- 18,393
- 14,323
Gasper; it should be implied that he is unchangeable. An “explicit statement” is not needed. It should be understood given by context. Context is key. Sure, we should not imply beyond its context, but someone is becoming the new ruler – void body (described as formless and nonphysical) within the emptiness of the Empty universe, described as beyond causality and time, the laws of world has no place there.Does he have any statements for being changless or unchangeable?
In the last arc, he is the new The Law of Identity with void body beyond causality and time in that universe – everything that remained was emptiness within emptiness. That emptiness did not even contain words.
If it was only described as void, sure. You would get a point, but it was described as beyond causality and time.