• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Temporal axises and HDE manipulation

Messages
6,256
Reaction score
4,038
Alright so I noticed this in Tiering System FAQ:

We require that the additional time dimension is "a line comprised of uncountably infinitely many points." If new versions of timelines are only created if they are changed, due to time travel for example, then the number of "snapshots" of the timeline would be far more limited. The amount of snapshots would be one more than the times the timeline was changed. So, for example, if the timeline is rewritten 2 times, there would be 3 snapshots of the timeline: the original, the timeline after the first rewrite and the timeline after the second rewrite. That are far less than the required uncountably infinitely many.

However, in such scenario, this would mean that there is still 5th axis (temporal), but just on a very, very small scale, meaning a character can be given Higher-Dimensional Manipulation since it isn’t an AP feat if he can destroy such timelines?
 
Destroying a 5-D timeline does not give HDE Manipulation. It's just destruction not Dimensional Manipulation.
 
I’m pretty sure Alien X was given HDE Manipulation due to destroying higher dimensional structure
Nah I don't think so. You can only see Low 1-C characters on the way up. They don't have Higher Dimensional Manipulation. Dimensional Manipulation is done through axis manipulation.Read the last paragraph on this page:

 
Nah I don't think so. You can only see Low 1-C characters on the way up. They don't have Higher Dimensional Manipulation. Dimensional Manipulation is done through axis manipulation.Read the last paragraph on this page:
I was referring to this:
Characters that can just move or otherwise physically handle higher- or lower-dimensional objects can receive "Limited Dimensional Manipulation".
 
From what i remember the Multiverse is 26D and he rebuilt Ben 10's omniverse
Could be taken as a Reality Warping (26D). What I see that gives him a Limited Higher Dimension Manipulation is that he has broken through a dimensional barrier. It all depends on how the barrier works to give him that but what is interesting is the second to last paragraph on the Dimensional Manipulation page.
 
Could be taken as a Reality Warping (26D). What I see that gives him a Limited Higher Dimension Manipulation is that he has broken through a dimensional barrier. It all depends on how the barrier works to give him that but what is interesting is the second to last paragraph on the Dimensional Manipulation page.
I really don't know how he got HDE or immortality type 9, if I'm wrong someone should fix it
 
However, in such scenario, this would mean that there is still 5th axis (temporal), but just on a very, very small scale, meaning a character can be given Higher-Dimensional Manipulation since it isn’t an AP feat if he can destroy such timelines?
No, it's nearly impossible for there to be such a thing as an insignificantly large temporal dimension. The segment of the FAQ you're citing is an instance of an anti-feat that would prove an overarching timeline is just an overarching timeline and not an extra temporal dimension.
 
From what i remember the Multiverse is 26D and he rebuilt Ben 10's omniverse
I was talking about his Limited Higher-Dimensional Manipulation
That's the difference. Destroying a 5-D universe does not mean the character moved it or can physically handle it.
Shouldn’t creating or destroying one suffice?
No, it's nearly impossible for there to be such a thing as an insignificantly large temporal dimension. The segment of the FAQ you're citing is an instance of an anti-feat that would prove an overarching timeline is just an overarching timeline and not an extra temporal dimension.
Yes, but basically uncountably infinite amount of snapshots is another temporal axis of significant size, however non-uncountably infinite amount of snapshots should logically mean the temporal axis of far less size for AP, but still 5D.
 
It's not 5-D, but only 4-D. Adding a new temporal dimension is effectively the same as adding a new spatial dimension to a given space. Meant that you are now adding an uncountable infinite number of line segments to a given 4-D structure.
 
It's not 5-D, but only 4-D. Adding a new temporal dimension is effectively the same as adding a new spatial dimension to a given space. Meant that you are now adding an uncountable infinite number of line segments to a given 4-D structure.
If you have 5th dimension (temporal in this case), you are 5D, just not big enough to be relevant to Tiering, no?
 
Wasn't the purpose of this thread to ask if destroying a 5-D timeline gives HDM?
Yeah, I was just confused that you said “destroying a dimension ≠ HDM”. Like, I agree it’s not true for regular dimensions (where dimension = universe), but I was talking about a very specific one… or maybe I misunderstood what you meant.
 
Yeah, I was just confused that you said “destroying a dimension ≠ HDM”. Like, I agree it’s not true for regular dimensions (where dimension = universe), but I was talking about a very specific one… or maybe I misunderstood what you meant.
No matter how it is, destroying a dimension does not give Limited Dimensional Manipulation except in extremely special cases.
Ah in this comment I was talking about the realms/universes.
 
Back
Top