- 8,304
- 1,443
i wouldnt say so, unless the threads themselves are outdated. what did the warning say?So going and necro every thread in existence and keep doing so after being told to stop doesn't deserve anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i wouldnt say so, unless the threads themselves are outdated. what did the warning say?So going and necro every thread in existence and keep doing so after being told to stop doesn't deserve anything?
That seems extreme given how new they are and the fact they’re likely just grappling with how we do vs threads here. As long as someone directs them to proper instructions, even a week with possible extension based on what they do afterwards would be enough to gauge if they’re actively trying to improveGood question. Would 3 months be sufficient?
The fact that a thread is being necroed means it's outdatedi wouldnt say so, unless the threads themselves are outdated. what did the warning say?
not necessarily lol it just means people stopped replying for a whileThe fact that a thread is being necroed means it's outdated
I reverted the edit.This new user just made this edit without a CRT
It wasn't really vandalism IMO, just them trying to update the profile to match current events without knowing they needed to make a CRTI reverted the edit.
That's probably a touch egregious for something benign as necro or stomp threads, it's an annoyance rather than something demanding intense action.Good question. Would 3 months be sufficient?
Removed it and warned them.Some dude added a meme quote that doesn't actually exist (a bastardization of a different character's quote) to Jotaro's page.
Which I can only assume to be a shitpost, either way, not appreciated.
Didn't this happen once before?Many powers in this profile were added without having a finished thread and discussion
That seems extreme given how new they are and the fact they’re likely just grappling with how we do vs threads here. As long as someone directs them to proper instructions, even a week with possible extension based on what they do afterwards would be enough to gauge if they’re actively trying to improve
That's probably a touch egregious for something benign as necro or stomp threads, it's an annoyance rather than something demanding intense action.
I'd say a month is warranted.
Just a reminder.We simply forbid a member from creating versus threads alternately even participating in them at all for a certain amount of time, and if they wantonly break the restriction, they receive a real ban instead.
I’m aware it is only a vs thread ban, but banning a very new member from making matches involving what is likely their favourite verse for 3 months simply because their first week of grappling with our system went poorly seems incredibly harsh and likely to simply deter them from being active on the wiki at all. A week long ban acts as both a warning shot, ample time for them to improve their vs thread etiquette, and a not overly long ban time that disproportionately punishes (somewhat) understandable, if not still poor, behaviour on the forum from a new member. If they persist after their ban expires, I’m of course happy with the concept of a longer time-out.Just a reminder.
Many powers in this profile were added without having a finished thread and discussion
I unfortunately have a hard time keeping track of which specific members that have added unreliable information to our Tokyo Revengers pages, so I would appreciate if others are willing to investigate please, and preferably organise revisions to clean up the verse in question afterwards.Cloudyagami was banned last time for two weeks, in light of his many small infractions. It appears he has not shaped up in that time.
I recommend a one month block.
Okay. Maybe two weeks would be enough then.I’m aware it is only a vs thread ban, but banning a very new member from making matches involving what is likely their favourite verse for 3 months simply because their first week of grappling with our system went poorly seems incredibly harsh and likely to simply deter them from being active on the wiki at all. A week long ban acts as both a warning shot, ample time for them to improve their vs thread etiquette, and a not overly long ban time that disproportionately punishes (somewhat) understandable, if not still poor, behaviour on the forum from a new member. If they persist after their ban expires, I’m of course happy with the concept of a longer time-out.
The edits are by a guy named "Steezstifler", and honestly I have a hard time thinking they're malicious. Most of them seem to come from a place of genuine knowledge of the verse, and the only problem is that it is done without any CRT or consultation.I unfortunately have a hard time keeping track of which specific members that have added unreliable information to our Tokyo Revengers pages, so I would appreciate if others are willing to investigate please, and preferably organise revisions to clean up the verse in question afterwards.
Which is translated toQuando caminhando em território aberto, não aborreça ninguém. Se alguém lhe aborrecer, peça-o para parar. Se ele não parar, destrua-o
It simply sounds like a generic edgy anime statement but in fact, it is a text written by one of the students who committed a massacre at a school here in Brasil, saying it is a teaching of the "Satanic Bible". The case is quite famous and changed the perspective of many people in the country, but writing the text of a murderer in the profile description is a bit... strangeWhen walking in open territory, don't annoy anyone. If someone annoys you, ask him to stop. If he doesn't stop, destroy him.
yes, I'm sorry if I did something wrong, it wasn't on purpose
I'll do it now, forgive me, I didn't know that, I got it from an anime publication, please excuse me.Were you aware of what your profile quote was associated with? I don't particularly care if it's from the "satanic bible", but being a quote of a murderer may make it a bit tasteless.
Even if you weren't aware, I'd appreciate it if you removed the quote.
I already removed it, I really didn't know it was from bad people, so I'm sorry for everything, I promise not to put any in thereWere you aware of what your profile quote was associated with? I don't particularly care if it's from the "satanic bible", but being a quote of a murderer may make it a bit tasteless.
Even if you weren't aware, I'd appreciate it if you removed the quote.
Alright I gotta apologize here, I wrongfully attributed the editing of the page to cloudyagami as opposed to the one who had actually done it. Retracting my statement as such, I have no idea who Steezstifler is.Cloudyagami was banned last time for two weeks, in light of his many small infractions. It appears he has not shaped up in that time.
I recommend a one month block.
Steezstifler was already warned once by Ant for a similar infraction, which he didn't respond to. If he fails to respond to this new message (sent by yours truly), then I think punishment is acceptable.Alright I gotta apologize here, I wrongfully attributed the editing of the page to cloudyagami as opposed to the one who had actually done it. Retracting my statement as such, I have no idea who Steezstifler is.
@LIFE_OF_KING In the future when reporting infractions, please link to the revision history of the page and not just the page itself.
thank you so much bro if it wasn't for you i would never have known, sorry for anything.Alright. No worries, then. Do feel free to replace it with another quote, if you like.
Sure@LIFE_OF_KING In the future when reporting infractions, please link to the revision history of the page and not just the page itself
Yup, i dared to disagree with you, that is my crimeI left relevant posts up. You know what you did. Wait for judgement, and certainly don't spam this thread, too. You know better.
The vs thread or the removal thread? Because Bambu deleted several of my posts on the removal threadAlright you two, settle down. I'm looking over the thread, do NOT turn this into another shouting match.