• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What did I say? Murata is such a gooner who only views Fubuki as an object. So sick and tired of these dumb cover pages. This one was especially bad. She's barely wearing anything and the swimsuit looks so lewd. He's not even trying to hide how horny he is anymore. Like we get it, Fubuki is hot. But tone it down man. 0 class as an artist. Purely thinking with his sausage.
cat-meme-laughing-gif.gif
 
What did I say? Murata is such a gooner who only views Fubuki as an object. So sick and tired of these dumb cover pages. This one was especially bad. She's barely wearing anything and the swimsuit looks so lewd. He's not even trying to hide how horny he is anymore. Like we get it, Fubuki is hot. But tone it down man. 0 class as an artist. Purely thinking with his sausage.
Guys don't let him read Chainsaw Man.
 
Apparently, whenever someone gets brought to Fortnite, they get weakened a lot (or something like that).
Saitama's skin is in a glitched style though. There is a specific unknown reason rn, there are theories though, like cuz he's supposed to be invincible etc.

Fortnite's twitter account also talked about it.
 
Saitama's skin is in a glitched style though. There is a specific unknown reason rn, there are theories though, like cuz he's supposed to be invincible etc.

Fortnite's twitter account also talked about it.
Personally, the one I like the most is one that mentions that it is possible that the Saitama we see in Fortnite is VGS Saitama and that's why he is all glitchy. Though I find it unlikely to be true since you'd need to know about such "obscure" Audiobook instead of the plain, popular anime
 
Er I wouldn't jump to conclusions Phoenks. Usually you throw that kind of shade only after something's been proven. It doesn't really look that much like AI, just the background maybe lol. AI is still not usually very good at finer details like shading and wrinkles, plus hands of course. And also the nose.
 
Er I wouldn't jump to conclusions Phoenks. Usually you throw that kind of shade only after something's been proven. It doesn't really look that much like AI, just the background maybe lol. AI is still not usually very good at finer details like shading and wrinkles, plus hands of course. And also the nose.
I didn't realize people today were still this susceptible to blatant AI.

The yellow filter. Shitty, pixelated quality. Lack of any artistic flare or art style. Very strange, almost blurry/glitched out color texture.

You got to be kidding me. If this didn't immediately look like AI to you, you may be cooked my friend.

PfmooSO.png




EDIT: 100% AI generated.

I asked ChatGPT to generate me an image of Saitama, and the resolution GPT generates images in is exactly "1024 x 1536"

Just so happens the image that DBZ sent is also... 1024 x 1536.

Here is the image of Saitama it gave me, if you are curious! It even has the same background lmfao.,

npwhCgD.png
 
Last edited:
I didn't realize people today were still this susceptible to blatant AI.
I agree it seems like AI. As someone who has asked to GPT for images before, I think that one has a suspiciously similar style, filter, background, etc. As the ones GPT generate.

Though maybe it's just a really unfortunate coincidence
The yellow filter. Shitty, pixelated quality. Lack of any artistic flare or art style. Very strange, almost blurry/glitched out color texture.

You got to be kidding me. If this didn't immediately look like AI to you, you may be cooked my friend.

PfmooSO.png
That being said, don't use that page. I just put a MUI Goku image from a manga panel to confirm its reliability and it also screamed red
 
I didn't realize people today were still this susceptible to blatant AI.

The yellow filter. Shitty, pixelated quality. Lack of any artistic flare or art style. Very strange, almost blurry/glitched out color texture.

You got to be kidding me. If this didn't immediately look like AI to you, you may be cooked my friend.

PfmooSO.png




EDIT: 100% AI generated.

I asked ChatGPT to generate me an image of Saitama, and the resolution GPT generates images in is exactly "1024 x 1536"

Just so happens the image that DBZ sent is also... 1024 x 1536.

Here is the image of Saitama it gave me, if you are curious! It even has the same background lmfao.,

npwhCgD.png
I didn't say it definitely wasn't AI tbf, I just said it's not so blatant that I'd start calling him out without providing a better reason, as such a jump can often lead to a mistake. Though tbf the guy has a reputation for not being the most polite member of the thread so I understand if you were more quick to call it out for that.

I did think it had a weird background which I figured was a generic "click and add" background for the software used, but I didn't think the actual drawing was so blatantly AI that I'd jump to calling it out. Bear in mind AI has actually advanced enough that sometimes it IS hard to tell the difference, last I messed around with it, it wasn't as good at providing details to the drawings, but I'm not really as avid on the internet these days. This image is a more obvious case, the other one looks closer to a real drawing. Anyways like I said my point wasn't about that, but about making quick conclusions, if that helps to clarify.
 
I didn't say it definitely wasn't AI tbf, I just said it's not so blatant that I'd start calling him out without providing a better reason, as such a jump can often lead to a mistake. Though tbf the guy has a reputation for not being the most polite member of the thread so I understand if you were more quick to call it out for that.

I did think it had a weird background which I figured was a generic "click and add" background for the software used, but I didn't think the actual drawing was so blatantly AI that I'd jump to calling it out. Bear in mind AI has actually advanced enough that sometimes it IS hard to tell the difference, last I messed around with it, it wasn't as good at providing details to the drawings, but I'm not really as avid on the internet these days. This image is a more obvious case, the other one looks closer to a real drawing. Anyways like I said my point wasn't about that, but about making quick conclusions, if that helps to clarify.
That's a lot of words to say you're not capable of identifying blatant AI. This is not the kind of image that requires a more deep analysis. If you weren't able to immediately tell that was AI, you're behind.

Sorry to say, but you really should work on that. Not trying to be rude or anything but you genuinely can't be so gullible in this day and age.
 
That's a lot of words to say you're not capable of identifying blatant AI. This is not the kind of image that requires a more deep analysis. If you weren't able to immediately tell that was AI, you're behind.
You've entirely disregarded the actual context of what I was saying so as to insult me, why even reply dude? Rhetorical question.
Sorry to say, but you really should work on that.
As I elaborated, I didn't say it wasn't AI, I actually said it has elements that I think could signify being AI, but that I wouldn't jump to denouncing someone over something I interpreted. I can identify AI like 99% of the time, and I figured it certainly COULD have been AI, too, maybe even likely was, and that also isn't the most obvious case of AI despite how much you may want to imply. And...again, for like the third time now, that isn't even the point, but I think you're too focused on the topic of discussion than on the actual meaning of my words.
Not trying to be rude or anything but you genuinely can't be so gullible in this day and age.
You're asserting a lot about me from like a 3 message conversation, which usually comes off as rude, just fyi for future conversations. You don't need to double down on things, though that's a common thing.
 
Anyways did ONE deadass forget about Watchdog Man we haven't seen him in like...years, right? Did he make a short appearance in Neo Heroes arc I'm just forgetting.
 
Back
Top