1-A Imaginary & Metaphysics

[Theglassman12]

Or they have read it and are not convinced. If you’re going to convince people to agree with you maybe don’t start accusing them of not reading in the first place. Makes it harder for anyone to take you seriously if this is the approach you have for any disagreements.

 

[Weaver261]

Or they have read it and are not convinced. If you’re going to convince people to agree with you maybe don’t start accusing them of not reading in the first place. Makes it harder for anyone to take you seriously if this is the approach you have for any disagreements.

So, it's fine for others to take dialogues out of whole context to prove their points but it's not good when I point that out? Honestly, it's kinda getting frustrating.

40. Argumentum ad nauseum, or argument from repetition.
This is when someone keeps making a claim over and over again, but either does not provide actual evidence, or provides evidence which is later debunked, but keeps making the claim. Eventually (or so he hopes), his opponent will get tired of arguing and he can declare victory.

Telomera has shown this kind of behavior before too. Oversimplifying story context, taking out single line from whole context to prove their points and ignoring other's explanation. But instead of making the debate more fruitful by giving objective and insight evaluations, you are supporting such behaviors? Yeah, I am loss at words.
Also, you can close the crt now since there're enough disagree votes. (I don't even want to argue anymore since it's pointless)

 

[Theglassman12]

Do not act like you have the moral high ground when you're acting very immature over the idea of people not seeing eye to eye with you. Either way this thread seems to be done so I'll be closing it.