- 177,276
- 90,163
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My conclusion is there should probably be more evidence to come to the conclusion of 1-A.
Since my stance was disagreeing. I will support Udl.My conclusion is there should probably be more evidence to come to the conclusion of 1-A.
Even the one with Plato's cave analogy is still speculative on what the light projecting the shadows are, with the strongest argument there being someone's Stigmata believing its them (the Stigmatas).
It seems wayyyyy too speculative for any foundation in 1-A.
How that's speculative?? Also what is this?Even the one with Plato's cave analogy is still speculative on what the light projecting the shadows are, with the strongest argument there being someone's Stigmata believing its them (the Stigmatas).
I would like know how all of my arguments are speculative if possiblethe strongest argument there being someone's Stigmata believing its them (the Stigmatas).
Your evidence for him saying humanity is the shadow is someone literally speculating that Humanity is the Shadow.How that's speculative?? Also what is this?
The one who is speculating is a form born out of stigma. It's safe to say it's reliable. I also gave other evidences to prove why stigma are true things while humanity is shadow. Spiritual Adam, Imaginary and spirit being true essence. If you only take one scans and argue against proposal, it would bound to fall off since it's just one instant.Your evidence for him saying humanity is the shadow is someone literally speculating that Humanity is the Shadow.
Something which is rejected by Kevin later on.
Someone saying "I fear that" is them saying they're worrying it might be the case.
This is something that's self-evident.
But you misunderstand. The issue isn't reliability, the issue is the entity themselves is speculating.The one who is speculating is a form born out of stigma. It's safe to say it's reliable. I also gave other evidences to prove why stigma are true things while humanity is shadow. Spiritual Adam, Imaginary and spirit being true essence. If you only take one scans and argue against proposal, it would bound to fall off since it's just one instant.
Before I do, have we moved on from the speculatory part?Can you quote the part where someone outright rejected that idea?
I don't deny the entity is speculating but it's further reinforce by lore contexts. Just because one story instant speculated a fact that will be proven later or was proven already in some parts (unrelated to the entity), we can't dismiss all of that just because of this instant.Before I do, have we moved on from the speculatory part?
Right, but so far, that's the closest evidence presented, the rest, things like the Dream World girl and such aren't accurate.I don't deny the entity is speculating but it's further reinforce by lore contexts. Just because one story instant speculated a fact that will be proven later or was proven already in some parts (unrelated to the entity), we can't dismiss all of that just because of this instant.
The rest isn't just Star Dream's part. Star Dream part is still valid since VSB standard for R>F clearly stated the lower world doesn't necessarily need to be the higher entity's creation. The important thing is how Star Dream is superior to the dream world.Right, but so far, that's the closest evidence presented, the rest, things like the Dream World girl and such aren't accurate.
We already went over that and why it's not relevant, so I'm not going to repeat myself. Refer back to my previous points.The rest isn't just Star Dream's part. Star Dream part is still valid since VSB standard for R>F clearly stated the lower world doesn't necessarily need to be the higher entity's creation. The important thing is how Star Dream is superior to the dream world.
The most you've shown is that concepts build from humanity's consciousness reside in the Imaginary Space and that it's the origin of the Universe and its laws.The other evidences are also solidifying the fact that Imaginary is the idea, the abstract, the ultimate truth, the origin of laws and the true essence which birth the Cosmo.
No we haven't. You just assumed that universe is on the same level of existence as Star Dream while nowhere in the story indicated so. Imaginary space is clearly stated to defy reality constants. The rabbit universe is without a doubt a normal material universe considering they have galaxies and nebulae. Honkai verse has only two spaces, real space and imaginary space. Since Star Dream is in imaginary space while rabbit universe is clearly normal universe (real space), they are not on the same level of existence even before the dream world. Even though star dream didn't create the dream world, by vsb standard it should still qualify for R>F. We can let staffs to evaluate on thisWe already went over that and why it's not relevant, so I'm not going to repeat myself. Refer back to my previous points.
Imaginary is stated to be true essence of Cosmo and the being. That means material world isn't true essence. Spiritual Adam from project stigma see humans as dream indicating R>F more. With plato cave allegory, imaginary being more real than reality is further reinforced. I don't understand why these aren't accurate or qualify for 1-A. Like instead of saying it's not qualify, just say why.The most you've shown is that concepts build from humanity's consciousness reside in the Imaginary Space and that it's the origin of the Universe and its laws.
Any time.Thank you for helping out, Udlmaster.![]()
No. I didn't. I said that the Universe is being projected into her dream. Nothing in the text says the Universe that's being projected into her dream is itself a dream.You just assumed that universe is on the same level of existence as Star Dream while nowhere in the story indicated so.
I don't find this 1-A material either. Supporting evidence perhaps, but for the same reasons I don't think Cthulhu is 1-A because of Non-Euclidean geometry, I don't find anything "defying reality's constants" to be foundational evidence.Imaginary space is clearly stated to defy reality constants.
I thought you'd argue this.Since Star Dream is in imaginary space while rabbit universe is clearly normal universe (real space), they are not on the same level of existence even before the dream world.
Even reading the story for the dream girl, it's not the case that the Universe she maintains is sustained by any actual power but more so a consequence of Dreams forming reality.
This isn't a 1-A power situation, this is beings with the power to manipulate a type of Dreaming. Hardly any different than things like the Dreaming from Sandman.
It's further backed up by the Rabbit explaining that his civilisation projected their Universe into other dimensions and eventually hit her Dream and her Dream became their universe, meaning it's not her creation, it's just using the Dream.
If I may add some things.We already went over that and why it's not relevant, so I'm not going to repeat myself. Refer back to my previous points.
The most you've shown is that concepts build from humanity's consciousness reside in the Imaginary Space and that it's the origin of the Universe and its laws.
This isn't enough for 1-A.
Star dream is literally a godhead. Wdym she has no powerLikewise, Star Dream clearly has no extraordinary powers, it's just in her dream world.
It's as silly as arguing everyone from DC comics is 1-A because they have access to the Dreaming and have multiple universes within.
The Dream being inferior to Star Dream only confirms that the Dream is 11-A or lower, not that the little girl with no powers, no special nature and who literally needs sleep, is involved in reality, time and space, is 1-A.
You are making this confusing unnecessarily. The story is very simple. You got a rabbit universe which got projected into her dream. Since rabbit universe is material universe and star dream lives in imaginary space, star dream is ontologically superior to rabbit universe. What is it so hard to understand?And this directly counters your assertion, because if Star Dream is projecting her dream in to a higher reality, then it has nothing to do with her, the Universe being projected into her dream is contained within a Higher reality, like a Universe being within a Multiverse.
That doesn't make sense. So it indeed is hard to understand.You are making this confusing unnecessarily. The story is very simple. You got a rabbit universe which got projected into her dream. Since rabbit universe is material universe and star dream lives in imaginary space, star dream is ontologically superior to rabbit universe. What is it so hard to understand?
I'm slowly going to detach myself from this thread. You gotta wait for mods, I guess.Then, what about other metaphysical parts too? They on their own are also indicating 1-A
I don't need to, in this instance, as Udl (as usual) explains stuff better than I ever canSure but it would be better if you can inform me why and what exactly you disagree. If you don't want to bother doing so, it's also fine.
Anyone?What are the staff opinions here so far?![]()
Apotheosis69 disagreed too, so it'll be 2 disagreements.So just to make sure, Ant is sided with udl who disagrees here right? that would make 1 disagreement?
TL helpers dont count, only thread mods admins and aboveApotheosis69 disagreed too, so it'll be 2 disagreements.
Even if that’s the case, all staffs’ evaluation regardless of status have significant amount of influence neverthelessTL helpers dont count, only thread mods admins and above
I prefer the quality of the arguments rather than the titles of the members. Yeah, it’s good to have mods’ input but they rarely satisfy much unless they are knowledgeable in the specific regard(That’s why mod inputs take a while since most of them like to stay within the frame of what they know).Even if that’s the case, all staffs’ evaluation regardless of status have significant amount of influence nevertheless
Except me, because I read the posts and am always correct and cool and based and correct.I prefer the quality of the arguments rather than the titles of the members. Yeah, it’s good to have mods’ input but they rarely satisfy much unless they are knowledgeable in the specific regard(That’s why mod inputs take a while since most of them like to stay within the frame of what they know).