• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Spongebob's gonna **** some verse on this platformšŸ¤£šŸ¤

ImprobableSpicyGoldfish-size_restricted.gif

Hell yeah!
 
Oh, I understand they are undead, but they aren't undead after this arc, right? So they wouldn't qualify for type 7. Or did I miss something?
 
Last edited:
I would argue the string is a lifting strength feat, but it's never really gonna fly here

But anyway, I agree with just about everything
 
Is there somebody else here who is knowledgeable enough to adopt this discussion after Blue left?
 
Thank you.

Can somebody summarise the discussion and conclusions here so far in a sufficiently elaborate but still easy to understand manner please?
 
All of the abilities listed have been accepted and can therefore be applied, and now we will be talking about the speed and lifting strength feats
Okay. That is probably fine then.
 
I wanted to propose 3-C likely higher but your thought seems okay I guess.
Or 3-C possibly 3A. Erased/destroyed all of reality.
 
We only see the Milky Way being affected, but the rest of the space isnā€™t seen. At best, that only looks 3-C via hax since 3-A is kinda vague.
I MEAN the joke is he ends up wrapping EVERYTHING. If he just stopped by unwrapping the the galaxy and left in a black void then I can see 3-C... But clearly he went further beyond that and removed the whole black void which clearly indicates he's higher then that.
 
Has any of the comics or movies expanded on the size of the universe?

If not, then 3-C seems more than fine imo. "At least, 3-C" would be much better tho.

Edit: I don't think 3-A is warranted because we don't know the size of the universe, but shouldn't be capped at 3-C either. So, that's why I think he should get At least 3-c.
 
Well, just 3-C environmental destruction with the string is probably fine then.
 
Has any of the comics or movies expanded on the size of the universe?

If not, then 3-C seems more than fine imo. "At least, 3-C" would be much better tho.

Edit: I don't think 3-A is warranted because we don't know the size of the universe, but shouldn't be capped at 3-C either. So, that's why I think he should get At least 3-c.
Aren't fiction universes in fiction by default assumed to be like our observable universe? 93 billion light years.
Well itā€™s clear Spongebob didnā€™t unravel infinite universes here, just the Milky Way galaxy
Yeah but he didn't stop after destroying the milky way. He later cleared the whole screen which I proposed 3-C likely higher or 3-C possibly 3A as he destroyed everything on screen and left only an empty void.
 
I think 3-C likely higher would be more fitting since we don't have a lot of context regarding the size of the universe, unfortunately
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top