Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mind elaborating ?Sera EX said:The gap between Low 2-C and 2-C is very much calculable. I've learned we can pretty much calc anything. You just need to know the method.
I have very sure that's not the case and our current system fuction like most of fiction threats stuffSera EX said:We chose methods not demonstrated or consistently shown across fiction already. That's having standards in general.
Well beyond not being demonstrated or consistently shown across fiction, calculating Low 2-C to 2-C has absolutely no basis in reality. Calcs at least have that going for them. Any result for Low 2-C to 2-C is essentially pulled out of our ass by picking arbitrarily between a dozen different reasonable assumptions for it.Sera EX said:We chose methods not demonstrated or consistently shown across fiction already. That's having standards in general. I obviously agree with yoi there, but no one wants a feat-based system, the only way yoi don't have to rely on unfair methods. That's another discussion though.
If a fictional work actually goes against maths by specifying that two infinite multiverses are greater than one, there's no problem treating it that way. My only issue is taking this as the default standardAgnaa said:Yes but by taking that to its logical extreme, there can be no "stronger than baseline 2-A" without reaching to High 2-A. Specifically because (assuming ZFC) there's no set with a size between countably infinite and uncountably infinite.
I think we often have to make choices between what physics says, what pure maths says, and what fiction says. And I think in this case, enough fiction has characters that are stronger than infinite characters that we should account for that.
I hope this is a joke. Infinity doesn't work with algebra.Overlord775 said:@Andy
2 * Infinity / Infinity = 2 tho
It's not against actual math though?Andytrenom said:But seeming more logical doesn't prove something is correct, this still goes against that infinity times 2 is still infinity and the same level of infinity, so unless I'm missing something taking destroying two multiverses to be above baseline as a standard is assuming that fiction will go against actual mathematics unless proven otherwise
I can't go into detail without doing more research, I just know that "infinity" isn't part of the numbers/operations that standard algebra is consistent with. I think this video briefly mentions it, but there's a whole chain of research I'd need to go down.Overlord775 said:@Agnaa
Wh exactly doen't it work ?
>_>