This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I and Pein are not VSBW staff, you'll have to wait for someone with the banner under their username that says "Thread Moderator", "Administrator" or "Bureaucrat".
I recall there's going to be a site-wide change at some point on all pocket realities that have their own time axis just being straight up Low 2-C, but that's besides the points for the current standards, will check.
Yes, unreality is where Sora ended up, which so happens to be the place one could argue to be the afterlife as well, as that's where hearts that died move on, plus Strelitzia even calls it that in the KH4 trailer.
High-Godly type 8 immortality, passive fate manip that prevents permanent incap/death, type 1 conceptual manip EE, resistances to nearly every hax on the site.
Do keep in mind all of the above is currently baseline out of that pending a proper CRT, however.
Agree: @Starter_Pack, @SamanPatou (except for legendaries if the feats only happen in one piece of media), @Planck69
Disagree: @Everything12
It seems we probably should polish things with Everything12 and SamanPatou first from what I'm looking.
The only canon thing from the leaks besides some character personality traits is the confirmation of the Horizons anime taking place in the same world as Ash's.
Would it be ideal to make it so that all words that are automatically censored in the forum, instead of just turning into a string of " *** ", they became more specific to the severity? Say, slurs saying "(REPORT ME TO A MOD)", and other words that wouldn't net at least a warning to something...
May as well post what I had, it may overlap a bit with the above, but it still seems pertinent to post.
Sorry for the delay, this came right as about most are entering back school.
This point was never presented on its own in the first place (for those not into the verse, the 2-A claims over...
TBH given that combat stuff isn't going to be usable for intelligence ratings in the future (from the looks of that one CRT), instead merely listing the feats and so on, I feel this is a waste of effort nowadays.
Type 5 Acausality is limited to specific things similarly to the current way type 4 Acausality is, with the main difference between the two is that one involves the character simply working on a different causality system, thus leading to potentially different results or origins when interacting...
The best way to put it is that as species pages, Pokemon profiles are basically verse-specific P&As (regarding a given physiology) with extra steps (most notably on also listing the stats each physiology has).
Considering that apparently Teleport allows to immediately travel between Kanto and Johto, unlike Fly, I wonder if that'd lead to a range upgrade (compared to what we currently have for fully evolved stuff), even if only specifically for users of that move on that regard.
Also, before I forget...
Nomura has said that the ending of KH would be done in a manner where there wouldn't be any potential continuation, so it should be rather definitive. Of course, Disney can still make use of the franchise independently of him, so realistically we'd probably get reboots and cameos after that. He...
TBH I'm starting to feel that users are focusing on the High 1-A stuff evaluation-wise when that's no longer the focus, would it be better to just make a separate thread for the hyperspace stuff?
The premise of this thread focused on the yet-to-be-reaccepted hyperspace stuff, the hypertime stuff is already accepted and even he has conceded as much already.
...That'd be regarding the hypertimeline stuff, which'd require its own CRT (and I'm not sure how much more blatant it could be as it follows to the letter stuff in the Tiering System FAQ), the hyperspace stuff is something Qawsed is fine with in the first place.
And then elaborates on that talking about fate manip, which while technically an application of causality (as basically anything with a prior and following state), is not causality manip for the purposes of the wiki. There's not even feats of causality manip (correct me if I'm wrong), just...
The way it's all done in practice leads to that, it only regards to chain of events (fate manip) but does not do events described in the criteria for Causality Manip, I'd prefer more concrete feats for something like that.
And this "causality system" in question being nothing more than fate manip, unless you'd want to imply that basically all fate manip in the verse also includes causality manip.
This is like whenever the word "concept" is thrown around and defaulted out of nowhere to refer to concept manip, whatever a verse deems a thing is not inherently the same as the proper P&A on the site.
I mean, just saying "law of causality" then not explaining what that includes would lead to limit it to what's being displayed in particular, aka, fate manip, as much type 4 acausality is currently limited like that in general to begin with.
Looking at the scans it seems to be talking in context to what'd already fall as "resisting" fate manip by changing what was normally destined to happen (otherwise we may as well merge Fate Manip with Causality Manip site-wide speaking), not actually preventing changes on a cause to effect...
I'd be fine with everything but "resisting" Causality Manip in particular, merely existing outside of the regular system of causality isn't inherently proof of it per the general type 4 revisions to begin with.