• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

"Do you wanna have a bad time?" - Sans Rebunks (SI, Resistances, KARMA)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't 2 staff disagreements mean that the thread is rejected thus should be closed?
It usually varies based on how much traffic, but 3 or more staff with voting rights vs no staff basically almost guarantees the former being the victor. If it's not a verse commonly invested among staff, sometimes 2 or bigger cases 1 is enough.
 
Agnaa disagrees with the thread and DarkDragon and Plank agree with him so it is: 0 staff that agree vs 3 staff that disagree.
Shion changed his profile picture and he might have quit for a bit.
Does that mean this CRT gets closed? Let's wait 1-2 days (or maybe even less, depending on what you think) and if nothing happens we should close this CRT.

Also, we should elaborate on that weakness thing here or make a new small CRT about it. The staff could give their input about it
 
Huh? Not really, it's just them becoming actually better, it's acknowledged many times in game. I feel like you are overusing with the whole "it's just meta" stuff.
I don't know what you mean.
Huh, no? It's just if you kill everyone but spare Vulkin, he will say you held back.
Nah, just don't kill all 40 monsters in Hotland/Core, basically just rush to Mettaton.
Yeah mb, rushed that post out since I had to go to work. Looking into it more, I saw the dialogue which came if you killed enough people in Hotlands/CORE but somehow skipped/spared/fled Mettaton NEO (requires cheating or glitches), and thought it was new, but it's just the "Neutral ending, killed all other main bosses" dialogue, which I failed to recognise.
Actually looking into this, an increase in LOVE does make Frisk more cruel.

LV1
tumblr_inline_o7acd3qN4t1tnlh39_500.png

LV2 to 4
tumblr_inline_o7ace3n8z31tnlh39_500.png

LV5 to 7
tumblr_inline_o7acejQC1z1tnlh39_500.png

LV8 and higher
tumblr_inline_o7acesrLxp1tnlh39_500.png


Of course, Frisk's mentality in the Genocide route is still more important, but it's still something to consider.
I'm not super convinced by this. The more general but weak argument is that this still just shows correlation, not causation, but I do know that Sans' judgement speech presents a more causative framework (but even that seems a bit more limited to the ease of killing, rather than of being forced to kill). More specifically and imo more convincing, Frisk acts a lot more empathetic/willing to play along in high-EXP neutral routes than they do in Snowdin on Genocide with minimal EXP (LV 5).

That plus the callousness Frisk presents (i.e. describing Monster Kid as "in the way"), while still being able to abandon Genocide and go back to being relatively normal, makes me really think all this stuff is reflective of the actions which would be expected given the amount of killing Frisk has done, rather than representing some mindhax that forces them to do bad things.
You are making assumptions now ey? What he said WAS pretty vague, he also literally just learned that LOVE and EXP makes Frisk more violent. Though doesn't matter I dont want to take your nagging
"This argument is as wack as it was last time [when I disagreed]", "We shouldn't give SI to every monster for this sort of reasoning", I do think it was pretty clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top