- 1,881
- 230
In a later time, I suppose its possible for me to have some spare time to list some justifications for some of these characters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would anybody be willing to help with this?Antvasima said:Hmm. The problem is that I am not sure when we previously rated them as, or what calculation that we based it on, so we might have to find and calculate new feats to scale from.
All right, things are moving. But I'm just waiting for Matthew to put his bases, for example those up and on the other thread.Antvasima said:It will likely take quite a while for them to reply. Things tend to go slowly around here, due to that most people are busy IRL.
Interesting, but he said that this is not official (https://twitter.com/JMDeMatteis/status/1044023793482715138), and that's just what he thinks. And in the comic, Sena calls universes of dimension.Matthew Schroeder said:https://twitter.com/JMDeMatteis/status/829710923191504897
he confirmed Sena was talking about infinite higher dimensions, lower and everything in between
I'll tell you what'--do as i ask of you...Be my guide as i explore this new universe-- And i'll consider leaving you in possession of all three legs. Excellent! now come, stargrave: a new dimension beckons... | ||
~ Sena The Wanderer |
Nah it's very obvious. I think this is the only time in years this happened.Antvasima said:Do we need to add some links to scans with evidence for the profiles, so our visitors do not end up doubtful and confused?
Oh, I agree.Reppuzan said:@Matt
It's still better to link it than not.
There it is, one universe can be larger than the other, but dimensionality is about axes, coordinates, that a space has. That's the basics of spatial geometry. Basically, it is to look for dimensionality only because it is written "dimension" even that means many things, and does not always refer to spatial geometry.Shivansh Garg said:@Alonik A few things. Higher Dimensional Universes are still called as 'Universes'
De Metties has a habit of leaving it to reader's interpretation
Well okay, I will not ignore it, I'll assume it is. But is not this inconsistent with what DC accepts at its dimensional level? DC accepts the Grant Morrison multiverse map as its true cosmology. https://www.dccomics.com/blog/2014/08/18/the-map-of-the-multiverse Morrison made it clear in an interview that the whole Multiverse is based on the M-Theory, which has only 11 Dimensions.Matthew Schroeder said:... But the writer confirmed it is spatial dimensions, what are we even debating at this point?
I used a lot of this M-Theory, brane multiverse stuff in Final Crisis. Doug Mahnke did a great 3-D drawing of an inter-brane corridor in the Superman Beyond segments ― and it ties in fine with how I see things operating on recursive, isomorphic scales, or dimensions. I'm ready to accept that our entire lives are playing out across a 2-D film as thin as soap bubble skin, since ― as above, so below ― we already have our own examples of such branes in the form of movie and TV screens, the pages of books and of comics. | ||
~ Grant Morriso |
I sent a confirmation about how it worked, and the other the characters saying it has 11 dimensions. Did you even read what's on the scan?Matthew Schroeder said:Nothing of your claims confirms only 11 dimensions. Just because it uses some elements of M-Theory doesn't mean it only has 11 dimensions.
Seriously, drop this. DC is not getting their dimensions downgraded.
This world we know, this universe, exists in one dimensions--One realm of time and space. There are others. Eleven in all. "Separated spartially, though not by your notice of distance. "imagine a loaf of bread-- A great whole--With each slice representing a different dimensions. "Everything the world at large can comprehend rests in one suce. My goal is to reach across to the other slices. To reachs the other dimensions. "And make the theorical tangible |