-A.
- 12,173
- 4,381
whatever do you mean?
- 158
- 196
- Thread starter
- #79
I agree with you.
- 12,173
- 4,381
speaking serious now, could you add tags to the thread? that would help people to find this, at least, i think that mods can do this, if not, then please just ignore this comment as i go back to watch this unfold
- Status
Similar threads
