Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your mistake was trying to make a conversation out of it.Sera EX said:I already went there King, and it wasn't going so well.
If infinity actually multiplies like normal numbers then it isn't, if it doesn't and multiplying infinity by two doesn't give a greater number then it is a problemMrKingOfNegativity said:No, they wouldn't.
An "at least 2-A" who destroyed two multiverses would be treated as weaker than an "at least 2-A" who destroyed three or more, and so-on.
I don't see why that's such an unfathomable concept.
You can't ignore feats. If a feat is above baseline 2-A, it's above baseline 2-A. Collapsing a multiverse with a thought is superior to collapsing a multiverse using all of your power.Agnaa said:That still doesn't resolve the fundamental issue of people thinking that there can't be an above baseline 2-A feat (paraphrasing, I know Andy's position is more nuanced than this).
We never ranked those as higher than 2-A though. Do some people treat them as above baseline? Yeah but that's a debate rhetoric and not a flaw in our tiering. It doesn't need to be made into a thread since people are allowed to have those interpretations in a vs thread.Andytrenom said:I don't even disagree with Pritti's explanation. My problem is solely with "multiple multiverses" being used to justify above baseline status by default. Even then it's more with particular arguments, I'm willing to admit if I have misconception regarding the actual rules I'm talking about
The threads linked in the OP.EmperorRorepme said:Oh well you have a case there. But are there even any examples?
No-one was arguing that they were High 2-A. They were arguing that they were above baseline, and that's what this thread's about.Sera EX said:So you're saying this is all Cal's fault?
I agree with you Andy, truly 2x2 infinite multiverse is still just 2-A. Whether nor not people should treat it as above baseline 2-A is up for them to decide but they aren't High 2-A. Maybe "At least 2-A" or "2-A possibly higher", but no more.
Andytrenom said:@King And I apologize if this makes you unhappy but I see no reason why someone should just take it as a fact when you say "fiction recurrently throws this out of the window". As far as I can see that's a statement you made without any backing and that isn't proof of anything