CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,751
- 3,479
Haha, got you with the title didn't I? Just kidding It's a double whammy here's why Bill isn't Low 2-C:
I may have gotten you a third time I dunno.
Getting back on track now this isn't so much a downgrade as changing what Bill's rating says. He's currently rated as "At least Low 2-C" but all the justifications are based on statements, not actual feats. If anything, this seems to imply either a "Possibly" or even a "Likely" rating not an At least. It seems to fit with our definitions of what a Likely/Possibly rating is:
"Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should be favourable/intermediate."
So yeah, this was mostly just a thought I had while looking at his page.
I may have gotten you a third time I dunno.
Getting back on track now this isn't so much a downgrade as changing what Bill's rating says. He's currently rated as "At least Low 2-C" but all the justifications are based on statements, not actual feats. If anything, this seems to imply either a "Possibly" or even a "Likely" rating not an At least. It seems to fit with our definitions of what a Likely/Possibly rating is:
"Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should be favourable/intermediate."
So yeah, this was mostly just a thought I had while looking at his page.