Twisted_Little_Raven
She/Her- 3,566
- 1,921
What is it??No one said that the next tier beyond Senjumaru is WSK tier.
Yes the **** I didYou have not proven that Ichibe cannot be sensed. Hitchen's razor gg.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is it??No one said that the next tier beyond Senjumaru is WSK tier.
Yes the **** I didYou have not proven that Ichibe cannot be sensed. Hitchen's razor gg.
What's the tier below WSK?What is it??
You didn't. You spoke in fractured english and made claims unsubstantiated. You have yet to even justify why Ichibe being beyond Shutara makes him unable to be sensed.Yes the **** I did
I didn't say Arc's side was the silly oneThe fact I had to explain that is crazy. Y'all are dumb I'm done with this debate
Nothing here is an argument.My argument is, Ichibei has never been sensed just like Chrysalis Aizen. The rebuttal was, he wasn't directly stayed to be unsensible. But the thing is, its not it's own tier. Saying Aizen is unsensible but not Ichibei, means you treat unsensible as it's own tier.
Alright I'm gunna explain it one more time so children can understand. Because y'all clearly don't.
The rebuttal was not "he isn't stated to be unsensible". Your argument was that Ichibe wasn't explicitly stated/shown to be sensed therefore he cannot be sensed (using Grimmjow as the person doing the sensing). The refutation to this was "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". Since you are claiming the absence of evidence (absence of direct statements/showings that Ichibe can be sensed) is evidence of absence (proof Ichibe cannot be sensed). That is a logical fallacy, and thus defeats your argument. It is an argument from ignorance; however, you have conceded to being intentionally ignorant so who is really surprised here.My argument is, Ichibei has never been sensed just like Chrysalis Aizen. The rebuttal was, he wasn't directly stayed to be unsensible. But the thing is, its not it's own tier. Saying Aizen is unsensible but not Ichibei, means you treat unsensible as it's own tier.
The reason Condom Aizen is above Shutara's true power is for the following reason: people weaker than the likes of Kisuke and Isshin who are base Aizen level are likely capable of sensing Shutara's Bankai as we see them react to the permeation of her reiatsu (which would indicate they can perceive it in some manner), meanwhile these stronger characters (Kisuke and Isshin) cannot sense Condom Aizen. Therefore Condom Aizen is stronger. Condom Aizen (unsensible) > Kisuke and Isshin ~ base Aizen > Shunsui < Shutara's Bankai (sensible), therefore Condom Aizen > Shutara's Bankai.But unsensible depends on you and your opponent. So you literally can't use the argument without accepting it as it's own tier. You keep saying you aren't saying it's it's own tier but I don't think you realize applying it to Aizen must mean you upscale Aizen to all Shinigami not stated to be transcendent or WSK. As of right now Chrysalis Aizen is upscaling anybody not WSK level. And because you keep using the term unsensible it means you applying the ability to be sensed as it's own class of tier/being when its based on you and your opponent.
I explain above why this isn't my argument.So if I say Ichibei can't be sensed and you say he was never stated to be unsensible this means you are acting like Aizen is unsensible to any being not WSK or higher. You didn't say this, but your argument is saying this by default.
Don't use the Lord's name in vainJesus Christ
Bulverism moment. Concession accepted tho.The fact I had to explain that is crazy. Y'all are dumb I'm done with this debate
People like Chad and the Sternritter who got no sold by Shutara's Bankai react to the reiatsu. GG on the concession tho.Reacting to the realms being shaken and not her actual reiatsu esp since Gerard and sternritter didn't even know she got stronger but yes it is concession
Minor spelling error GG.Don't use the Lord's name in vein![]()
Edited + nuh uhMinor spelling error GG.
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/601322745468420096/1197731039787888650/Screenshot_2024-01-18-21-34-47-797.jpg?ex=65bc54f4&is=65a9dff4&hm=d3d067979dfd46c1c6409ef6a028e03155c11f16456fb7866a18316fe56e13b5&Don't use the Lord's name in vain![]()
I don't believe in godhttps://cdn.**********.com/attachments/601322745468420096/1197731039787888650/Screenshot_2024-01-18-21-34-47-797.jpg?ex=65bc54f4&is=65a9dff4&hm=d3d067979dfd46c1c6409ef6a028e03155c11f16456fb7866a18316fe56e13b5&
No bias here for sure
Rent freed + I do like Arcker more than you + insane copiumhttps://cdn.**********.com/attachments/601322745468420096/1197731039787888650/Screenshot_2024-01-18-21-34-47-797.jpg?ex=65bc54f4&is=65a9dff4&hm=d3d067979dfd46c1c6409ef6a028e03155c11f16456fb7866a18316fe56e13b5&
No bias here for sure
You can do the same thing on the profile pages with control+f!All I had to search was Jesus Christ
Again, if you were smart you'd realize the point is that you even taking the time to look for it at all is dickeating.All I had to search was Jesus Christ
Failure to fulfill the burden of proof. But like I agree I am biased when it comes to who I want to spend my time with, and with respect to this scenario I am biased towards my friendship with Arcker over yours. However, that doesn't mean I cannot maintain impartiality in debates. I simply think your claims and arguments are incorrect. You even conceded, and are coping with the loss by crying "Arc is biased, he's a big meanie, Arcker is a little boy, I'm superior to him". Like ok buddy no one cares, hop off.No need I already showed why with my last screenshot and I already proved many times y'all are biased and it's too Long to go over all of it
All the toxicity is just two people arguing with each other and everybody watching ******** on the loser.HOLY SHIT, I spent like 4 hours grinding League, and y'all are more toxic than all my matches combined. That's why I like this thread; I don't think there's a thread more toxic than this one.
The latter has nothing to do with the debate and it's just me stating that he is. Hop off?? He butted himself in even tho I was trying to ignore him. Stop being slowFailure to fulfill the burden of proof. But like I agree I am biased when it comes to who I want to spend my time with, and with respect to this scenario I am biased towards my friendship with Arcker over yours. However, that doesn't mean I cannot maintain impartiality in debates. I simply think your claims and arguments are incorrect. You even conceded, and are coping with the loss by crying "Arc is biased, he's a big meanie, Arcker is a little boy, I'm superior to him". Like ok buddy no one cares, hop off.