- 20,606
- 17,606
No, for the same reason 5 2A spaces isn't Low 1-C.An Infinite or 5 God STR would be uncountably stronger than a 5 Hunter STR?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, for the same reason 5 2A spaces isn't Low 1-C.An Infinite or 5 God STR would be uncountably stronger than a 5 Hunter STR?
Got.No, for the same reason 5 2A spaces isn't Low 1-C.
These would both be Aleph-0Where an Infinite Hunter STR = 1 God STR = Aleph-0
Infinite God STR = 1 SuperGod STR = Aleph-1
This is probably Aleph-1Infinite SuperGod STR = Aleph-2
The recent posts were in regarding how to portray a character B being uncountable stronger than character a via a narrative description.Where is this thread?
Bump.The recent posts were in regarding how to portray a character B being uncountable stronger than character a via a narrative description.
Using a game-like world seemed to be the closest analog due to a universal number system in place.
I'm pretty sure just blatantly saying that B is uncountable stronger than A needs more context.
Bump.The recent posts were in regarding how to portray a character B being uncountable stronger than character a via a narrative description.
Using a game-like world seemed to be the closest analog due to a universal number system in place.
I'm pretty sure just blatantly saying that B is uncountable stronger than A needs more context.
@Ultima_Reality @DontTalkDT @Qawsedf234The recent posts were in regarding how to portray a character B being uncountable stronger than character a via a narrative description.
Using a game-like world seemed to be the closest analog due to a universal number system in place.
I'm pretty sure just blatantly saying that B is uncountable stronger than A needs more context.
Idk.What do you think should be done here currently
There's no visual feat that would grant you an Aleph-1 number of universes. It would require statements to get to that point.Going back to the OP, it seems impossible to portray a character as uncountbly stronger without literally saying "uncountably" stronger or something
So what should we do?There's no visual feat that would grant you an Aleph-1 number of universes. It would require statements to get to that point.
And the same can be said about portraying a character as uncountably stronger than someone else without scaling to some structure, yes?There's no visual feat that would grant you an Aleph-1 number of universes. It would require statements to get to that point.
Without statements I don't see a clean way to portray an Aleph-1 difference without doing a "Flat object in comparison" sort of thing.And the same can be said about portraying a character as uncountably stronger than someone else without scaling to some structure, yes?
Aren't all of these all just aleph0?Ah, okay. So only the below would be the correct Alephs?
A Single Number = A Single Separate Spactio-Temporal Layer
Aleph-0 = An infinite number set of Spactio-Separate Temporal Layers which fit inside a Single Timeline
Aleph-1 = An infinite number set of Timelines in which an infinite number set of Separate Temporal Layers fits inside each
"Without statements I don't see a clean way to portray an Aleph-1 difference without doing a "Flat object in comparison" sort of thing."What are the staff conclusions here so far?
A countable infinity can be visualised and listed because it is a set of total ordering. The set of all natural numbers, integers and rational numbers can all be listed in a definite order, hence the cardinality of all of those numbers is aleph-0, therefore countable. However, the same thing cannot be said for the set/series of all real numbers between 0 and 1; there are unending infinite and forever expanding permutations of decimal values between 0 and 1, therefore cannot be visually ordered by any case because it simply contains far too many numbers to be listed out, making it impossible to be ordered and counted. If you were to attempt to count all real numbers between 0 and 1, no matter how many eternities you dedicate, there'll forever be unending and continuous decimal values for you left to count, meaning you'll never truly count out all real numbers between 0 and 1 no matter not, because it is simply impossible. To summarise, there is an uncountably infinite quantity of numbers between 0 and 1; visually showing all of those numbers is utterly impossible. A simple explanation can be seen in this video.
With this inferred, a Low 1-C feat cannot be entirely depicted or shown without direct statements in support of it. For instance, if an infinite multiverse of any size were destroyed, it would be classified as 2-A. However, if there are statements indicating that the infinite multiverse's cosmological structure is uncountably infinite, it can be considered Low 1-C.
A practical example: Structure A contains infinite space-time continuums (2-A). Structure B contains an uncountably infinite space-time continuums (Low 1-C). If Character A can destroy an infinite series/set of Structure A, infinite times, and even for an infinite time, he'll still be 2-A and unable to destroy Structure B, because Structure B is never-ending and simply too big to be considerably destroyed, meaning destroying it will be impossible. For Character A to be able to destroy Structure B, God will have to make a statement that he has indeed destroyed an unending infinite series/set of Structure As, for his feat to be equivalent to destroying Structure B.