There's a lot to say here, so I'm going to reply to the key points people are using to oppose the upgrade (not everything because a lot of it involves stating things ad nauseum).
"Higher plane" isn't the only thing being used to give the verse Low 1-C. Looking at this detail in isolation from the other respective aspects that demonstrate Low 1-C is an incredibly dishonest tactic to make what's being proposed seem bad. The analogy itself is a false equivalence regardless. Madoka's case of ascending to a "higher plane" is strictly in regard to her conceptual nature when the OP has shown there is obviously more than just that here.
Also, none of this "What about another verse?" unless you can show it was rejected for reasons akin to or greater to the ones provided here. Something not being on the profiles doesn't necessarily mean it got rejected; it could just be a case of negligence.
Such a thing does matter when the Chaos Force has statements that would let it transcend the multiverse's space-time. Higher planes aren't contextually such by default, these are characteristics we ascribe to dimensionality typically.
Outside, as a preposition,
can refer to transcendence too. Not sure where you got the idea it cannot.
Nothing about the scans posted is vague. For one, the beyond space-time scan is in reference to it being above the multiverse, it's that simple. Pretty easy to accept when there are scans showing how it's described as literally
transcending (something you somehow managed to ignore as Mav even pointed out). Secondly, the others are just talking about how it's a superior or inconceivable plane of existence. Saying things are "vague" as a means to discredit them is you literally just trying to dog whistle to people who aren't certain about the context of the panels being used for the upgrade. Describe why they are vague instead of just labeling it as such.
The supporting evidence is listed in the OP. You guys are focusing on one or two aspects (devoid of context might I add) of this entire upgrade in your entire reply to say it's wrong. The fact that
people have to ask all of you to stop doing this is incredibly telling of this issue.
That's a horrible reason to reject a CRT. Saying "it will affect this verse" is literally not an argument. Okay, sure, let's say that it does give DBH Low 1-C? What now, huh? Absolutely nothing because this "point" adds absolutely no substance to this thread, moving on.
Once again, looking at something in isolation and being willfully ignorant of other aspects that support the idea. Also, yet another "it will affect more verses!" argument.
That's not the entire reason for it to be Low 1-C. Read. the. post.
I was originally going to address My area's stuff too, but it's literally just repeating these arguments over and over again or repeating his own point about an incorrect take about site policies. It's somewhat disappointing to see that the bandwagon of reasons to deny this CRT came from people literally just repeating their points ad nauseum, refusing to look at things in a wider context, misrepresenting numerous ideas, or using non-arguments as a way to deny something that most people agree is straightforward.
