- 22,441
- 48,337
HuzzahAnyways lets move on to something important.
Cole vs Alex is no BS just flatout happening next time.
Hurray
Time for another 3D Peak
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HuzzahAnyways lets move on to something important.
Cole vs Alex is no BS just flatout happening next time.
Hurray
First time?Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.
So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
If they give ColeAlex same passion as BillDiscord then we have modern kino.Huzzah
Time for another 3D Peak
Raise hands if you're an OG and have been waiting for this since Season 1.Anyways lets move on to something important.
Cole vs Alex is no BS just flatout happening next time.
Hurray
Truthfully, I didnt play Infamous in 2009 and even then it was never my big MU want, I expected them to do it eventually. They referenced it in 2018, surely it was given. Then eventually I realized it was a cuckadoodled ep. It then became one of my most wanteds, to not let a good MU to be cuckadoodled.Raise hands if you're an OG and have been waiting for this since Season 1.
I think it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.
So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
yeah, its all good if you disagree and is respectful, like genuinly people are crapping themselves because the mlp character didn't beat the illuminati ripoffI hope by toxic they dont mean people who disagree with verdicts and post reasonable debunks, rather the nutters who pretend to be researcher and lord knows if they send death threats as well.
Ofc, angry debunks prolly do count as toxic as well.
Idk chief folks still be disagreeing n shit reddit and else where don't agree to everything DB does I terms of outcomeFirst time?
For years anytime someone disagreed with a Deathbattle ruling they got dismissed and got called "toxic" or "salty". Doesn't matter how valid the counterarguments were.
Whole argument can be fraudulent but they can just call you a name and dismiss you.
Ahhh the Deathbattle community.
ThisI think it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.
Keep in mind, I think the post-analysis wasn't great but I wasn't gonna let it ruin the episode for me.
HelloRaise hands if you're an OG and have been waiting for this since Season 1.
yeah, mostly everyone on reddit disagrees with the episodeIdk chief folks still be disagreeing n shit reddit and else where don't agree to everything DB does I terms of outcome
Cole should have for the most part unlike the big 3 Alex doesn't have many strong win cons besides black light virusSo, do you guys think that they'll give the dub to Cole (rightfully), or will they have another ***** up with the research?
Bill's D stuff is kinda wank but it technically exists.So, do you guys think that they'll give the dub to Cole (rightfully), or will they have another ***** up with the research?
Bill does have some fine 5D stuff, g1^2 I think handled that section fine imoBill's D stuff is kinda wank but it technically exists.
Alex just does not have that, in fact its Cole being Moon level wank that exists. This should be more akin to GutsDimitri, as in casuals historically favored Alex to win.
in before goku having 4D a/pDimensional shit is always wack. How would Bill even be 11D or just 5D when 3D beings interact with him :VVV
Why should Death Battle choose an Inuyasha character over a JoJo character?muh Muzan vs Naraku
I hate death battle subreddit so much. They are so naive.Oh no, Bill & Discord have chaosed our reality too far!
Seventy96 is back!
That was DBX episode reference.You think Bendy vs Cuphead will happen since they were spotted in the background and the pentagram sigil hasn't been done yet?
Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.
So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
This matchup has higher chance of happening than Kars vs Meruem:
In conclusion: I believe Death Battle will choose Kars vs Muzan because it's way more profitable than Kars vs Meruem.
- Death Battle has already done Jonathan vs. Tanjiro, so they are familiar with pitting JoJo and Demon Slayer characters against each other.
- Jonathan vs. Tanjiro garnered over 800 thousand views in 24 hours, while Killua vs. Misaka received less than 500 thousand views in the same timeframe.
- Demon Slayer and Muzan's popularity is on the rise, while Hunter x Hunter and Meruem's popularity remains stagnant.
- The final season of Demon Slayer is near, so there will be more hype Muzan. Kars vs. Muzan is likely to be even more requested.
The only reason why Death Battle would theoretically choose Kars vs. Meruem is because it holds more legacy and/or they may prefer this matchup.
Why should Death Battle choose an Inuyasha character over a JoJo character?
As I said before, it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.This but Excalibur vs Raiden, more or less. It's disingenuity we're referring to.
Zero arguments.
Never gonna happen.Oh yeah Seventy, since you’re back I wanna ask, what’s your thoughts on Lucifer SMT vs Lucemon?
No I mean you like it as an MU? thoughts on the debate? stuff like that, I already know the likelihood of the MUNever gonna happen.