- 8,170
- 2,204
This is what the purpose of the thread is, to discuss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed he didn't make the galaxy room, since it's Gremmy's technique. But he did indeed make the contents of that dimension so i'd appreciate if you'd stop saying he didn't.Matthew Schroeder said:There is no proof that the Soul King made the Galaxy Room or that there even is an actual galaxy there. As such we cannot give a possibly 3-C or even a possibly far higher based on it. That's out of the question and just borders on wishful thinking.
But galaxies do look like that too, Matthew.Matthew Schroeder said:There is no proof that the Soul King made the Galaxy Room or that there even is an actual galaxy there. As such we cannot give a possibly 3-C or even a possibly far higher based on it. That's out of the question and just borders on wishful thinking.
fixedShadowWarrior1999 said:Dude resize that image.
You're literally against it based off a what-if it's a star cluster lmao.ProfessorKukui4Life said:"It could be"
Which is nothing but a guestimate. Worth nothing more than a "At least 4-C, possibly higher".
Im sorry, but im not agreeing with tier 3 anything here based off guestimates and what ifs as justifications.
Based off? I don't see anything in the tiering system suggesting this.ShadowWarrior1999 said:@Sigurd An irregular galaxy would just be 4-A.
Please cease the Appeal to Motivation. That's simply unecessary and is undermining your own words earlier wherein you were deriding the thread's failing civility. Seeing an Admin try to stoke the fire is pretty depressing.Matthew Schroeder said:The moment someone other than the Bleach fans actively pushing for 3-C even acknowledge it is the moment someone will push for 3-A. Just like as soon as 4-C was deemed okay the push for 4-A started.
The intent that some people on this thread has is transparent as crystal and I do not take to wild and nonsense speculations which have yet to be proven on over three hundred posts as fact.
Matthew Schroeder said:snip
Oh its not like Galaxy Room explicity showed a star cluster to make it more than a what if..Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:You're literally against it based off a what-if it's a star cluster lmao.
Or an irregular galaxy, which has no defining shape like I showed you hence it being possible.ProfessorKukui4Life said:Oh its not like Galaxy Room explicity showed a star cluster to make it more than a what if..
Which not only has no evidence of being one, but it still wouldnt be 3-C even if that was to be the case.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:Or an irregular galaxy, which has no defining shape like I showed you hence it being possible.
Tbh all irregular galaxy in our local system is very small compared to milky way galaxy, perhaps it will help your proposal if you can find irregular galaxy with comparable size to milky way galaxy.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:Or an irregular galaxy, which has no defining shape like I showed you hence it being possible.ProfessorKukui4Life said:Oh its not like Galaxy Room explicity showed a star cluster to make it more than a what if..
If this is true, then "At least 4-A, likely higher" should be the rating.ProfessorKukui4Life said:Irregular galaxies are literally the smallest of galaxies, heck the milky way has 2 of them orbiting it.
So even if Sigurd is right and what we see in the Galaxy Room is indeed an irregular galaxy, its still not 3-C as its lower than baseline 3-C, which is our Milky Way.
If by "irregular" you mean not milky way sized at the very least it's not 3-CSigurd Snake in The Eye said:If irregular galaxies aren't considered 3-C, i'll stop. Although I don't see anything on the tiering system suggesting that.
There is proof the Soul King made it, it exists in Soul Society and is made of Reishi.Matthew Schroeder said:They made a starry sky. They are 4-A. No At least and no likely higher. There is no proof that the Soul King made that thing whether it is a star cluster or a galaxy, which we don't know either.
Tbh:AguilaR101 said:If by "irregular" you mean not milky way sized at the very least it's not 3-C
Creating one is High 4-C, destroying one is 4-A.IMadeThisOn8-1-2017 said:Hell even is the rating of a star cluster?