- 31,192
- 27,380
- Thread starter
- #161
I don't think it improves the accuracy to ignore a dozen visuals of the Seireitei and assume that Kubo's sole intent for the size of the Seireitei was in a statement he gave to Yoruichi really early on in the manga.What exactly is our reason for using a panel and not using expressions? Except that expressions give very high panels give very low
Somebody on the previous page said this:
I will just point out that some of the scans used in the OP aren't even consistent with each other. No one can seriously believe this (not sure why this is even in the OP since its from early Bleach where Kubo hasn't even properly designed the visuals for the Seireitei yet)
It's okay to believe Kubo hadn't properly designed the Seireitei at this point so visuals of it can be ignored, but we have to accept that Kubo properly planned the Seireitei to be a thousand kilometers wide at this point?
Doesn't the more recent information in the manga take precedent usually? If Kubo designed the Seireitei in the Thousand Year Blood War Arc to be a city and drew it fairly consistently throughout the arc, then can't we read into his intentions there a bit? What's so wrong about that - using what Kubo himself drew for the Seireitei in the last arc of the manga?
EDIT: Let me put it another way. You say that the visuals are inconsistent with each so we can dismiss all of the visuals. Then you bring up the statement and say "Nothing contradicts the statement".... Except for all of the visuals that you just got rid of earlier. By getting rid of the visuals for not perfectly agreeing with each other, you remove evidence that can be used against the statement-based calculation.
Last edited: