- 7,322
- 5,494
Again, that basically posit that they never truly shifted their entirety into fiction and would just be an avatar with an extra step.The character being able to return to being real after becoming fictional is the proof, as long as the reality-fiction transcendence has evidence substantiating its legitimacy.
If you argue
A.) They have a physical 1-A form and a metaphysical 1-A form, and the metaphysical supersedes the physical and has the ability to shift its state of being. (But this requires explicit evidence)
Then i can concede with that logic
But if you argue
B.) Their 1-A form is the unison or purely metaphysical, and they are bringing this form into the fictional world, and can simply go back to being 1-A through this potential
Then I would disagree, as you would need to first establish this kind of system in FAQ,
which again needed to be established and elaborated first. Which is something as far as I'm aware Bobsican is working on for several months now, but he hasn't shown me stuff yet, so I can't comment on it.Another example could be cosmologies where a higher level originates from the thoughts/beliefs/etc of inhabitants of a lower level; while these thoughts literally originating within the lower reality and then somehow "floating away" to form a higher one would be a disqualifier, no anti-feat is present if the verse has it so these operations simply already exist in a higher reality.
But currently, the argument within the OP is something that lacks enough evidence to properly allow this kind of assumptions