- 167,703
- 76,303
Okay. Thank you for helping out. I have opened the Superboy-Prime page for you to edit. Tell me here when you are done.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the word "stories" isn't being used in a metafictional way, they are just referring to the lives of people in the universe. The Chronicler literally documents the events of each multiverse and describes them as stories, but it's never presented in a metafictional way. The assumption is being made that it's metafictional because of a couple of instances of the word story.Then I have no idea why people are saying it isn't metafictional enough. Could anyone summarize their reasons for saying that?
He didn't write them, he documented them, that's a big difference.the Chronicler explicitly stated that the stories of the Multiverse was different from the rest of the Multiverses of the Omniverse, and that he wrote the destruction of previous stories in his book. How can he write lower dimensions in his book?
Nothing about it is metafictional, they are just destroying universesLet's say it is not a plot manipulation; what do you call it? You can't say it is not Plot manipulation, but not calling alternative.
And you also can't ignore the ability, that's literally one of his abilities (I think it is main as it is presented in comics)
Do we deal the feat as an Outlier or make him Unknown?Okay. Thank you for helping out. I have opened the Superboy-Prime page for you to edit. Tell me here when you are done.
You actually did not answer my question but alright.Nothing about it is metafictional, they are just destroying universes
EDIT: I see the matter has been resolved. Sorry for the superfluous post about it.
I think we should write a note for that feat then, so that others won't make CRTs trying to upgrade SBP with that feat.It seems better to remove it due to being an outlier.
Since TDK without Crisis Energy+Wally's energy= 1-A(scaling to Perpetua), and we know Wally<TDK, wouldn't TDK without Crisis Energy need to be 1-A as well? After all, any lower tier added twice wouldn't reach 1-A, like Low 1-A+Low 1-A=Low 1-A, not 1-A.
So the only way TDK(without CE)+Wally>1-A(Perpetua) can happen is if TDK himself was 1-A.
I definitely disagree with SPB getting to 1-A though. Even if this feat is 1-A for him, it would be an unimaginably big outlier.
That seems like a good idea, yes.I think we should write a note for that feat then, so that others won't make CRTs trying to upgrade SBP with that feat.
Also, what do you think about this? I finished editing TBWL, Perpetua, Manhattan, and The Hands btw, though TBWL will have to stay unlocked if this is fine:
I do not know. Sorry. I would appreciate input from knowledgeable members.Since TDK without Crisis Energy+Wally's energy= 1-A(scaling to Perpetua), and we know Wally<TDK, wouldn't TDK without Crisis Energy need to be 1-A as well? After all, any lower tier added twice wouldn't reach 1-A, like Low 1-A+Low 1-A=Low 1-A, not 1-A.
So the only way TDK(without CE)+Wally>1-A(Perpetua) can happen is if TDK himself was 1-A.
I definitely disagree with SPB getting to 1-A though. Even if this feat is 1-A for him, it would be an unimaginably big outlier.
Its noted a couple time in Secret Origins that Prime is different, we also have Batmanhattan say there was "more to you than I thought" upon being punched by SBP. There's also the fact that SBP in this story is just demonstrably superior to his other versions like punching Batmanhattan so hard he not only retconned the multiverse but retconned himself back into existence.Any other interpretation seems extremely suspicious.
Good pointI think that Prime was simply resurrected by the Hands after they restored the multiverse, but that this part of the story happened after Wonder Woman defeated The Darkest Knight, and that Prime defeating TDK seemed to be the kind of ridiculously extreme plot-induced stupidity that is typical for DC Comics and Marvel Comics. We cannot give out 1-A ratings left and right every time it happens. By that logic we would have to scale Thor to 1-A for harming the Chaos King and give Black Panther the same rating for defeating the Logos as well, for example.
Uh.. i wonder why isn't logos profile on the this wiki? Master order and lord chaos too.I think that Prime was simply resurrected by the Hands after they restored the multiverse, but that this part of the story happened after Wonder Woman defeated The Darkest Knight, and that Prime defeating TDK seemed to be the kind of ridiculously extreme plot-induced stupidity that is typical for DC Comics and Marvel Comics. We cannot give out 1-A ratings left and right every time it happens. By that logic we would have to scale Thor to 1-A for harming the Chaos King and give Black Panther the same rating for defeating the Logos as well, for example.
Well, he's going from 4-B to 2-C and from 2-A to Low 1-C as we consider things so he's already hopping up by infinities.Somehow going beyond infinite degrees of infinity times stronger without any explanation whatsoever seems like a pretty clear-cut outlier, yes. Any other interpretation seems extremely suspicious.
We already acknowledge that SBP during this event is stronger than his other versions. It would solely apply to this key.TDK seemed to be the kind of ridiculously extreme plot-induced stupidity
Sure I would agree that wouldn't work, but at the same time neither one of them are listed with a separate key explicitly scaling to a character that just got upgraded. Either we remove the key or we scale up prime. There's really no other option.By that logic we would have to scale Thor to 1-A for harming the Chaos King and give Black Panther the same rating for defeating the Logos as well, for example.
Infinitely above anything a previous weaker incarnation has shown you mean. Saying "infinite is too big of a jump" is literally argument from incredulityIt being a climax doesn't change the fact that the feat is an outlier though. His climax is infinitely above anything he showed prior.
There's no canonical statement that he became way stronger than his previous incarnations. As long as there isn't, there's no reason to assume it's not an outlier when this is literally his only feat on the level.Infinitely above anything a previous weaker incarnation has shown you mean. Saying "infinite is too big of a jump" is literally argument from incredulity
Why do you need a statement when there's a feat which shows he grew stronger?There's no canonical statement that he became way stronger than his previous incarnations. As long as there isn't, there's no reason to assume it's not an outlier when this is literally his only feat on the level.
SPB also needed massive help to destroy the Earth a few issues back. Would you say he should be downgraded to sub Planetary because of this?
Don’t put that idea in peoples heads, they’ll do it.Why do you need a statement when there's a feat which shows he grew stronger?
Go ahead and downgrade SBP and almost every character to below planetary then
Because feats can be Outliers?Why do you need a statement when there's a feat which shows he grew stronger?
Why should I? I was using your own logic, which I pretty clearly disagree with. That planetary thing is also an Outlier.Go ahead and downgrade SBP and almost every character to below planetary then
Fr HAHAHAH dude told us a good ideaDon’t put that idea in peoples heads, they’ll do it.
You need proof of it being an outlierBecause feats can be Outliers?
Why should I? I was using your own logic, which I pretty clearly disagree with. That planetary thing is also an Outlier.
Which I already provided in our last argument with the guidelines and all and you haven't countered that.You need proof of it being an outlier
It is an Outlier by my logic, it is not with yours.If the planetary
Ig yeahWhat does proof of it being an outlier mean anyways? Isn't the proof the fact that we only have one feat on that level?
If someone shows 2 planetary feats and then years later performs a universal feat, would it be more consistent to say "outlier" or he got stronger?Which I already provided in our last argument with the guidelines and all and you haven't countered that.
It is an Outlier by my logic, it is not with yours.
Largely depends on the context, but most of the time, we can say he's Universal due to the fact he has few feats.If someone shows 2 planetary feats and then years later performs a universal feat, would it be more consistent to say "outlier" or he got stronger?
Also, the difference between planetary and universal is finite while the difference between Tier 2 and 1-A is Aleph 2 levels of qualitative superiorities. They are not comparable in the slightest.
No? An Outlier is literally dependant on how many feats on a level the character has, and how much of a jump in power it is. Your example had a jump without even a single qualitative superiority while SPB's jump is equal to Aleph 2 qualitative superiorities.The only difference is that the SBP one is infinitely higher than the example I gave. So your argument is basically "it sounds absurd it must not be true"
Why is it dependent on how much of a jump? And my example only has 1 universal feat, SBP has multiple tier 1 stuffNo? An Outlier is literally dependant on how many feats on a level the character has, and how much of a jump in power it is. Your example had a jump without even a single qualitative superiority while SPB's jump is equal to Aleph 2 qualitative superiorities.
Plus you ignored the rest of my argument with the amount of feats. Stop cherry-picking.
Literally the first guideline-Why is it dependent on how much of a jump?
1 universal feat in relation to 2 planetary feats. And there too, the jump in power is finite, not infinite.And my example only has 1 universal feat, SBP has multiple tier 1 stuff
I very strongly agree with the above points. Let's not be so upgrade-hungry that we insert completely unreliable and ridiculously exaggerated statistics that are derived from one-time instances of extreme plot-induced stupidity.There's no canonical statement that he became way stronger than his previous incarnations. As long as there isn't, there's no reason to assume it's not an outlier when this is literally his only feat on the level.
SPB also needed massive help to destroy the Earth a few issues back. Would you say he should be downgraded to sub Planetary because of this?