Anyone who has read the thread can tell this is completely false. A lot of evidence was given to back up the current ratings.
The statements aren't inconsistent at all. All of them imply big besides 2 that can be quantified which are Yoruichi's statement which will have a random value depending on how fast you want to say they're going with breaks and etc but still massive. The other quantifiable one outright gives the distances between the two gates. Which Ovy stated in the 1st page both can be equal using certain speeds and etc. If anything the only one that really matters would be the move statement since a number is outright given.
I dont think you understand what i mean, I'm not arguing against them BEING BIG, I literally say that the series implies it to be much larger than we are shown. you can have a 1000 statements saying a mountain is big but if that big size changes every 1000 statements it would still be Inconsistent.
I know. I was explaining to you how there is 0 inconsistency between the statements suggesting it's massive and that the one with the most weight that is quantifiable is the one with the distances between the two gates. Which will match the Yoruichi statement depending on what value you use.
You go ahead and do that seeing as I never suggested anything like this whatsoever.
Blatant lie and you're the only one who supports this.
So we have inconsistent pixel measurements and the expression in the movie, so it makes more sense to discuss which of them we should use and why.
We are already doing that, by using Yoruichi's statement that takes the fewer assumptions between the statements and it also likely the middle ground (with the higher ones being like the movie one or the 600-2000 districts one).
Then I dont have an Inherent Issue.
Which leads us to the same conclusion previous discussions already had - to keep the current ratings.
Cyberblader mentioned that value, based on the "days spent travelling inside Seireitei" quote from the Rukia novel.
Comes from measuring 75 km pixels
Please read the statement yourself. This is talking about the distance between a gate and squad 7 barracks lol...
the novel sigurd mentioned
It's also only for the distance between a gate and the barracks of the 7th Division, as Sigurd said above, and not the diameter of Seireitei.
Actually, the first chapter that says mountains are in Seireitei’s 13th barracks and not outside is during the Arrancar Invasion (chapter 230) Arc and another chapter during the Fullbring arc shows the same mountains again (in chapter 479) and later the light novel that is after chapter 686 mentions mountains again in the 7th barracks. Consistent, unlike the scans that don’t even show the “Rukongai” district outside of Seireitei something that exist in statements yet the authors didn’t draw it. The districts that weren’t drawn are mentioned in the final arc.
There are even more visuals showing those mountains not being inside the borders of the Seireitei. Wouldn't the higher number of showings be the more consistent out of all these?
Damage is hard to understand when there are mountains mentioned in both manga and novels
Those are different mountains. Far away from Rukongai. Didn’t you read the scan where is says that they are in “Seiretei”?
Doesn't that what you say we want the images to be used and the images are not consistent, justifies us?
@ShadowbokunoheroWe should use the direct size told to use in the movie. Not because is canon, or not canon. But because the information in the movie came directly from the author's source material.
There is a lot of confirmation in this interview that everything in the movie was approved by the author of the series. You have to make an account to read the interview.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
What I'm saying is that I don't think we should be using just the Yoruichi statement to get a figure for the Seireitei's size.
What exactly is our reason for using a panel and not using expressions? Except that expressions give very high panels give very low
