- 2,631
- 130
No, your cero argument does not stand. It does not behave like light at all, because it does not refract, reflect and it can change direction. Calling it "light" is not a reference to the scientific interpretation of light as waves.
Furthermore, when speaking of feats described as "world," it is either the planet, the universe or something else. There is not sufficient evidence for universe and thus planet works. Furthermore, it fits with the other feats of the verse.
Furthermore, when speaking of feats described as "world," it is either the planet, the universe or something else. There is not sufficient evidence for universe and thus planet works. Furthermore, it fits with the other feats of the verse.