TyranoDoom30
He/Him- 2,335
- 1,023
Agreed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fixedthere's an error here Kaioken X10 Goku on namek should be small star level at 25 quettatons not dwarf star level
but it just takes a minor edit. The version he's proposing is blatantly wrong. we can't keep doing 5 different CRTs for the same topic over and over. Lets debate this here and nowFixed
Might be better to just let this one be evaluated and introduce mine at a later date
But do we use BP in this way?
Like, I have 200 BP and then 400, that would be 2x.
But I thought BP was inconsistent and non-linear enough to consider that doubling your BP would equally double your strength.
EDIT:
The OP itself shows that it doesn't make sense for the BP to increase correctly according to the multipliers because of Oozaru and other things.
So what stops Zarnon from becoming several times stronger but not having a numerical BP increase of several times as well? Considering the inconsistency.
But Kaioken is a CANONICAL multiplier which has a CANONICAL BP increase.For the love of pong about the BP numbers; they're not linear. A 1.2x gap in BP number has more often been not been a far bigger gap than 1.2x among many others. Not to mention some BP ratings come from sources less than reliable.
Actually Raditz’s power level is at 1200 as stated by NappaRaditz has a slightly higher power level of 1,500 and can tank an unexpected head-but from this Gohan. Piccolo kills both Raditz and Goku with his Special Beam Cannon - 66.4674952002 Zettatons (Planet level)
The OP's scaling is what's mostly being discussed, better to leave it at thatbut it just takes a minor edit. The version he's proposing is blatantly wrong. we can't keep doing 5 different CRTs for the same topic over and over. Lets debate this here and now
I believe it was modified to 1500 in a databook which makes sense as he managed to take a headbutt from a 1300+ Gohan and get back upActually Raditz’s power level is at 1200 as stated by Nappa
Mistranslation and Akira himself corrected it.Actually Raditz’s power level is at 1200 as stated by Nappa
The manga should take precedence over the data books which say that he’s 1200, and if Raditz was 1500, how come he was so worried about a 1330 Makankosappo?I believe it was modified to 1500 in a databook which makes sense as he managed to take a headbutt from a 1300+ Gohan and get back up
Mistranslation and Akira himself corrected it.
Raditz ran away from a 924 PL Kamehameha, I think he's just scared of anything even approaching his level of powerThe manga should take precedence over the data books which say that he’s 1200, and if Raditz was 1500, how come he was so worried about a 1400 Makankosappo?
Characters like him are heavily reliant on winning stat wiseRaditz ran away from a 924 PL Kamehameha, I think he's just scared of anything even approaching his level of power
Let's not forget that Raditz shares the same weakness of relying too much on scouters as practically every Frieza Force member. I think only Vegeta and Ginyu got over that particular weakness. Nappa kinda had to be informed by Vegeta about that part.Raditz ran away from a 924 PL Kamehameha, I think he's just scared of anything even approaching his level of power
Could I see?weekly shonen jump have his BP at 1,500
Depends on the context. Plenty of people give Daizenshuu equal precedence to the manga from what I've witnessed over the years.Could I see?
And shouldn’t the manga take precedent over secondary sources?
But less than a year later it turns out to be a 2X multiplierI'll chime in on this. I do think that the downgrade is a good idea, and part of the reason why is because back then, the Kaio-ken wasn't considered a direct statistics multiplier back when Z was made, which is a stark contrast to Dragon Ball Super where Kaio-ken is a direct power multiplier. Heck, I'd argue that back then, Kaio-ken wasn't a 2x multiplier by default since Goku had to yell out "Kaio-ken x2!" and there is no telling what the multiplier originally was.
Wait what?But less than a year later it turns out to be a 2X multiplier
Kanzenshuu 215: The Saibaiman can barely move as Tenshinhan walks back over to the others, and Nappa says that the Saibaimen have battle powers of 1,200.
Vegeta also said “Over 8000” and that doesn’t mean Goku is 9000Tbf he says it is "over" 1.200
In addition to you saying Kaioken and not to Zarbon or all of DB's general multipliers.But Kaioken is a CANONICAL multiplier which has a CANONICAL BP increase.
24000 from Kaioken X3 is 3/4ths of 32000 from Kaioken X4
That makes it IMPOSSIBLE for Zarbon, who has 23000 to 29000 BP between transformations, to be several times stronger. This implies 24000 to 32000 is also that much stronger, or even more. We'd have to change Goku's scaling.
What is your opinion on the substitution based on this calc for the avarege planet in DB thag is mentioned in the OP?It seems like the best solution is to cut all instances of scaling that depend on "If you multiply this characters power level then they'll be higher than this other character's power level so their base form can backscale from that." Unless there are direct statements of comparison involved.
everything between 8,000 and 32,000 is linearWhat happened to non-linear power levels?
My version did exactly that, only Kaioken and specific comparison statements backscaled to baseIt seems like the best solution is to cut all instances of scaling that depend on "If you multiply this characters power level then they'll be higher than this other character's power level so their base form can backscale from that." Unless there are direct statements of comparison involved.
They're still there as far as I can tell. In fact, as I said before, they're non-linear until Frieza's final form.What happened to non-linear power levels?
Kaioken was linear then as well tho, kaioken x2 Goku had a pl 180k,They're still there as far as I can tell. In fact, as I said before, they're non-linear until Frieza's final form.
Issue 1. Not "is", but "assumed".I'll summarize my disagreements here:
1.) as I said above the power levels from 8,000 to 32,000 are completely linear this means that power levels between them (such as 10,000 and 18,000) can safely be assumed to scale linearly as well
Issue 2. It really isn't NEEDED for anything, it ain't like they're desperate for fleshed out scaling and feats.I understand this thread aims to reduce downscaling as much as possible but lets not throw out the blatant statements and multipliers we have just because. Some downscaling is perfectly fine and needed IMO
come on now...are we really debating if the jump between 8,000 and 15,999 is only 1.000000000.......1X and suddenly as soon as it hits 16,000 the mutiplier goes to 2X?Issue 1. Not "is", but "assumed".
It is or the scaling is just gonna be wrong, we're given explicit multipliers and statements and they're already used. So the only reason they can't be used to backscale is if they're not accurate at all or they dont existIssue 2. It really isn't NEEDED for anything, it ain't like they're desperate for fleshed out scaling and feats.
yeah I don't see this supposed "point" that we've hit. DBZ is also extremely consistent with linear PLs and multipliers earlier in the arcs so I dont really care what other verses do. either you debunk the multipliers entirely or they're straight up wrong no other optionI mean fact of the matter is, it's just widely inconsistent, even if 90% of it might be legit, on paper, that doesn't always mean it checks out in practice. DBZ is EXCEPTIONALLY lucky to even be able to abuse multipliers to the extent it does, most verses can get away with like one multiplier, maybe two, and only if it's corroborated, and that's it, meanwhile DBZ's whole ass scaling is based on them, and even downscaling too, shit's bound to get contradictory at some point, and we've now hit that point. You've been given an inch and have taken a mile dog
Yes. DBZ has always been fucky, we've seen a 1.2 PL gap dust a mf before. And even a 2x gap is enough to negate any attack from a foe, it ain't as clear cut as you think.come on now...are we really debating if the jump between 8,000 and 31,999 is only 1.1X and suddenly as soon as it hits 32,000 the mutiplier goes to 3X?
Now prove they're accurate, corroborated by feats, and so on like any other verse. You realize it isn't one multiplier being used, it's a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, repeat like 8 more times.It is or the scaling is just gonna be wrong, we're given explicit multipliers and statements and they're already used. So the only reason they can't be used to backscale is if they're not accurate at all or they dont exist
You should care, given it's wiki standards in how we treat multipliers, you say it's extremely consistent? k, so surely you can point out the feats and statements that exist to support these extrapolated gaps and jumps and fractions yes? If you can't even do that, then unfortunately, what's consistent? Just because we're told a value, and then dude mogs weaker dude, doesn't mean the actual numerical values are 100% consistent, especially when you extrapolate the **** out of it. You aren't taking one or two multipliers, what's being done is taking a stack of them, and using it to scale, for the most part, disconnected groups.yeah I don't see this supposed "point" that we've hit. DBZ is also extremely consistent with linear PLs and multipliers earlier in the arcs so I dont really care what other verses do. either you debunk the multipliers entirely or they're straight up wrong no other option
Just trying to figure out somethingYes. DBZ has always been fucky, we've seen a 1.2 PL gap dust a mf before. And even a 2x gap is enough to negate any attack from a foe, it ain't as clear cut as you think.
Now prove they're accurate, corroborated by feats, and so on like any other verse. You realize it isn't one multiplier being used, it's a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, off a multiplier, repeat like 8 more times.
As it stands, it isn't accurate.
You should care, given it's wiki standards in how we treat multipliers, you say it's extremely consistent? k, so surely you can point out the feats and statements that exist to support these extrapolated gaps and jumps and fractions yes? If you can't even do that, then unfortunately, what's consistent? Just because we're told a value, and then dude mogs weaker dude, doesn't mean the actual numerical values are 100% consistent, especially when you extrapolate the **** out of it. You aren't taking one or two multipliers, what's being done is taking a stack of them, and using it to scale, for the most part, disconnected groups.
I mean, for non kaioken chains, linear backscaling without any direct proof is not very accurateCase by case, but it definitely gets worse the more multipliers and fractions you add to the chain, as the more you add, the bigger the room for error and more evidence you need for it to check out.
Apples and Oranges. It doesn't MATTER if Battle Power is inconsistent, we still abide by it and if someone's Battle Power is higher than someone else's, we still scale accordingly.In addition to you saying Kaioken and not to Zarbon or all of DB's general multipliers.
BP is extremely inconsistent and any increase in statistics will not always be linear.
As the OP gave the example of Ozaroo 10x, if he had to follow the BP correctly, Kid Goku with 100 or so BP would be close to or higher than raditz.
You just gave reason why we shouldn't, probably best to stop while you're ahead hereIt doesn't MATTER if Battle Power is inconsistent, we still abide by it
Kanzenshuu 215: The Saibaiman can barely move as Tenshinhan walks back over to the others, and Nappa says that the Saibaimen have battle powers of 1,200.