- 15,266
- 6,995
- Thread starter
- #81
It being some LN or something.Dude he fcking ate that shit like actually and claimed he was messing with it lmao what more do you want
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It being some LN or something.Dude he fcking ate that shit like actually and claimed he was messing with it lmao what more do you want
I haven't really been given scans on this from strym so if you could send this that'd be great.Dude he fcking ate that shit like actually and claimed he was messing with it lmao what more do you want
Bill tastes the concept of lifeI haven't really been given scans on this from strym so if you could send this that'd be great.
He literally tasted it as said from Shion, idk why you keep ignoring this.I haven't really been given scans on this from strym so if you could send this that'd be great.
You didn't send me the links you kinda just said it so i had nothing to watch, but I will watch the stuff now that I have it.He literally tasted it as said from Shion, idk why you keep ignoring this.
Dude, read the P&A Page he listed above.My issue with Type 1 CM is that he is not manipulating the concept in anyway, it just doesn't make sense, so I still disagree
So you're telling me... you're trying to use a quote where he is basically just gloating and being eccentric as a means to justify him having control over the concept of meaning?
"Not inheritenly built into the universe"Being outside the physical world =/= Being an abstraction that is inherently independent of reality. It's simple, a person or any object can be fundamentally outside of the physical
What do you want to say? Pls say it clearly."Not inheritenly built into the universe"
Did anyone in here atleast see the scans?
I am not using a single quote to justify this, I am using all these quotes to show that Bill possibly has some sort of control over these concepts and then using the fact that HE ATE ONE OF THEM as a way to support my argument further into a full ability.So you're telling me... you're trying to use a quote where he is basically just gloating and being eccentric as a means to justify him having control over the concept of meaning?
Wow, Bill with Supergenius Intelligence appears to be having flowery languange in his statement when it is very clear that his explanation about 'meaning" is objective.Yeah no, I hate to use this, but it's such a clear case of flowery language that I'm surprised this is the conclusion you came to.
NPI.that does not mean he can manipulate it, calling back to my example of what if I were to die than be resuscitated.
Having super genius intellect does not give you a magic ticket to never use flowery language.Wow, Bill with Supergenius Intelligence appears to be having flowery languange in his statement when it is very clear that his explanation about 'meaning" is objective.
The "meaning" in there is stated to be not built in (as in) the universe/reality, with the creation being made by "consciousness mind" (most of the refutation is already been made for this, you need to see the full thread before jumping into conclusion)What do you want to say? Pls say it clearly.
In a serious manner, he was never using flowery languange, his explanation is objective and pretty much literal.Having super genius intellect does not give you a magic ticket to never use flowery language.
I said he used flowery language, not that he lied, those are two different things so don’t confuse them.Why would Bill lie where he was just explaining what he was doing in Weirdmageddon? The quote is obviously trying to show the viewers how serious of a threat this is.
I don’t have to, and I don’t think pretending that I do is a good argument, especially when those arguments and quotes you sent don’t seem all too good for evidence.Again this is supported so much, you have to call ALL OF THEM flowery language to reject it.
Flowery Language is exaggeration and lies.I said he used flowery language, not that he lied, those are two different things so don’t confuse them.
Your entire rebuttal was that it was flowery language and a lie in your opinion, I objectively cannot argue back since its subjective. So I guess we should move on and see the remaining votes from others.I don’t have to, and I don’t think pretending that I do is a good argument, especially when those arguments and quotes you sent don’t seem all too good for evidence.
Yes on the former, no on the latter.Flowery Language is exaggeration and lies.
I don't think this relates to CMThe "meaning" in there is stated to be not built in (as in) the universe/reality, with the creation being made by "consciousness mind" (most of the refutation is already been made for this, you need to see the full thread before jumping into conclusion)
Literally how.I don't think this relates to CM
Can you explain a little more buddy? Am I missing something?Literally how.
Bill basically explains that for him, the meaning of concepts is something that isn't present in the physical universe, and is determined by conscious judgement, and each concepts, other than a meaning, has also definition, function, and taste (with him even tasting life itself lol).Can you explain a little more buddy? Am I missing something?
Oke dokeConsidering the previous upgrade, I decided to make this second one for Bill Cipher, as I think that after his tiering, we can how talk about other factors.
Hax
The first thing is the abilities of Bill, given that there are some important stuff I'd like to talk. I made a prettier P&A section for Bill here, with some changes I'd like to discuss...
At most I'd warrent a possibly "Meaning has no meaning" could just be a fancy way to describe how reality is weird, rather than him literally changing meaning itselfType 1 Conceptual Manipulation
The argument in short is that "meaning" in Gravity Falls, as explained from Bill himself, is a concept that is shaped from human consciousness and isn't built in the universe. This is a direct reference to the Jungian Archetypes, which are essentially patterns that exists outside of the physical world and that are within the subconscious, which everything and everyone indirectly uses as basic models to shape other ideas (hence why they're accepted as being Type 1 concepts).
Bill should have the full NPI on Type 1 concepts in his Mindscape key, as he did taste said meaning, and full Type 1 CM in his Physical Form, as the Weirdmageddon has completely altered reality to the point that meaning has no meaning, implying that the Weirdmageddon can also alter these archetypes.
SureSpace Survival
Bill for pretty obvious reasons can survive in space. Thus I removed the resistance to Extreme Cold and Cosmic Radiations in favor of Space Survival (duh).
Logically yeah, but define unconventionalResistance to Transmutation
Bill also should resist Transmutation for the same reason he is resisting petrification, as if he can leave his body after that it was petrified, nothing says that he can't do the same if it's reduced to stuff like glass or paper.
Living in the nightmare realm doesn't mean immunity from time manipulation, my house could be devoid of time but it doesn't mean that I am immune from time, why he even has Acausality in the first place confuses me.Resistance to Time Manipulation
As the Nightmare Realm is a place that is totally outside time, laws, casuality and physics due to it being outside all the universes, Bill should also not be affected from time due to him having made the Nightmare Realm his home, which is already explained from his Type 4 Acausality that is already in his profile.
No, other's have listed reasonings against it, but at most it'd only scale to attack speedSpeed
The funny part is speed. The entire thing is listed here, but I'll list it anyway.
We all know that the Dimensional Rift would have destroyed the fabric of existence with a giant explosion. This would be already infinite speed due to the Nightmare Realm being an infinite-sized Bulk space that encompasses within itself an infinite multiverse.
Bill should be comparable to the Rift due to him not only having created the Rift, but also having his powers linked to and empowered from the Rift, other than also sustaining it, as when he dies, the Rift also disappears along with all of its effects, implying some UES kind of stuff going on here.
This would also affect Shacktron for obvious reasons.
AgreeLittle nitpick, every Gravity Falls character should have the Disney category, given that it's still owned from it as also pointed in our Disney Page, only Shacktron has it fsr
Because he naturally is devoid of these things, similar to how NR itself is Aca 4.Living in the nightmare realm doesn't mean immunity from time manipulation, my house could be devoid of time but it doesn't mean that I am immune from time, why he even has Acausality in the first place confuses me.
Him not being frozen solid when he gets transmuted.Logically yeah, but define unconventional
Being outside or not being there =/= being independent of the nature of reality by its abstract natureBill basically explains that for him, the meaning of concepts is something that isn't present in the physical universe, and is determined by conscious judgement, and each concepts, other than a meaning, has also definition, function, and taste (with him even tasting life itself lol).
Hence why I got the idea that is CM.
Well... I too am a bit unsure of it, I just assumed that being outside of reality means being independent given that if the universe explodes, the concept would still be fine, no?Being outside or not being there =/= being independent of the nature of reality by its abstract nature
I mean this.
But it’s never stated that he himself is devoid of these things, just that he lives in the NR which is, is there proof of him existing in a similar state to the nightmare realm?Because he naturally is devoid of these things, similar to how NR itself is Aca 4.
OkHim not being frozen solid when he gets transmuted.
If the only this "physical world" destroyed, it doesn't even need to be type 1 to be not affected.Well... I too am a bit unsure of it, I just assumed that being outside of reality means being independent given that if the universe explodes, the concept would still be fine, no?
Wait really? I always though of Type 2 as "if you blow up the universe, the concept ends too".If the only this "physical world" destroyed, it doesn't even need to be type 1 to be not affected.
Well, if meaning is created by conscious judgment, if reality is destroyed and all the beings doing the judging die along with it, then the meaning would cease as there would be no judge to sustain the meaning, therefore not a type 1 concept.Well... I too am a bit unsure of it, I just assumed that being outside of reality means being independent given that if the universe explodes, the concept would still be fine, no?
"It depends";Wait really? I always though of Type 2 as "if you blow up the universe, the concept ends too".
That wouldnt only be blowing the universe, that would be blowing the universe and killing the humans in itWell, if meaning is created by conscious judgment, if reality is destroyed and all the beings doing the judging die along with it, then the meaning would cease as there would be no judge to sustain the meaning, therefore not a type 1 concept.
I suppose Type 2 kinda of works, ig?"It depends";
If what disappears is only the physical world, there is no need to type 1, type 2 enough.
If what is called the "universe" is the entire reality itself with all its aspects in the verse, this would be type 1.
Basically, this is considered as reality, but the fact that it says "outside physical world" here is actually the biggest reason why this is not type 1.
Because, as I said, above all, being outside of a physical space or realm does not mean that you are independent of reality with your abstract nature.
Humans are a part of the universe.That wouldnt only be blowing the universe, that would be blowing the universe and killing the humans in it
One minute? Isn't the "universe" here really the entire reality in the verse? If it's not, I don't think it is even type 2 or not.I suppose Type 2 kinda of works, ig?
Given the "universe" is literally just one of the many infinite others in the verse, so heh.
When we say destory the universe in concepts we mean destroy the space in it to make the concepts not exist. Killing the humans is a addition to that destruction which is not fair to use as an argumentHumans are a part of the universe.
What?One minute? Isn't the "universe" here really the entire reality in the verse?
Why wouldn't it be?If it's not, I don't think it is even type 2 or not.
Yes I am. Plus other than Bill eating it, the Weirdmageddon (which was affecting the whole cosmology), said that "Meaning has no Meaning", implying he'd affecting said concepts.Man, you're sure you're explain it correct, right? Also is there a manipulation feat?