• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

DBS: 2-C Universe (Accepted)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
9,982
Reaction score
10,821
Proposal is straightforward but nvm since it's a DB CRT;

DBGT has been accepted to be a alternate Timeline to DBS and is canon it. So it specifically mean that they were composite cosmology at some point in time and to say cosmology is different has no basis and extraordinary to claim, if it got changed after getting branched then it require evidence. The Chouzenshuu treats their macrocosms as identical and covers both GT and Super in general and Shueisha put Super and GT on the same timeline board. Affecting anime, manga as well as being branched and all.

It was also discussed to great length in This CRT and @Planck69 as well shared same thought. The differences to note between GT and DBS are none but only stories and how things are done is different. That's all, nothing much to say. The samething has been accepted for many other verses who shares same mechanism of branching timelines (they have same cosmology throughout all alternate timelines). That's it??? 🦣

Agree: @Golden_Void, @Planck69, @LephyrTheRevanchist, @Lonkitt, @Dalesean027, @Dereck03, @Marvel_Champion_07, @Elizhaa, @LordTracer, @LordGriffin1000, @CloverDragon03, @Eseseso, @Speedster, @SirAlex09, @Quasar002, @TheGreatBanana, @godofice, @Braking, @Guacamolefletcher, @BlastX, @Lord_Farquaad69420, @Gilad_Hyperstar, @The_2nd_Existential_Seed, @Sir_Marvulous, @Dust_Collector, @Apex_Predator_GX, @Vladimir, @VegetaSama1453, @Quantu, @Jaakor48, @TiltedFN, @Da3ggman, @Milly_Rocking_Bandit, @Tarang123, @Arnoldstone18, @Larssx, @Mr.Cinos15, @Baken384, @omegabronic, @Vietthai96, @Zamasu_Chan, @Shadyboi0, @Trihexa102, @TauanVictor, @Matrixxxx, @Spinoirr, @DivineAura44, @Godernet, @BestMGQScalerEver, @FluffyCreatureZ, @SSJGeminiJJ, @NHTkenshin2, @CryoTheMayo, @StrymULTRA, @LuffyRuffy46307, @Padaruyos

Disagree: @Reiner, @Hasty12345
 
Last edited:
I agree...
Now watch as new threads are creates to either downgrade this or upgarde this
What surprises me more is that these cosmology revisions for DB have been....pretty straightforward. For popular verses, there's a lot of room for people to make pretty huge leaps, but the proposals I've seen are rather solid
 
What surprises me more is that these cosmology revisions for DB have been....pretty straightforward. For popular verses, there's a lot of room for people to make pretty huge leaps, but the proposals I've seen are rather solid
I expected at least 5 threads, 10 people getting banned, stranded changes and topic bans...yet, its been good...soo far-
 
What surprises me more is that these cosmology revisions for DB have been....pretty straightforward. For popular verses, there's a lot of room for people to make pretty huge leaps, but the proposals I've seen are rather solid
I really am so glad you helped us fix DB's multiverse, thank you very much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top