• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Barney & Friends: The Statistics CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah but.

If the sun were to move the entire Solar System would be ****** up.

It's more logical to assume that the earth was rotating (if it's somehow just notcweak time manip)
 
If it was time manip, the children would be worried about what their parents would think of them being missing for some days, which they didn´t.

What´s classified as this if this isn´t time manip?
 
GiverOfThePeace said:
Uh.... can I get elaboration on that explanation?
Barney nor the kids were affected by it, if it was time manip, the children would be worried about what their parents would think of them being missing for some days, which they didn´t.
 
Seems like it's simply just day and night manipulation (we don't even have that power here) or some application of reality warping.
 
Shitty writing = the writers not thinking of the implications. You know, like alot of shows do.
 
I don´t think it qualifies for it, as there is nothing that supports it, while there are actual statements to make it seem more like just planetary movement as a low-end.
 
Bobsican said:
GiverOfThePeace said:
Uh.... can I get elaboration on that explanation?
Barney nor the kids were affected by it, if it was time manip, the children would be worried about what their parents would think of them being missing for some days, which they didn´t.
That further supports time manipulation rather then planetary movement actually. Also I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't affected by it since the time manip specifically affects whether it's day or night. You're taking a children's show at face value. It be the same logic as me saying "Oh well Lapis didn't steal the earth's ocean because the government would have stepped in if they did."
 
Can you please give a better example? As I´m not that familiar with SU.

Because otherwise this seems to be treated as some weird sort fo toon force.
 
Bobsican said:
Can you please give a better example? As I´m not that familiar with SU.
The point of the example was that some outside source not reacting to a situation would not suddenly make it not that, especially in a kids show.
 
Barney made the jars he used to make the feat early on the episode.

It seems there are now just two things left:

- Calc the "8-B" earthquake´s real AP

- Calc the weather manip

I feel a bit shy, but I guess I´ll have to just request it in that one thread.
 
I don't think he should 6-C with weather manipulation, he should 6-C normally, preferably after the storm calc, since he created the bottle casually.
 
You mean that it would also scale to durability and other physical stats? Which I don´t think so, as it would be like scaling the magic of a glass cannon to the wielder.

If so, the earthquake calc should be removed from the request.
 
Substantiation as to why he is 6-C in the first place would be cohesive to the all around rating, the tiering is too vague, elaborate as to why exactly weather manipulation would be 6-C.
 
Edwardtruong2006 said:
6-C enviro Destruction
He casually reality warped the bottle that cause the weather's change. It is not envir destruction
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top