- 9,381
- 6,676
- Thread starter
- #81
It was pluralism
He didn't subject to "natural Law" but laws
If u're saying his Gravity is what he was referencing that's an ideology for singularity
And going with ur "he referenced Gravity" that would then mean Gravity is one of the Law amongst other indirectly referenced Laws
yeah I thought he was doing that singular stuff by accident until he does it like 3 more times to force his point across.