- 14,147
- 7,405
It would be really goodHopefully they do a remake of DMC 1-3 with current graphics
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be really goodHopefully they do a remake of DMC 1-3 with current graphics
As an independent game it was okay. As a DMC game, it was sewage. Utterly disrespectful to the original and its audience, basically directly telling the people who liked the original to go bleep themselves in the game itself, complete with Not Dante glaring at the screen while insulting the audience. All while directly profiting off the original's name.DMC Devil May Cray it is very good, only old fans didn't take it well, but the game is impeccable.
DMC2 was a game that introduced some good new things, but its mechanics, particularly its lock-on mechanics, combined with the changes to Dante's personality, severely dragged it down. Ironically Lucia was more interesting than he was in the game, having a genuine character arc involving self-acceptance, family and overcoming the circumstances of one's birth. That's why people requested her reappearance in DMC5, which very much surprised the developers, and I think is why they brought her back and ship-teased her in the Before the Nightmare novel.The only game i didn't like playing, was 2 the worst game i played in my entire life
We have to admit that Dante from DMC Devil May Cray is very cool making fun of the original Dante, the story is very good, the gameplay even better, it was a Reboot to do everything right, but then original fans came with blood in their eyes and set fire to the game, everything was completely new and with a better explanation of the storyAs an independent game it was okay. As a DMC game, it was sewage. Utterly disrespectful to the original and its audience, basically directly telling the people who liked the original to go bleep themselves in the game itself, complete with Not Dante glaring at the screen while insulting the audience. All while directly profiting off the original's name.
Dante's personality in DMC 2 is not very well seen in him, he was never so serious, the game had horrible mechanics, which got to the point of nausea when you encountered the enemies, literally the game was a bad adaptation, it seems that the whole plot was designed in a hurry, the difficulty of the game was horrible, i put it on hard and it was extremely easy, bosses without essence, i don't think Lucia's story was well appreciated, it even seems that the directors wanted to remove Dante as the protagonist as they did in DMC4, but at least they did a little with Lucia.DMC2 was a game that introduced some good new things, but its mechanics, particularly its lock-on mechanics, combined with the changes to Dante's personality, severely dragged it down. Ironically Lucia was more interesting than he was in the game, having a genuine character arc involving self-acceptance, family and overcoming the circumstances of one's birth. That's why people requested her reappearance in DMC5, which very much surprised the developers, and I think is why they brought her back and ship-teased her in the Before the Nightmare novel.
It wasn't making fun, it was a mean-spirited middle finger to the audience. Not the best way to win them over. Imagine if Kevin Smith was contracted to remake the LOTR trilogy, and then restated his previous opinions about how it should have gone and his opinion of the audience. I literally shouldn't say what he said about it here, but ironically it would still be better than this, because at least Smith wasn't delivering it with spite, just condescension. The key is that the behaviour of the reboot devs was blatantly intended not in good fun, but as an expression of spite.We have to admit that Dante from DMC Devil May Cray is very cool making fun of the original Dante
If you like rip-offs of the Matrix with a drunk slob instead of Keanu. Even the final boss was ripped off from the original plan for Agent Smith to literally merge with the city which was scrapped due to budget concerns.the story is very good
Gameplay was okay.the gameplay even better
... Not so much. Telling your audience that they're trash and being intentionally spiteful towards them isn't doing things right.it was a Reboot to do everything right
Funny how burning down peoples' series, insulting them for not liking what you've done and even working those insults into your product in an intentionally spiteful way alienates your audience. So many people working in entertainment media don't seem to get that.but then original fans came with blood in their eyes and set fire to the game
Not better so much. Acceptable as a self-contained non-DMC story. Hence, would have been okay as a different and independent title. Still not a DMC game. If someone remakes Dragon Ball with Goku as a robot made in a lab by Doctor Gohan, and Bulma as an old homeless woman who took him in and raised him while Roshi is now leading a resistance against the rich human Frieza and the other robot Majin Buu's united world empire of Earth, it could be an okay story, but it isn't Dragon Ball. If that story also repeatedly mocks the real Dragon Ball and its audience in a way that is clearly spiteful rather than just in good fun, it's going to get a bad reaction.everything was completely new and with a better explanation of the story
Lucia has a lot of unrealized potential as a character. Especially with her relationship with Matier, which needs more exploring.Dante's personality in DMC 2 is not very well seen in him, he was never so serious, the game had horrible mechanics, which got to the point of nausea when you encountered the enemies, literally the game was a bad adaptation, it seems that the whole plot was designed in a hurry, the difficulty of the game was horrible, i put it on hard and it was extremely easy, bosses without essence, i don't think Lucia's story was well appreciated,
I think that was the start of the push to remove him, but I also don't think it was the serious attempt that the later ones were.it even seems that the directors wanted to remove Dante as the protagonist as they did in DMC4, but at least they did a little with Lucia.
Appearances by Beryl and Enzo on-screen might be nice.Although, they fixed every mistake in DMC 2 in 3 and did an excellent job, so much so that it is the most loved to this day, i believe DMC 2 could be better, but it really wasn't like DMC 1 where every villain and game mechanic was excellent, Even the enemies during the game weren't boring like in DMC 2, maybe someday they'll remake 2, it's what needs it most, apart from all those boring parts, and improve the story further and add things from the novel.
Bruh. That was literally the worst stunt they could have pulled out, mocking the fans you are supposed to be trying to appeal to is stupid and one of the many reasons why it failed miserably.We have to admit that Dante from DMC Devil May Cray is very cool making fun of the original Dante, the story is very good, the gameplay even better, it was a Reboot to do everything right, but then original fans came with blood in their eyes and set fire to the game, everything was completely new and with a better explanation of the story
Dragon's Dogma fans: first time?Why is Itsuno like this...?
Wouldn't it be the other way around tho, chronologically speaking?Dragon's Dogma fans: first time?
True but DMC 5 was and still is an excellent sequel to DMC 4 that was worth waiting for meanwhile DD2 is a very flawed yet fun sequel to DD that wasn't worth waiting for.Wouldn't it be the other way around tho, chronologically speaking?
I was actually talking about comparing DMC Reboot to DMC4, which was a kick in the balls to the OG fans of the series. But you are correct about DMC5 and Dragons Dogma 2.True but DMC 5 was and still is an excellent sequel to DMC 4 that was worth waiting for meanwhile DD2 is a very flawed yet fun sequel to DD that wasn't worth waiting for.
I mean the reboot being permanently abbreviated as DmC says it all tbh. A game with good gameplay but it really should've been it's own thing and not a reboot to a beloved Capcom franchise (at a time where the future of iconic and cult classic IPs was up in the air).I was actually talking about comparing DMC Reboot to DMC4, which was a kick in the balls to the OG fans of the series. But you are correct about DMC5 and Dragons Dogma 2.
I still enjoyed my run of DD2, flaws and all. Although, I have a feeling they've cut content out to release later though, not new for Capcom starting from what I remember with SF vs Tekken characters. I reckon they did similar with DMC 5, not having bloody palace on release.True but DMC 5 was and still is an excellent sequel to DMC 4 that was worth waiting for meanwhile DD2 is a very flawed yet fun sequel to DD that wasn't worth waiting for.
Though in typical Capcom fashion I expect paid DLC and/or a definitive version for DD2 (similar to the definitive edition of DMC 5) but it's pretty jarring seeing DD Dark Arisen cost a fraction of the price of DD2 yet still has significantly more content which is ironic considering roughly half of the intended content of DD was cut due to budget constraints and now that Itsuno (presumably) received the time and money to fully realize his intended vision for the DD franchise that he couldn't do with the first game and you'll think the sequel would at least have comparable content to a 10+ yrs old game with it's DLC (nearly half the intended content cut ofc) yet the sequel doesn't even have simple stuff anymore like "hardmode" and for every QoL improvement/addition (a significantly more detailed creator, spells take less time to cast plus are more accurate, new vocations, etc) another feature is completely messed up compared to the first game (mircotransactions for in-game items, there are less spells to choose from plus are less diverse, vocations getting removed, etc).
Add in the fact while DMC 5 (base) received almost universally positive feedback and is generally seen as an amazing game, DD2 (base) is receiving heavily mixed feedback and is generally seen as a good game with big flaws which considering these are games some peeps have waited over a decade for is pretty much like night and day.
Indeed, why is Itsuno like this? But considering Capcom's history (E.g Asura's Wrath having it's true ending being locked behind a paywall) and the increase MTXs and monetization in Capcom games they might've been some corporate meddling too, tho that's doesn't excuse Itsuno from insulting parts of the DMC fandom.
In addition to Trish being in the Hunter's section, her avatar frame has popped up, making it very likely she's the next Hunter given NebulaJoy's past in releasing characters like this.
They literally have a meme there as a pfp lmao"Light in the Dark"
They really aware of that meme lol
Capcom has been aware of many jokes or the like, such as Chun Li being thicc, Akuma casually messatsu child and that you cant fix AKI"Light in the Dark"
They really aware of that meme lol
Also Deviljho being a pickle...Capcom has been aware of many jokes or the like, such as Chun Li being thicc, Akuma casually messatsu child and that you cant fix AKI
Trish was released with today's PoC update, she's electric type, plays a lot like her DMC 4SE counterpart. Story seems to be a departure from the demon artefacts like Nero's story.
Nero doesn't have a story mode tho
This wouldn't qualify. A space containing a Low 2-C structure and is infinite in size could just be Low 2-C itself (say the Low 2-C structure it contains is finite in size, for instance)Is that thing about DW containing the human world and being infinite before it still valid?
I've seen some verses get 2-A because a space contains a Low 2-C structure and is infinite.
You could try the same.
DMC should easily get 2A with the discussion we had on the CRT and it will be applied soon.Is that thing about DW containing the human world and being infinite before it still valid?
I've seen some verses get 2-A because a space contains a Low 2-C structure and is infinite.
You could try the same.
To be clear, you would need a separate thread for that. You shouldn't be changing any profiles based on your most recent thread.DMC should easily get 2A with the discussion we had on the CRT and it will be applied soon.
I think it would be better to make that thread as a new thread with formatted justifications. Don't include anything about tier 1, because that just makes a huge mess.DMC should easily get 2A with the discussion we had on the CRT and it will be applied soon.
Start with 2-A, and if the thread brings about discussion of Low 1-C being more valid, then switch to that. Otherwise just start with 2-A then try Low 1-C later. Keep in mind that repeated attempts at the same upgrade will result in it being a banned thread.But that is wrong because the structure is supposed to be L1C instead knowing the standards.
I think it would be better to make that thread as a new thread with formatted justifications. Don't include anything about tier 1, because that just makes a huge mess.
Start with 2-A, and if the thread brings about discussion of Low 1-C being more valid, then switch to that. Otherwise just start with 2-A then try Low 1-C later. Keep in mind that repeated attempts at the same upgrade will result in it being a banned thread.
Best not to work alone either. Get input from other supporters.Since now i understood how the wiki evaluation system works and the tiering system in general, I'll bring more positive cases here with quotes from FAQ to support my claim.
As to what exactly i wanna prove there back then but can't due to my limitations in knowledge on that matter specifically.
It seems there is a case for the Demon World satisfying this requirement. It is repeatedly stated to be infinite in size, and it is referred to as infinite in relation to the human world which is a Low 2-C structure, a structure it also used to contain. I've noticed that the thing that trips up your cosmology upgrades is the issue of qualitative superiority, which is irrelevant to 2-A. The easier the upgrade is, the harder it is to block.Being infinite in size and containing a Low 2-C structure doesn't mean anything unless it's infinite in relation to the structure. Then, one could argue that such a structure would be 2-A, because then it could arguably hold an infinite number of such structures.
Best not to work alone either. Get input from other supporters.
Edit: I was just reading another revision thread and Clover said:
It seems there is a case for the Demon World satisfying this requirement. It is repeatedly stated to be infinite in size, and it is referred to as infinite in relation to the human world which is a Low 2-C structure, a structure it also used to contain. I've noticed that the thing that trips up your cosmology upgrades is the issue of qualitative superiority, which is irrelevant to 2-A. The easier the upgrade is, the harder it is to block.
You'd need a CRT for that. This makes it sound like you want someone to change the profiles to this right now.however I would still try to ask someone to apply it for now.
It is referred to as infinite darkness while the human world is referred to as a single ray of light. Likened to a finite ray of light in infinite darkness.That's the thing my friend, it isn't.
Its never compared to the L2C structure and was stated to be infinite as its own stuff... As a container.
Start with 2-A. Tier 1 is highly subjective. In fact, arguably anything above 2-C is subjective, with subjective standards.2A perhaps would be good but ultimately that ain't my goal at all however I would still try to ask someone to apply it for now.
I don't think SonicTL means applying changes without a CRT.You'd need a CRT for that. This makes it sound like you want someone to change the profiles to this right now.
You'd need a CRT for that. This makes it sound like you want someone to change the profiles to this right now.
Well, yes, but everything you proposed was wrong.However this could've been much better if we actually came to a conclusion in that previous CRT.
Well, yes, but everything you proposed was wrong.