- 825
- 109
Bill's durability should honestly be rated as 2-A if we're giving him it as a solid tiering. If not, then Low 2-C, possibly/likely 2-A.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry I can see where you got confused. I kudosed it because the over abundunce of Bill CRTs is funny.ShadowWarrior1999 said:You kudos'd the OP but fine I'll remove your name.MYHERO said:Shadow I never said I agreed with it.
stop right there criminal scumJooCipher said:i meanDziga said:I think we should re-debate the legitimacy of High 1-C Bill.
some brave warrior on the internet tried to bring back High 1-C Bill once...
do don't use link to watch out.Sir sun man said:stop right there criminal scumJooCipher said:i meanDziga said:I think we should re-debate the legitimacy of High 1-C Bill.
some brave warrior on the internet tried to bring back High 1-C Bill once...
They don't receive a rating because of the threat statement, only by actual feats. That's the entire point. What? Threatening an infinite multiverse does not require infinite x because again being a threat is not an ap feat. It could mean quite literally anything and occam's razor only gets you so far when there is a lack of context here.Kepekley23 said:The reply to me.
?ShadowWarrior1999 said:I think Data is spot on.
oh boyGenericstickman said:If we allow it for Bill then we should allow it for other characters, can't wait for 3-A Kirby (actually that won't be half bad) and Z Goku
No, because their case would be a False Analogy as their case are not the same.Genericstickman said:If we allow it for Bill then we should allow it for other characters, can't wait for 3-A Kirby (actually that won't be half bad) and Z Goku
I can count with my fingers the amount of non-staff users here whose opinion actually matters.Eficiente said:I believe this matter, clearly different from the original intention of the thread, must be brought into a Staff only discussion.
But Bill has hardly any feats to go off. When a character's power is so vague initself, than sometimes you have to rely on statements rather than actual showings.Paul Frank said:Not really elizhaa
Bill is getting a rating from a vague statement and no feats
According to kep that's how we do things thus any other character with a vague threat statement can get a tier from that
The statement is that Bill is a "threat" to the multiverse, which by itself isn't enough to warrant a tier.Elizhaa said:I do agree with Inverted Tempest's points. Another is that we also use Statements for rating. We have book verse, for example, where feats are statements and the multiverse statement is from the book. Currently, I see Ford Pines's statement about the multiverse being Option 2. Via Occam's razor, it required way more interpretations to say Bill is not 2-A than 2-A.
ShadowWarrior1999, Time Baby never fully made the distinction about universe or multiverse. It just was the general view.