- 7,486
- 7,677
To clarify, we are discussing the Toei continuity?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dragon ball in general.To clarify, we are discussing the Toei continuity?
Namek is located in another sector, which would make the distance between earth and namek infiniteBut even if the universe was infinite doesn't mean they have to travel an infinite distance to get to another planet.
Not really. A sector in totality might be considered infinite but it doesn't mean the distance between everything has to be infinite. Plus isn't it just in another galaxy?Namek is located in another sector, which would make the distance between earth and namek infinite
They're heading off to boundless galaxies (like heading off to sea) to travel through them, not actually go to every single one, I think the analogy works fine. And the Black Star DBs are stated to be dispersed across the entire universe and all 4 quadrants which sounds like it would qualify for travelling infinite galaxies.I’m not so sure, if you said for instance you were heading to/for 3 places, then you prob traveled to each and every one. If you were heading to/for infinite galaxies, wouldn’t the same apply?
To my knowledge, Infinite Space was only applied to the Toei Continuity.Dragon ball in general.
We composite toei cosmology to super due to branching timelines.To my knowledge, Infinite Space was only applied to the Toei Continuity.
They're heading off to boundless galaxies (like heading off to sea) to travel through them, not actually go to every single one, I think the analogy works fine. And the Black Star DBs are stated to be dispersed across the entire universe and all 4 quadrants which sounds like it would qualify for travelling infinite galaxies.
Wait really?We composite toei cosmology to super due to branching timelines.
Can you link me a profile that was affected from that composite thread?We composite toei cosmology to super due to branching timelines.
Yes.Wait really?
Namek is outside King Kai's juristriction, so it'd be in another sector, and since sectors are infinite, Bulma and co are gonna have to travel through that infinity to get to another sectorNot really. A sector in totality might be considered infinite but it doesn't mean the distance between everything has to be infinite. Plus isn't it just in another galaxy?
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure most infinite speed feats are on hold to be evaluated still or already considered outliers.Wouldn’t that be infinite speed for their spaceship tho? Forgive me, it’s been a while since I’ve seen gt
When this thread gets finished I pretend to make a CRT explaining why 2-C Macrocosm is also wrong. Until they, people need to stay on topic here and analyze the arguments presented in post #1.
I don't like that I'm becoming known for Dragon Ball with the shitshow the threads tend to become...I will also tag @Theglassman12 @DemonGodMitchAubin and @CloverDragon03 as they have contributed immensely to DB threads in the past.
Well then. We doing this earlier than expected.
Last thread for reference.
Relevant parties: @Executor_N0 @LordGriffin1000 @Firestorm808 @DarkDragonMedeus @LordTracer @Planck69 @Damage3245 @Deagonx
I will be heavily moderating this. At the minimal chance of derail, I will straight move this to a staff discussion.
Well, we have this translation here that is very accurate about things related to the infinite Universe, this translation fits perfectly with @Zamasu_Chan and I wanted it to be checked beforehand by @Executor_N0IIRC, 2-C Macrocosm was something agreed on prior to the composite thread.
Yet he has said multiple times that the things he has stated is just his opinion and what he himself personally thinks, and that one should ask Toei and the "original author side" himself first?Koyama is the canon director of DBZ, he only says this out of respect for the canon that is made by Akira toriyama, when it is used in Toei it is absolutely right and nothing wrong with that.
The two scans on that blog were already contested in post #1.
A sector was never accepted as infinite sectors are just cardinal directions the universe in its totality is infinite thoughNamek is outside King Kai's juristriction, so it'd be in another sector, and since sectors are infinite, Bulma and co are gonna have to travel through that infinity to get to another sector
Yes.How else do you think we have 2-C macrocosm
I mean, they're all still infinite, but i guess this makes senseA sector was never accepted as infinite sectors are just cardinal directions the universe in its totality is infinite though
High Universe level (Destroyed entire sectors of the Southern Galaxy/Southern Quadrant while being restrained, NSEW Galaxy terms refer to a section of the universe which contain countless galaxies, leaving only a few planets and stars. King Kai stated he posed an imminent threat to the Northern Galaxy, and Paragus stated Broly would eventually destroy the universe which is infinite if he lost control of him)
Infinity / 4 = Infinity, that's whyIf that doesn't fulfil the justification of High 3-A, it shouldn't even be in the profile. Anyway, an infinite universe being divided in finite sectors is pretty much blatantly wrong also.
Infinity / 4 = Infinity, that's why
Along with Paragus stating he'd destroy the universe.
When this thread gets finished I pretend to make a CRT explaining why 2-C Macrocosm is also wrong. Until then, people need to stay on topic here and analyze the arguments presented in post #1.
Broly would eventually destroy the UniverseI didn't get it. People are saying that the sectors of the universe are not infinite, but the universe itself is; then why in Toei Broly's profile it is said this?
If that doesn't fulfil the justification of High 3-A, it shouldn't even be in the profile. Anyway, an infinite universe being divided in finite sectors is pretty much blatantly wrong also.
yeah no infinity/4 justification is a no he gets it from eventually destroying the universeInfinity / 4 = Infinity, that's why
Along with Paragus stating he'd destroy the universe.Honestly Toei Cell has a similar statement, where's his rating?
Read my message again.Broly would eventually destroy the Universe
Read my message again.
Because we mention that Broly was Ravaging the south quadrant but if you look at the end it’s stated he’d eventually destroy the universe after he was done with the south quadrantI didn't get it. People are saying that the sectors of the universe are not infinite, but the universe itself is; then why in Toei Broly's profile it is said this?
If that doesn't fulfil the justification of High 3-A, it shouldn't even be in the profile. Anyway, an infinite universe being divided in finite sectors is pretty much blatantly wrong also.
Yes, but him destroying the South Quadrant should not be used as a justification for High 3-A, especially considering that one of the scans is Koyama (an unreliable source) saying the universe has countless galaxies, which would lead readers to interpreted it as if you guys argue that is enough proof of High 3-A (which is not).Because we mention that Broly was Ravaging the south quadrant but if you look at the end it’s stated he’d eventually destroy the universe after he was done with the south quadrant
Never used the South quadrant to upgrade him to High 3-A, my god the destruction of the southern galaxy was just to upgrade him to 3-B with countless quotes of him destroying Galaxies in the plural by author and directors, even artwork showing So, he only got High 3-A because he's mentioned several quotes within the movie mentioning that he could destroy the universe and there's even mention about destroying multiple sectors of galaxies during the movie. They were supposed to get that thing out of there before they upgraded Broly to High 3-A.Yes, but him destroying the South Quadrant should not be used as a justification for High 3-A, especially considering that one of the scans is Koyama (an unreliable source) saying the universe has countless galaxies, which would lead readers to interpreted it as if you guys argue that is enough proof of High 3-A (which is not).
whatever do you mean?Center in the context could just refer to the original origin point of the universe.
I agree with you.Never used the South quadrant to upgrade him to High 3-A, my god the destruction of the southern galaxy was just to upgrade him to 3-B with countless quotes of him destroying Galaxies in the plural by author and directors, even artwork showing So, he only got High 3-A because he's mentioned several quotes within the movie mentioning that he could destroy the universe and there's even mention about destroying multiple sectors of galaxies during the movie. They were supposed to get that thing out of there before they upgraded Broly to High 3-A.
Well then. We doing this earlier than expected.
Last thread for reference.
Relevant parties: @Executor_N0 @LordGriffin1000 @Firestorm808 @DarkDragonMedeus @LordTracer @Planck69 @Damage3245 @Deagonx
I will be heavily moderating this. At the minimal chance of derail, I will straight move this to a staff discussion.