• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

Bernkastelll said:
What about just asking to me change the ******* thread to remove the political bullshit instead of asking to be closed?
Click to expand...
First off, chill out. Second off, you can just recreate the thread. It’s not a big deal. Several of the replies had already mentioned the political figure in question. Editing the thread would’ve done little at that point.
 
That may just be a mod jumping the gun but we'll wait, though I guess it was too hard to just move it to Fun and Games if they were really insistent on it not being in Versus Threads
 
Crimson_Shadow101 said:
I don’t take responsibility for the closure of that second thread. And yes I will tell you to calm down. It was an option I forgot about and I apologize for. There’s still no reason to be getting as aggressive as you are right now.
Click to expand...
Yes you do because it's your fault to ask to the first thread be closed and someone who abuses the mod power literally closed the second shit without even reading and who tf do u think that u are to know if I am not calm or agressive and try to force me to do something?
 
Let's also consider the fact that the Site Rules doesn't explicitly forbid anything related to the use of political figures (while I think it is an ultimately productive rule to add, it doesn't exist yet) and only contains a related rule that does not tolerate "Derogatory comments on religious or political matters (both highly sensitive issues)". Do mods have some discretion to enforce what isn't in the rules?
 
Bern, I am giving you an official warning now. Chill out!

If mistakes were made, they were made. And if you are upset, fine.

However, that thread never belonged in the Versus Threads forum. Threads like that belong in F&G, period. (Not to mention the stuff about political members, which is explicitly not allowed.) If you had asked politely to have your thread restored and moved to F&G, there would have been no issues. But your attitude is shining you in a poor light, and you need to cut it out.
 
Bernkastelll said:
Yes you do because it's your fault to ask to the first thread be closed and someone who abuses the mod power literally closed the second shit without even reading and who tf do u think that u are to know if I am not calm or agressive and try to force me to do something?
Click to expand...
How exactly is a mod closing the second thread my fault? I asked them to close a match involving a political figure. I didn’t ask to close every thread involving Goku vs Composite real world. And I don’t need to be a mind reader to understand what is and what isn’t an aggressive tone of text.
 
Starter_Pack said:
(Not to mention the stuff about political members, which is explicitly not allowed.) If you had asked politely to have your thread restored and moved to F&G, there would have been no issues.
Click to expand...
Yeah because asking to remove political stuff is Super Hard right?
 
Can someone add this category to these locked profiles?

vsbattles.fandom.com

Monkey D. Luffy (Pre-Timeskip)

Monkey D. Luffy (モンキー・Ｄディー・ルフィ, Monkī Dī Rufi?), known as "Straw Hat Luffy", is the main protagonist of the manga and anime, One Piece. He's the son of Monkey D. Dragon, a revolutionary considered “The World's Most Dangerous Criminal”; the grandson of Monkey D. Garp, a powerful Marine...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Monkey D. Luffy (Post-Timeskip)

Monkey D. Luffy, known as "Straw Hat Luffy", is the main protagonist of the manga and anime, One Piece. He's the son of Monkey D. Dragon, a revolutionary considered “The World's Most Dangerous Criminal”; the grandson of Monkey D. Garp, a powerful Marine Vice-Admiral who had cornered the late...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com

Usopp

Usopp serves as the crew's sharpshooter and previously served as the (barely competent) repairman for the ship. He's the son of Yasopp, a sharpshooter serving under Shanks, and comes from the East Blue. Usopp had a reputation on his home island of being a serial liar who claimed that pirates...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

Since these are the only locked OP char profiles for people who have Haki

Edit: Also I have this issue

Screen_Shot_2021-09-13_at_12.53.02_PM.png


The name of the category won't come up.

I was informed that it would take some time, but it's been almost an hour and I've added 80+ profiles. I'd assume it would've registered by now
 
No problem.
 
I have asked within the thread.
 
I have done so.
 
I handled it.
 
Sorry for the double post, but as I'm sure this is minor enought ironically...

This profile was made with a key section.

The problem? It has only a single key, and in fact that fits the formatting given there's only a single tier section for the purposes of this page, the issue is that this detail goes against the Standard Format for Character Profiles, respectively:

"For characters who have transformation stages/power-ups or who become stronger through certain points of the story, insert those transformations/power-ups/timelines here in bold."

Given the plural around here, it's clear that the Key section isn't meant for pages that would only have a single section, and it's understandable why, it's redundant and useless, yet some users like @Dragonmasterxyz argue off-site that it's not a big deal to break a standard just because it makes the job easier for a future CRT, except that as he said, this area is so minor for a revision it could also be removed without issue, not more than 10 seconds are realistically saved in editing with this., and in fact can give issues when editing.

Therefore, perhaps the Standard Format of Characters Profiles should also say that the Key section shouldn't be added to characters that would only have a single one in the first place?
 
Last edited:
I don't mind whatever conclusion is given so long we specify in the end if giving a key section to a page with a single key in the first place is fine.
And even then this would grant a site-wide revision if we say "yes" to this, for the sake of consistency and all.
 
Bob, use common sense. If there is nothing saying it's an issue or against standards, then it is causing no issues meaning whether you like it or not, it is not against the rules. You are the only one making a small and insignificant thing public and making it a bigger deal than it actually is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
70
Views
8K
DarkDragonMedeus
DarkDragonMedeus
AKM sama
Super Moderator Promotions and New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
Greenshifter
Greenshifter
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
69
Views
11K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
LegendariumOfLies
  • Sticky
Abandoned OR Outdated Verses Help Thread
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
MasqueTLDF
MasqueTLDF
Back
Top