• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Can R>F get disqualify due to being able to take damage at hp bar in the gameplay stages?

Weaver261

He/Him
382
217
Let's say a realm is stated to be qualitively inferior to the base reality. And someone from base reality went into that realm and play some challenges. It's just normal combat gameplay with stages as you can see here. And no matter how damage they took in there, their hp bar remained unchange in base reality. There's no mention of life threatening dangers to base reality. It's also called as performances which are written into the book. The book is the medium between base reality and that realm. Can R>F get disqualify becuz of player character taking damages in that realm?
 
Your usage of Traveller's case is extremely misleading; Traveller and Paimon are immersed into the world in their true physical forms, they already left base reality.
 
Last edited:
Like how? In what way? Is it specifically mentioned in the story?
Weaver, this is ridiculous. You obviously know it yourself; stop promulgating false narratives on headcanons, and trying to fool people who aren't knowledgable in the verse.
 
Weaver, this is ridiculous. You obviously know it yourself; stop promulgating false narratives on headcanons, and trying to fool people who aren't knowledgable in the verse.
Okay. This is really an outright accusation while I'm here just wanting to know if that can disqualify or not. If you have problems with my question, you can feel free to add additional informations. But I must say I'm not impress.
 
Okay. This is really an outright accusation while I'm here just wanting to know if that can disqualify or not. If you have problems with my question, you can feel free to add additional informations. But I must say I'm not impress.


The Traveller entered the Imaginarium Theatre, with their true forms, we literally see them in there; absolutely no mentioning that they created an avatar to access it or their true forms reside in a lobby, or anything.

As for your question, that is completely different from the case of the Traveller's, no, it does not disqualify you for R>F because you create a non-1-A avatar that is separate from your true 1-A form.
 
The Traveller entered the Imaginarium Theatre, with their true forms, we literally see them in there; absolutely no mentioning that they created an avatar to access it or their true forms reside in a lobby, or anything.

As for your question, that is completely the case from that of Traveller's, no, it does not disqualify you for R>F because you create a non-1-A avatar that is separate from your true 1-A form.

Your video doesn't even includes Traveler. If they went inside the Theatre with their real physical body, their hp bar should be reduced. You talked about how taking damage inside the realm disqualify R>F. Moreover, you can only use traveler inside the lobby and you can play gamemode without using traveler at all while the one who opened the book and access the Theatre is traveler. It indicate that the gameplay can be done even without Traveler presence in the Theatre
 
The Traveller is obviously taking the form of those characters because of game mechanics. Health bar is also an entirely game mechanics thing; it only gives information to the mortality of the Traveller.

Also, are you literally ignoring this, where we literally see Traveller's physical form in the realm? This has been on the profiles, for scaling.

 
The Traveller is obviously taking the form of those characters because of game mechanics
I think you are wrong. Here is the voice overs of characters who participated in gameplays. It shows traveler isn't assuming the form of others. To be honest, I don't even know why taking damage in the gameplay leads to disqualification of R>F. That's why I am asking here if that kind of logic is correct or not. Also, the timestamp you attached isn't about what you want to show.
 
I think you are wrong. Here is the voice overs of characters who participated in gameplays. It shows traveler isn't assuming the form of others.
Oh, okay, so it wasn't Traveller but shit tons of other playable characters who are beyond the reaches of Mondstadt, in entire different nations who should be doing their own shit, suddenly ended up in a god-knows-where alternate dimension that is magically accessed through a book, without any explanation as to why they are there. Still, by that logic, let's assume an example: Alhaitham; Alhaitham was still harmed by monsters in the Imaginarium Theatre -- oh no, he got harmed by a fictional entity! Womp womp; in other words, R>F disqualifier.
To be honest, I don't even know why taking damage in the gameplay leads to disqualification of R>F. That's why I am asking here if that kind of logic is correct or not. Also, the timestamp you attached isn't about what you want to show.
It's not even in-game mechanics, it's a world in-lore Traveller can access; of course, you use gameplay to fight monsters because it is a game.

Also, do you think a fictional character can just jump out of the screen to attack you? No. Traveller was harmed by those "fictional" monsters of those realms. End of the story, RIP any possibility of R>F.
 
I think you have presented your point of view on this. I will just wait other staffs opinions or knowledgeable members' cuz this won't go anywhere
 
Back
Top