-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DBS: 2-C Universe (Accepted)
- Thread starter Reiner04
- Start date
- Status
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #43
- 3,486
- 5,161
Not really SDBH isn’t canon and neither is XV2
But arale who’s canon to both DB manga being aware of the existence of GT despite it not being in the timeline and it being listed as canon in a chronological timeline order of events as an Alternate Timeline is enough proof (also with movies literally being called parallel worlds which timelines are called even in the dbs manga)
- 6,766
- 6,682
1. Parallel timelines of the same universe
2. The Chouzenshuu treats their macrocosms as identical and covers both GT and Super in general
3. Shueisha put Super and GT on the same timeline board
2. The Chouzenshuu treats their macrocosms as identical and covers both GT and Super in general
3. Shueisha put Super and GT on the same timeline board
- 3,486
- 5,161
Yeah I just don’t want people thinking the argument comes from SDBH
- 6,766
- 6,682
Maybe add extra justification because the endgame is 2-C macrocosm and we're just using already discussed and validated reasons
- 7,095
- 3,855
This seems legit, I totally agree.
- 6,766
- 6,682
It should apply to the DBS manga as well since that's also a parallel timeline
- 6,766
- 6,682
Reiner you should bring that up in the OP to make things easier
Dust_Collector
They/Them- 7,585
- 8,226
2-C DBS sounds pretty based to me so count me in agreements
And if that general Tier 2 revision that's planned goes through DBS characters are gonna be monsters thanks to multipliers and scaling chains
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #53
All parallel Timelines are same unless the difference has been established in specified timelines but that's on other to prove.
- 3,486
- 5,161
I meant like would dbs manga scale to fully 2-C since it’d take time for the universe destruction to happen
- 6,630
- 6,814
Well, as long as it's a tier 2 feat that's affecting space time through sheer power, then it should still be Tier 2 even if it takes time I believe (might be wrong).
- 3,486
- 5,161
Yeah it reached the entire macrocosm including Kaioshin realm which is it’s own spacetime
- 6,766
- 6,682
It would've happened in a very short amount of time anyway so yes
- 12,116
- 6,084
@Reiner I lacked to add I , the manga must be added in the tagsProposal is straightforward but nvm since it's a DB CRT;
DBGT has been accepted to be a alternate Timeline to DBS and is canon it. So it specifically mean that they were composite cosmology at some point in time and to say cosmology is different has no basis and extraordinary to claim, if it got changed after getting branched then it require evidence.
It was also discussed to great length in This CRT and @Planck69 as well shared same thought. The differences to note between GT and DBS are none but only stories and how things are done is different. That's all, nothing much to say. The samething has been accepted for many other verses who shares same mechanism of branching timelines (they have same cosmology throughout all alternate timelines). That's it???
Agree: @Planck69, @LephyrTheRevanchist, @Lonkitt, @Dalesean027, @Dereck03 , @Eseseso, @Speedster, @SirAlex09, @Quasar002, @TheGreatBanana, @godofice, @Braking, @Guacamolefletcher, @BlastX, @Lord_Farquaad69420, @Gilad_Hyperstar, @The_2nd_Existential_Seed, @Sir_Marvulous, @Dust_Collector, @Apex_Predator_GX
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #59
- 6,766
- 6,682
So they know that this applies to the DBS manga too bro...
- 6,630
- 6,814
The only reason 3-A wasn't accepted for the feat was purely because the energy of the feat can be quantified (so while destroying instantaneously would be 3-A, destroying it over time would only really require 3-B levels of energy) while Tier 2 feats and above can't really be quantified, so even if it took time to happen (which would require less energy than to destroy something instantaneously), it would still be Tier 2.
- 6,630
- 6,814
This applies to basically everything in the franchise lol.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #64
Done.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #65
Both.
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #66
They are just monkeys at the end of the day.
- 18,545
- 12,860
- 53
- 75
I agree
- 32,835
- 38,104
HALA MADRID, BENZEMA WON A HATTRICK, BARCA MAFIA WAS KILL, ASI ASI ASI GANA MADRID
Last edited:
Ped2018
He/Him- 5,004
- 6,033
- 5,271
- 6,013
- 53
- 75
- 53
- 75
Reiner what is your discord name?
- 9,982
- 10,819
- Thread starter
- #75
𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑎
#7567
- 12,116
- 6,084
If I told you that a 2-A is possible, you wouldn't believe it.
Jason_Courne
He/Him- 1,181
- 1,299
I'm not suprised, but it's kinda funny, from 3-A to High 3-A to 2-C cosmology within the timeframe of a week
- 6,766
- 6,682
High 3-A and 2-C came from the exact same thread
Although High 3-A will be more relevant once all the 2-C stuff is out of the way
- 6,630
- 6,814
I'm not sure if it's scalable...
- 10,116
- 11,488
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
