Ben 10: Space beyond (Low 1-C upgrade)

[Hellformer]

Based on my current understanding, I do agree that the tree rating should match that of the MCU tree due to the same context and mechanics to reach an uncountable amount.

@DarkDragonMedeus
@Planck69

Thoughts?

Would this upscale space beyond to 6-D?

 

[Firestorm808]

Would this upscale space beyond to 6-D?

Maybe. I have to converse on it with the others.

 

[Planck69]

I don't mind the branching multiverse being uncountably infinite. Agree with Firestorm808 on that.

 

[Karllkraft]

Her evren, ötesindeki uzayda var olur.
Ötesindeki Uzay, evrenin sınırlarının ötesine uzanan ve sonsuz sayıda evreni kapsayan sonsuz bir kara boşluktur. Her evren, zaten 4-B olan ayrı bir uzay-zaman sürekliliği olarak kabul edilir, peki sen ne yapıyorsun?

Bunun qs olduğunu sana düşündüren şey tam olarak nedir?

 

[Gendolfgg1]

i agree

 

[Georredannea15]

@DarkDragonMedeus @Planck69 Thoughts on the revised description below:

The Space Beyond depicts a higher temporal dimension than those of the branching timelines. The banching timelines exist inside the Space Beyond. In Ben 10 Omniverse Season 6 Episode 1, Vilgax uses the Chronosapien Time Bomb to destroy all branching timelines except No Watch Ben's Timeline. The Space Beyond was unaffected by the CTB and the destruction of the timeline branches. It is not bound by the temporality of the branching timelines. Since a Chronosapien's time powers only work with a higher temporal dimension existing, Clockwork was able to use his abilities with the Space Beyond's Temporal Dimension to bring back the other lower temporal dimensions.

Yes, that's actually the case. Not more.

I will revise this later, already inclusively, but this is not in any way evidence of hypertimeline or extra-dimensional temporal dimension, no.

Basically a timeline that is independent of other timelines or temporal dimension is not affected by this and basically both can cover the same linear axis, we have already mentioned this in the "temporal dimensions revision" I made... In short, this is not appropriate.


But anyway, just go ahead. I'm not going to discuss this further here, I'm just thinking of opening a comprehensive thread with quotes and pages, because both the uncountable infinite timelines argument and the hypertimeline arguments are wrong.(Btw, uncountable infinite timeline actually means hypertimeline because only higher dimensional temporal dimensions can hold uncountable infinite number of timelines, so I'm not sure why you make a structure that already has this with 5-D, What you use for 6-D is basically already in 5-D, but anyway...)

And yes, basically what I'm going to do is to call the tier 1 experts directly in the thread i will made, don't get me wrong, I don't want to have a constant discussion and loop, I just want it to be concluded as quickly as possible

 

[Firestorm808]

Yes, that's actually the case. Not more.

I will revise this later, already inclusively, but this is not in any way evidence of hypertimeline or extra-dimensional temporal dimension, no.

Basically a timeline that is independent of other timelines or temporal dimension is not affected by this and basically both can cover the same linear axis, we have already mentioned this in the "temporal dimensions revision" I made... In short, this is not appropriate.


But anyway, just go ahead. I'm not going to discuss this further here, I'm just thinking of opening a comprehensive thread with quotes and pages, because both the uncountable infinite timelines argument and the hypertimeline arguments are wrong.(Btw, uncountable infinite timeline actually means hypertimeline because only higher dimensional temporal dimensions can hold uncountable infinite number of timelines, so I'm not sure why you make a structure that already has this with 5-D, What you use for 6-D is basically already in 5-D, but anyway...)

And yes, basically what I'm going to do is to call the tier 1 experts directly in the thread i will made, don't get me wrong, I don't want to have a constant discussion and loop, I just want it to be concluded as quickly as possible

If you have concerns with this thread, voice them now so it can be settled. Why wait and make a separate thread when this one is still open? The only thing that got published so far was the Space Beyond revision.

 

[Georredannea15]

If you have concerns with this thread, voice them now so it can be settled. Why wait and make a separate thread when this one is still open? The only thing that got published so far was the Space Beyond revision.

My arguments will be very long and detailed, and I plan to deal with them separately because the same mistakes are being made about hypertimeline again.(even though we revised)

As I said, I need to explain them in detail and with quotes, the best way to do this is to open a different thread later. So, just cook right now.