Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you for helping out.done
I think that LordTracer handled it.
Somebody else handled it earlier. I wrote an instruction message at the end though.
Someone please close this. It's a joke thread made about me that has only served to annoy me and make my day worse, and most people agree it should be closed anyway.
Somebody else handled this earlier as well.
Apparently this is considered a stomp thread judging by a few comments regarding whatever the match is valid or not.
So it should been closed.
Can a moderator please ban me? Preferably, I wish for the ban to last for a week. I intend to take a break from this site to focus on my health, both physically and mentally, and I do not believe I have enough impulse control to stay away for the intended time.
I have been messaged that he made the requests in haste and wished to retract it.I need a ban for 9 months due to study reasons.
Thank you.Very well, I have lifted the ban.
Now, for some brass tacks of my own, I would like to request a small change to our Attack Potency page. Specifically with the notes regarding the uses of "High" and "Low" in the tiers.
High
Currently used to denote high end of a particular tier, it will here-on no longer be utilized in that manner. "High" will be utilized only if the instance matches with the revised Attack Potency chart.
Example: If a character is in the upper range of a tier such as Solar System level, said character will be listed as "Solar System level+", not "High Solar System level".
Low
Currently used to denote low end of a particular tier, it will here-on no longer be utilized in that manner. "Low" will be utilized only if the instance matches with the revised Attack Potency chart.
Example: There should be no usage of "Low 7-A", because it does not correspond with the revised Attack Potency chart.
To be brief, the usage of both to depict the high and low end of a tier has been defunct for a long time now, since most people have already moved on to using "+" or the lack thereof. I think it's redundant, and should be removed now.
It does not have a verse, no. However, a profile does not necessarily need to have a verse page to exist, and I trust that @Arceus0x adhered to creating a profile with an acceptable level of quality here.I am unsure, but this character does not have a verse tho
Coral (Coral of the void)
Coral of the void is the 38th holder of the void and the current leader of the void core. She lives with her human owner Cody and spends her time lazing around, causing chaos and defending her owner and the earth from monsters and eldritch abominations, such as the great old ones or even SCPs...vsbattles.fandom.com
I searched but did not find any
I trust him too, I just did not know that a characterIt does not have a verse, no. However, a profile does not necessarily need to have a verse page to exist, and I trust that @Arceus0x adhered to creating a profile with an acceptable level of quality here.
This seems reasonable to me as well. Thank you for keeping an eye out.Now, for some brass tacks of my own, I would like to request a small change to our Attack Potency page. Specifically with the notes regarding the uses of "High" and "Low" in the tiers.
High
Currently used to denote high end of a particular tier, it will here-on no longer be utilized in that manner. "High" will be utilized only if the instance matches with the revised Attack Potency chart.
Example: If a character is in the upper range of a tier such as Solar System level, said character will be listed as "Solar System level+", not "High Solar System level".
Low
Currently used to denote low end of a particular tier, it will here-on no longer be utilized in that manner. "Low" will be utilized only if the instance matches with the revised Attack Potency chart.
Example: There should be no usage of "Low 7-A", because it does not correspond with the revised Attack Potency chart.
To be brief, the usage of both to depict the high and low end of a tier has been defunct for a long time now, since most people have already moved on to using "+" or the lack thereof. I think it's redundant, and should be removed now.
Well, your mental health seems to have improved considerably over the years at least, but I would recommend that you begin to listen to relaxing Solfeggio meditation music via Spotify, that you exercise regularly, and that you walk in beautiful (safe) nature environments to help you improve further, if possible.Okay, I find myself questioning my own mental health as I recall a few things.
As such, I like to request a 2 weeks ban.
Also if I don’t forget, I do need to get a mental evaluation test at some point since my mind isn’t in a healthy state per se.
Thank you!I handled it.
Hmm, okay.Well, your mental health seems to have improved considerably over the years at least, but I would recommend that you being to listen to relaxing Solfeggio meditation music via Spotify, that you exercise regularly, and that you walk in beautiful (safe) nature environments to help you improve further, if possible.
Bump. It seems that the close request is forgotten.Request for closing https://vsbattles.com/threads/chisato-nishikigi-vs-john-wick.142407/ because an ongoing CRT would result in the match being a stomp.
I removed the sections from the page.This seems reasonable to me as well. Thank you for keeping an eye out.
Please close this match, is a stomp between an android policeman with a gun and a literal kid who only real fighting experience is punching once another kid who pissed her after talk a lot of shit.
I have closed both of these threads, and I will look over the other one in just a minute here.Bump. It seems that the close request is forgotten.
Closed.Requesting that this thread is closed. Stayed alive far longer than it needed to.
Thank you!Closed.
Can someone close this thread the OP kept using the abilities on an ongoing CRT that isn't on the profile yet and not even accepted yet. Just reopen it if the CRT is finished.
It appears to me that both sides of this argument are both in the right and in the wrong.And would like to recommend a thread moderator to look at the conversation, he seems not to understand our part and does not care at all.