- 17,960
- 28,056
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
4-B MCU OWO???
- Thread starter Emirp sumitpo
- Start date
- Status
- 32,868
- 38,156
The Sokovia feat is 1.94076750036374740958170092367e18 J or 463.854565 megatons of TNT (Mountain level), 10x that is easily baseline 6-C.
The ice-breaking feat is 493.89347514340346379 megatons of TNT for fragging Ice, and 493.63766730401528093 megatons of TNT if you went with the 1 m displacement end for the earthquake on the 100x Grand Canyon area. (Shockingly the Method 2.5 Low-end and the ice-fragging end of Grand Canyon x100 are shockingly almost borderline equal).
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,154
- 4,564
Yeah so he'd be 4.93 Gigatons which is scarily consistent with Thanos 5 Gigaton feat. It's a gap but it's not as drastic as implied by the previous ratings
- 32,868
- 38,156
That being said, some people could have issues with the Bifrost thingy and bring up durability inconsistencies and whatnot so...
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #206
So what's the conclusion on the whole 6-C thing? I wasn't reading. I concede to the Strange thing.
If most people disagree with the Iron Man separation. Then I'll bring back the composite draft later. I'll probably post the composite draft in another thread as that'll take a while
If most people disagree with the Iron Man separation. Then I'll bring back the composite draft later. I'll probably post the composite draft in another thread as that'll take a while
- 17,960
- 28,056
6-C and 7-A upgrades accepted
- 32,868
- 38,156
That and Hellbeast found some more arguments for 6-C Cap and Thor.
- 17,960
- 28,056
Yep and these should considered moving forward Imo it really helps solidify the scaling on an extra layer and keeps the 6-C consistent
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #210
What are the 6-C arguments?
- 17,960
- 28,056
They're literally like the ones directly a couple of messages above
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #212
Also considering Hulk scaling to Thanos is invalid and doesn't count for AP? Does hulk really need his post sakaar key anymore. Like I don't think there's a stated strength increase. And Hulk should just be 7-A.
Also I don't think Professor Hulk really needs a key.
Also I don't think Professor Hulk really needs a key.
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #213
Shouldn't that be in a blog?
- 17,960
- 28,056
Eh these are from already accepted calc's but probably the 10x thing yeah
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,154
- 4,564
That's true but idk it feels fairly clear cut imo
I'm proposing we drop the "at most" and just make them flatout 6-C, they fight Thanos well enough and the upscaling would just make them a bit under Thanos' 5 Gigaton tank
I'm torn but I think I lean more in favour of your idea if it simplifies the page
Agreed, he hasn't grown stronger by feats
It's on the page, just bringing up that the implication makes them 6-C with your 7-A upgrades
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #216
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,154
- 4,564
Yeah the 10X thing is already in his Ragnarok/IW key
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #218
Ah ok then.
Dang Hulk boutta get his ass whooped down to fodder 7-A only
Dang Hulk boutta get his ass whooped down to fodder 7-A only
- 17,960
- 28,056
War machine stomps lol
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #221
Hulk buster 2.0 gonna one shot him so bad that it's not even funny
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #222
Also should we note that Hulk being stated to be as strong as Thanos is an Outlier in the notes section, as it creates scaling contradictions. In case someone brings it up as an upgrade attempt
Last edited:
Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,154
- 4,564
Could be good.
EDIT: So 7-A Phase 1 and 2 with 6-C for Phase 3
Last edited:
- 4,176
- 2,918
Not an outlier and death of author but yeah
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #225
- 4,176
- 2,918
Meant the statament taht hulk = thanos is death of author
Outlier applies to inconsistent feats
Death of author is when author stataments are wrong
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #227
Ah ok
- 8,997
- 9,718
I found this a while ago, but would Thor sacrificing his life force make him weaker? I know it's a deleted scene, but it was also kinda stated in the movie
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #229
The article is about deleted scenes...
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #231
We don't really have proof he was weakened.
- 8,997
- 9,718
Alright. I was just confirming because it sounded like that
- 25,249
- 27,680
- Thread starter
- #234
Waiting for approval.
- 39,725
- 15,645
I think we had enough staffs to approved the revisions
- 17,960
- 28,056
- 17,960
- 28,056
This is basically it Ant the overall scaling stays the same but basically this method of the scaling proposed would be keeping it more consistent
Edit: also seemingly the Doctor Strange 6-C scaling stuff has been rejected. Other than that the same agreements and conclusions have been met though I think it's best to handle whether Iron Man's armor should have seperate pages in another CRT so we can apply what's been accepted since that specific thing still seems to have some back and forth. That's ofc unless we simply apply what's been accepted and continue to discuss the Iron Man thing here and reach a conclusion
Last edited:
- 2,336
- 1,443
The Sokovia feat was previously dismissed due to being a vibranium-based chain reaction that amplifies the energy. Tony heats the vibranium from the below, and gives Thor the signal to strike from above so that the energy keeps doubling back.
According to F.R.I.D.A.Y., Thor can only crack Sokovia if he spreads his energy through the vibranium running underneath the city. With fragmentation that is something like Low 7-B, and with violent fragmentation that is 7-B.
In Jotunheim, did Thor bust part of the canyon, or the entire canyon?
According to F.R.I.D.A.Y., Thor can only crack Sokovia if he spreads his energy through the vibranium running underneath the city. With fragmentation that is something like Low 7-B, and with violent fragmentation that is 7-B.
| FRIDAY: The Vibranium core has got a magnetic field, that's what's keeping the rock together. Tony Stark: If it drops? FRIDAY: Right now the impact would kill thousands. Once it gets high enough: Global extinction. [...] FRIDAY: The anti-gravs are rigged to flip. Touch 'em, they'll go full reverse thrust. The city's not coming down slow. Tony Stark: The spire's Vibranium. If I get Thor to hit it... FRIDAY: It'll crack, but that's not enough, the impact would still be devastating. Tony Stark: Maybe if we cap the other end, keep the atomic action doubling back. FRIDAY: That could vaporize the city, and everyone on it. Steve Rogers: The next wave's gonna hit any minute. What have you got, Stark? Tony Stark: Well, nothing great. Maybe a way to blow up the city. That'll keep it from impacting the surface if you guys can get clear. Steve Rogers: I asked for a solution, not an escape plan. Tony Stark: Impact radius is getting bigger every second. We're going to have to make a choice. Natasha Romanoff: Cap, these people are going nowhere. If Stark finds a way to blow this rock... [...] Tony Stark: Thor, on my mark. Now! |
In Jotunheim, did Thor bust part of the canyon, or the entire canyon?
- Status
Similar threads
