Book Of Bill - Gravity Falls (Part 1.5 , Cosmology update)

[Ezaru]

I'd like to add the fact that I'm waiting for the 1-A TTGL CRT to be completed first, because as discussed in DMs with @TheOrangeGuy09, we've found another possible anti feat (that being Ford describing the lower comic world as 2-Dimensional, and altering the comic alters the world in it, too, similar to how affecting the card affects the multiverse).

If that's indeed considered an anti feat (if 1-A TTGL is rejected), then I wouldn't mind Dennis being just 7D or 14D, however I'd avoid double standards.

Besides I think that the 11D thing would need more elaboration on why it's considered acceptable, it being the fact that beings inhabiting these dimensions possibly hints at these dimensions not being compactified but actually inhabitable.

How is that only the people who don't know the verse disagree lmfao? Is this a raid?

No. Bill and TB physically moved the card holder containing the card, that's pretty much an AP feat, that however is a complete outlier for obvious af reason.

I haven't "disagreed" or anything

I am asking questions

I know the series but am not familiar with the new stuff

Yes, I get it's an AP feat

So is someone jumping out of a comic to beat up the author, but something like that still counts against 1-A r>f as far as I know

The entire point of having specific guidelines is so that 1-A isn't applied to verses where the creations are able to interact with the creator

Right?

Buddy, before the book his Mindscape form was simply Unknown solely due to the fact that 2D beings can interact with 3D beings in GF.

Shaking the card is an AP feat. Also it doesn't make sense for him to even have such Range of Dimensional Travel, as otherwise why didn't infinite amount of parallel Bills ever interfere with each other?

OK, 14D Base Bill and Time Baby! (His Weirdmageddon Form is infinitely superior to his own base and was struggling against the 12D mech, and his rift cannot interfere with infinite amount of other Bills)

What I mean is maybe dimensional travel of this sort has different rules in GF

Like, Farnsworth shaking the box Universe in Futurama isn't an AP feat as far as I am aware

Like the fact is, if there's a verse where a guy Bob makes a universe in a book, and the people in the book are like 9-B, and they jump out and beat him up, that would be an antifeat for 1-A Bob, right?

I wouldn't call it an "outlier" for the 9-B characters, I would just say that r>f doesn't give power in this verse

Do you get what I mean?

 

[TheOrangeGuy09]

What I mean is maybe dimensional travel of this sort has different rules in GF

Even if it is dimensional travel, why didn’t any of infinite Bills interfere with each other’s timeline, despite being able to go outside of even the collection of infinite multiverses?

Like, Farnsworth shaking the box Universe in Futurama isn't an AP feat as far as I am aware

And shaking the Nightmare Realm is an AP feat for GF on this website.

Like the fact is, if there's a verse where a guy Bob makes a universe in a book, and the people in the book are like 9-B, and they jump out and beat him up, that would be an antifeat for 1-A Bob, right?

I wouldn't call it an "outlier" for the 9-B characters, I would just say that r>f doesn't give power in this verse

Actually, it would be an outlier for 9-B characters. And keep in mind, Bill specifically mentions that Dennis and his dog are like gods that can do anything with the card and even destroy them all.

Do you get what I mean?

Yeah, a buncha whataboutism and incorrect logic.

 

[StrymULTRA]

Like the fact is, if there's a verse where a guy Bob makes a universe in a book, and the people in the book are like 9-B, and they jump out and beat him up, that would be an antifeat for 1-A Bob, right?

No, it's an outlier!

 

[Ezaru]

No, it's an outlier!

Aren't those literally the standards? Like if there's contradictions for qualitative superiority, then they are considered anti-feats against the r>f

 

[StrymULTRA]

Aren't those literally the standards? Like if there's contradictions for qualitative superiority, then they are considered anti-feats against the r>f

If the "anti-feat" is deemed completely invalid to begin with due to being an outlier, then we should ignore it completely.

 

[Ezaru]

If the "anti-feat" is deemed completely invalid to begin with due to being an outlier, then we should ignore it completely.

What is the difference between an antifeat and an outlier tho?

Like you could just say any example of non "outer" characters interacting with "outer" characters is an outlier by definition

Even if it is dimensional travel, why didn’t any of infinite Bills interfere with each other’s timeline, despite being able to go outside of even the collection of infinite multiverses?

Does leaving the card have to imply he can move to any other part of the card?

Could you post the actual feat?

I can't seem to find it online

]And shaking the Nightmare Realm is an AP feat for GF on this website.

Right, but that's because he shakes it normally, isn't it?

, it would be an outlier for 9-B characters. And keep in mind, Bill specifically mentions that Dennis and his dog are like gods that can do anything with the card and even destroy them all.

Right, but that could be because he can rip/shake the card

Could for example, Dennis think about the rules of the universe in the card and change them

Yeah, a buncha whataboutism and incorrect logic.

I don't see how asking about standards is whataboutism

 

[StrymULTRA]

What is the difference between an antifeat and an outlier tho?

Like you could just say any example of non "outer" characters interacting with "outer" characters is an outlier by definition

EXACTLY! Glad you're seeing it.

Could you post the actual feat?

I can't seem to find it online

Just read the blog omfg. You're arguing off sheer ignorance rn.

 

[Ezaru]

EXACTLY! Glad you're seeing it.

That isnt how this site works, as far as I am aware under the new standards, any feat where a lower character interacts with a higher reality character ( in the r>f sense) is considered an anti-feat for the higher character

Just read the blog omfg. You're arguing off sheer ignorance rn.

I'm not really arguing against the feat, I'm trying to determine if what you are saying makes sense site standards wise

Edit: So I found the feat in the blog, thanks, I don't see how this isn't a blatant anti-feat by our standards

 

[StrymULTRA]

That isnt how this site works, as far as I am aware under the new standards, any feat where a lower character interacts with a higher reality character ( in the r>f sense) is considered an anti-feat for the higher character

Bill does not just interact, he literally physically moves the thing holding the multiverse. Pretty big difference.

I'm not really arguing against the feat, I'm trying to determine if what you are saying makes sense site standards wise

You said multiple times you have no idea of what the feat is and to not be aware of the new content.

So you should preferably at least be informed by reading the blog, because you're just spamming with fluff.

 

[SweetDao]

I mean, can't we just settle on a disagreement and let staff comes and examine stuff? It's not like that topic wasn't brought up earlier.

 

[StrymULTRA]

Isn't it hilarious how only people who don't know the verse disagree (2)?

No like come on...

Anyway I'll wait, yes.

 

[StrymULTRA]

Imma just say that if 1-A is rejected technically 1-A TTGL is also cooked