Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My point is that Shaka died. A hole in what? The fact Shaka died?What's your point? You're now fabricating this weird head canon the UW has gold cloths now to get around glaring holes in your arguemnt.
He was a soul because he had just gotten obliterated. Saori did regenerate, you can see how she had a fatal wound to her throat and also significant blood loss subsequently while Saga carried her in the blanket. It's clear evidence of resurrection, and the extent of Low Godly would come the Gold Saints.Shaka was shown to be a soul prior to going to the UW and by your own admission Saori took her body, where's the regen bro? I don't see anything that qualifies for low godly.
except Shaka's physical body was reduced to nothingness by the AE, and is only shown to be a soul afterwards.
I don't see Ikki not being considered dead for the time he's killed even though he can resurrect in a similar fashion. Or like how in Next Dimension it's still reiterated that Athena was killed in the Hades Arc. The ability to resurrect =/= you aren't considered dead while you're literally dead.again, "alive" is an ill defined term, 8th sense users are also described as dead despite you thinking they have these regen capabilities, Shaka should never be described as dead by your interpretation.
But "alive" and "dead" is only a matter of how you interact with the UW and Hades' law in the greater context of the arc.
why does being called "alive" prove he has a new body? He's explicitly called a soul post being hit by an AE.
Alive by definition just means "not dead", being able to freely travel between the world of the living and world of the dead as a soul doesn't sound like being dead to me.
Definition of ALIVE
having life : not dead or inanimate; still in existence, force, or operation : active; still active in competition with a chance of victory… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
So since Shaka actually fits the definition of alive without having a physical body doesn't actually help you in any way shape or form.
Dohko just says you need to be "alive' not have your physical body.
No, only non 8th sense users were described as "dead", 8th sense users fit the definition of alive just as good as those who enter the UW with 8th sense and a physical body.
Refer to the Shiryu vs. Deathmask and how Shiryu had a different physical copy of the Dragon Cloth there.Wait wait wait, wtf is an UW Cloth
So Saori regenerating a cut is like low regen, I think you're confusing "low" and "low-godly".He was a soul because he had just gotten obliterated. Saori did regenerate, you can see how she had a fatal wound to her throat and also significant blood loss subsequently while Saga carried her in the blanket. It's clear evidence of resurrection, and the extent of Low Godly would come the Gold Saints.
No, but it does contradict them being alive in the way you're describing.I don't see Ikki not being considered dead for the time he's killed even though he can resurrect in a similar fashion. Or like how in Next Dimension it's still reiterated that Athena was killed in the Hades Arc. The ability to resurrect =/= you aren't considered dead while you're literally dead.
never stated.alive with their physical bodies
You've got it backwards.he even says to survive the descent
None of the Gold Saints are considered alive post Hades arc.Sanctuary Arc Aiolos would be considered alive by all means, but he's not.
Crazy how there's no sunlight in the UW but the UW Virgo copy cloth has bathed in the sun since the age of myth.Refer to the Shiryu vs. Deathmask and how Shiryu had a different physical copy of the Dragon Cloth there.
Yeah, it's still low godly regenerateIs regenerating your soul from soul destruction low godly even if you can’t regenerate your physical existence?
How are the dualities not conceptual btw?Alright, I'm dropping transduality. Didn't realize that the dualities in question must be proven to be Conceptual. I thought there was discussion on that somewhere where they didn't have too, but I couldn't find it.
if that's the case, I'd agree to low godly OF the soul.Yeah, it's still low godly regenerate
Is regenerating your soul from soul destruction low godly even if you can’t regenerate your physical existence?
Apparently I'd need to prove that what is stated behaves like a conceotHow are the dualities not conceptual btw?
I see.That's actually soul Manipulation its nor regen iirc. There was a thread on it
Aren't fate and causality all encompassed by the concept of karma?Apparently I'd need to prove that what is stated behaves like a conceot
That's actually soul Manipulation its nor regen iirc. There was a thread on it
It doesn't contradict anything as long as they remain dead as only souls. If they were ever called alive in ND then you might have a point.So Saori regenerating a cut is like low regen, I think you're confusing "low" and "low-godly".
Shaka IS a soul, not "was" a soul, there's 0 evidence he had a physical body post AE.
No, but it does contradict them being alive in the way you're describing.
That was never the reason he gave, keeping their bodies in itself (thus, being alive) was the criteria for "reaching the UW alive"and being there immune to Hades' laws and fight him and his army, which is in itself is self evident in the fact they didn't actively even have the 8th sense while in the UW yet accomplished exactly that, by simply being actually alive.You've got it backwards.
8th sense users can't regenerate their body that's why it's important the bronzes don't die/keep their physical bodies, Shaka's missive demonstrated his resolve to lose his physical existence for Athena.
The bronzes only awaken their 8th sense for a moment via a miracle and Athena's blood, they wouldn't be able to return to the world of the living in the event they lost their body, unlike Shaka who has had the 8th sense for an unknown period of time.
It's literally because they can't regenerate their physical existence that it's important they don't lose it. Shaka's missive was a demonstration of his resolve to Athena.
Shaka exists as a soul from the moment the AE reduces his physical existence to nothingness.
Yet souls aren't considered alive in the story and contextually, Dohko in that scene clearly juxtaposes being alive with the notion of a literal death and not just self awareness or being in operation or whatever alternate definition you're implying.None of the Gold Saints are considered alive post Hades arc.
But as I've proved, they fit the definition of being "alive" just fine in either case.
No because Shaka has never shown resurrection capabilities beyond head canon, and the 3 times he interacted with the world of the living post death he was a soul. That's very clear evidence he can't create a new body. Shura even attempted to strike him to confirm he was dead in which Kurumada very painfully showed us in the most absolute way possible Shaka was a soul.The exact phrase Dohko and Shiryu use is 死ぬことなく生きたまま which is literally "staying alive without dying" (as the Bronze Saints did), and Shiryu says it for Shaka and Saori directly.
go for itIt's crazy how many things could be downgraded or removed with this never showed it or did it when there was no need somehow means they can't logic
Nope. It's just Resurrection. We tried it with Kratos regenerating only his soul from Hope and not regenerating his body. Didn't fly, ended up being Resurrection.Is regenerating your soul from soul destruction low godly even if you can’t regenerate your physical existence?
It won't be regen in any sensible word. It'd be just Resurrection.if that's the case, I'd agree to low godly OF the soul.
Still agree with the removal of low godly as it is now though
What about 5D?It won't be regen in any sensible word. It'd be just Resurrection.
Ok so then I agree resurrection can stay but it’s not resurrection of the body, it’s soul resurrection.It won't be regen in any sensible word. It'd be just Resurrection.
I think NEP is only Type 1 because I didn't see the "turning from nothingness deeper into nothingness" thing they were talking about in the scans. But your comment is more important than mine.Was asked to comment here.
I don't have the time to do a deep dive into this and I have virtually no knowledge on the series, however, the canon blog seems fine, and I think NEP for the 9th sense is ok but I think those knowledgeable in SS would give more valid response to 8th sense stuff plus you asking the wrong person about higher dimensional stuff. Though the comments made by Executor_N0 look valid regarding it.
Fair enough.I think NEP is only Type 1 because I didn't see the "turning from nothingness deeper into nothingness" thing they were talking about in the scans. But your comment is more important than mine.
What are the other ways?Being more nothing than another nothing isn't the only way to get NEP Type 2. It's just the easy way
But for that you need a little more statement. Sorry man this looks like a clean NEP1.If the inexistence is so ******* inexistent to the point where it's more "older" than a type 1 concept (Something independent of the existence itself) than NEP Type 2 is fine
Type 2 it's just inexistence in a more abstract level, where you can't just define the inexistence as simple as "the opposite of creation"
I looked over the OP and think it's fine.
Are there any rebuttals I should be aware of? I'd rather not read the whole thread to find them.
Sorry for tagging, do we need more staff input? It seems 3 staff have agreed.In regards to if the "higher dimension" is literal, considering the explanations about the characters becoming "beyond time and space" and "able to exist in multiple dimensions at once", it really seems that it's a merge of soul ascension to a higher metaphysical plane of existence and also a physical one since it's stated to be an existence that transcends the limitations of time and space.
Since it mentions being "beyond time and space" and "exists in multiple dimensions at once" (referring to the multiverse), it seems to be beyond the 4-dimensional space-time of a single universe, which could be 5D.
But there are those who do not accept Acausality Type 5, 5D, NEP2 and TD. So at least I didn't see any staff participating in Aca5 and 5D.Sorry for tagging, do we need more staff input? It seems 3 staff have agreed.
But there are those who do not accept Acausality Type 5, 5D, NEP2 and TD. So at least I didn't see any staff participating in Aca5 and 5D.