• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Scp 3812 upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
This proves you haven't read the articles I've provided you.

Please, do so. All scans you're sending are already answered by the SCP Foundation Cosmology blog and by the Narrativistics and you article I've sent you. Hell, even SCP-3812 page clarifies that
 
This proves you haven't read the articles I've provided you.

Please, do so. All scans you're sending are already answered by the SCP Foundation Cosmology blog and by the Narrativistics and you article I've sent you. Hell, even SCP-3812 page clarifies that
look my friend you don't want to understand you still haven't proved that your transcendences are fake, it doesn't say such a thing in the place you threw, it is called a dark other place for 682, also scp 3812 exceeds its own author, it is obvious that you are lying from here, the control of the author cannot be in 3812. https://imgur.com/gallery/9KuyjIP https://imgur.com/gallery/Im3taiL
 
Again, I already told you 682 interaction with 3812 is not canon due to not being older than 2 months; and the supposed author he trascended is not a Swann Entity as the ones who follow Placeholder.

Please... read.
 
Again, I already told you 682 interaction with 3812 is not canon due to not being older than 2 months; and the supposed author he trascended is not a Swann Entity as the ones who follow Placeholder.

Please... read.
Now can you prove to me that it's non canon if it's not older than 2 months? Also in the scp universe the writers are swanns. Can you prove to me that the author is not a swann? https://imgur.com/gallery/ODQKbc8
 
Now can you prove to me that it's non canon if it's not older than 2 months?
I'd asked time ago in the SCP Discussion Thread how much it is needed for an article at the Termination Log to be considered canon and people told me that at least 2 months. You can ask it by yourself if you want
Also in the scp universe the writers are swanns. Can you prove to me that the author is not a swann? https://imgur.com/gallery/ODQKbc8
I already sent you proof of that. Have you really read that, as you claim?
 
I'd asked time ago in the SCP Discussion Thread how much it is needed for an article at the Termination Log to be considered canon and people told me that at least 2 months. You can ask it by yourself if you want

I already sent you proof of that. Have you really read that, as you claim?
Did the people who said that to you provide any evidence?I have read it, but if there is an article that says that the author is not swann, can you send me a ss?
 
Did the people who said that to you provide any evidence?
It is wiki's standard. You could ask any admin who supports SCP for more information 
I have read it, but if there is an article that says that the author is not swann, can you send me a ss?
I already sent you two articles which literally treat the subject of SCP-3812 not trascending his author. There is no need to repeat myself
 
It is wiki's standard. You could ask any admin who supports SCP for more information 

I already sent you two articles which literally treat the subject of SCP-3812 not trascending his author. There is no need to repeat myself
i didn't see any non canon article on the wiki or blogs because it hasn't been 2 months. also they don't say anything about 3812 overcoming his author there? there are multiple authors in the scp universe and it's normal that he can overcome one but not the other, isn't that normal? And it can't be an antifeat that he can't transcend that author because the swanns are the ones who write the narratives and since his transcendence is with the narratives, it can be normal that he can't transcend. also I couldn't find a situation like fake narratives even though I read it again. even if there is, you have to prove to me that they are the same feat because how can he transcend narratives in one feat and fake narratives in the other feat?
 
also they don't say anything about 3812 overcoming his author there?
there are multiple authors in the scp universe and it's normal that he can overcome one but not the other, isn't that normal?
And that is exactly the reason why its narratives are not the ones which form Pataspheres. Because the Placeholder, which is the canon that mixtures all multiple canons, states that SCP-3812 trascending narratives is part of a single canon, and, as thus, not related with the narrative said model purposes. Again, it is detailly explained in the SCP Foundation Cosmology blog.
And it can't be an antifeat that he can't transcend that author because the swanns are the ones who write the narratives and since his transcendence is with the narratives, it can be normal that he can't transcend.
It is not an anti feat. It's just that he does not trascend the narratives where the Swann's are located.
also I couldn't find a situation like fake narratives even though I read it again. even if there is, you have to prove to me that they are the same feat because how can he transcend narratives in one feat and fake narratives in the other feat?
In the SCP Foundation cosmology blog and Narrativistics and you (as I've endlessly repeated up until now) is explicitelly stated with proof that the narratives SCP-3812 ascends according to its article are not the ones Placeholder model treats, but fake/lesser narratives that exist within a single canon.
 
And that is exactly the reason why its narratives are not the ones which form Pataspheres. Because the Placeholder, which is the canon that mixtures all multiple canons, states that SCP-3812 trascending narratives is part of a single canon, and, as thus, not related with the narrative said model purposes. Again, it is detailly explained in the SCP Foundation Cosmology blog.

It is not an anti feat. It's just that he does not trascend the narratives where the Swann's are located.

In the SCP Foundation cosmology blog and Narrativistics and you (as I've endlessly repeated up until now) is explicitelly stated with proof that the narratives SCP-3812 ascends according to its article are not the ones Placeholder model treats, but fake/lesser narratives that exist within a single canon.
The thing is that there is no antifeat here, since you don't want to understand, I will now explain it to you with proofs. first of all we know that scp 3812 will exceed the infinite narrative

https://imgur.com/gallery/JaOb6l8

and what's being said in these places you're throwing is that there are higher narratives of Placeholder.

https://imgur.com/gallery/IJCp4BV

and we know that the narratives exceeding scp 3812 were made by djkaktus. and if there are infinite ones, why not the uncountable infinite narratives of Placeholder?
Infinite (∞) and uncountable infinite are mathematical concepts and there are some differences between them.

Infinite (∞): Infinity is a symbolic representation of the concept of "infinity" in mathematics. A number reaches infinity when it approaches an infinitely large value. Infinity is a concept, not a number. In mathematics, it represents a special value. For example, in limit calculations, it is used to represent the infinity of points that paths must approach.

Uncountable Infinite: In mathematics, there are two types of infinite: countable infinite (continuum) and uncountable infinite (numbers above the set of natural numbers). The uncountable infinite is a larger concept than the countable infinite. The countable infinite is defined as a set that can be ordered by counting, like the natural numbers, and all its elements can be numbered, while the uncountable infinite is defined as a set that cannot be numbered with integers, like the real numbers. The concept of uncountable infinite is used to refer to numbers that are not countable, such as Cesaro numbers, irrational numbers, transcendental numbers.

Consequently, infinity (∞) is a symbol representing an infinitely large value, whereas uncountable infinity is a larger concept than countable infinity, which is defined as a set.
or a higher level narrative.. why not? That doesn't make djkaktus' narratives fake.

As I said, scp 3812 transcends infinitely, the other author may have uncountably infinite narratives, this does not disprove the feat of 3812, and even if it does not go beyond the swanns, it does not change that it destroys infinitely transcending pataspheres.

 
The thing is that there is no antifeat here, since you don't want to understand, I will now explain it to you with proofs. first of all we know that scp 3812 will exceed the infinite narrative

https://imgur.com/gallery/JaOb6l8
Cool, already taken in account and does not grant any upgrade
and what's being said in these places you're throwing is that there are higher narratives of Placeholder.

https://imgur.com/gallery/IJCp4BV

and we know that the narratives exceeding scp 3812 were made by djkaktus. and if there are infinite ones, why not the uncountable infinite narratives of Placeholder?
Infinite (∞) and uncountable infinite are mathematical concepts and there are some differences between them.
The point is that:
There is no proof SCP-3812 will ascend past Placeholder narratives. In fact, the very placeholder model says that SCP-3812 ascending narratives is something its author from Proxyverse –who is, was, and will always remain unaffected by anything that happens in SCP Foundation Narratives– imposed. Not Ben, the Swann entities identified as Djkaktus.

They are not "uncountable infinite" narratives; they are not the same narratives to begin with.
Consequently, infinity (∞) is a symbol representing an infinitely large value, whereas uncountable infinity is a larger concept than countable infinity, which is defined as a set.
or a higher level narrative.. why not? That doesn't make djkaktus' narratives fake.

As I said, scp 3812 transcends infinitely, the other author may have uncountably infinite narratives, this does not disprove the feat of 3812, and even if it does not go beyond the swanns, it does not change that it destroys infinitely transcending pataspheres.


The point is: the other author does not have uncountable infinite narratives. They are not the same narratives to begin with.

The Narratives Placeholder model purposes are something in which, by their definition, beings like SCP-3812 explicitely cannot ascend (see Narrativistics and you).
 
Hi everyone, Today I will make an attempt to raise this situation because the character scp 3812 is in a lower tier than it should be.first of all, the foundation is making a measuring instrument called hume for the changes in reality in the universe. https://imgur.com/gallery/mllBwyV and while this instrument can measure the value of all reality manipulators, the ability of scp 3812 is said to be "immeasurable". https://imgur.com/gallery/p6F9WMg because of this promise, I think it is right to make scp 3812 immeasurable layer to reality warping hax.
Let's analyse your evidence:

"When James Caldmann and Carlos Rzewski devised the Hume as a way to measure alterations in local reality, they probably saved the Foundation. Reality benders have always been the foot-long thorn in our side, the one we really couldn't get our heads around. How do you combat or contain something that can blink you into non-existence? Thanks to Dr. Scranton, we had the reality anchors, but they only worked half the time and were less than useless the other half. We didn't know how they worked, and we weren't using them right."

It mentions a measuring device called Hume, which is said to be the bane of Reality Warping owners.

"The second option is that SCP-3812 exists at a much higher Hume value than anything we've ever tested. This would be pretty bad, as we've pointed our counters at anomalies that some would consider to be gods and we've gotten readings off of them. That being said, something with a Hume value so high that it cannot be measured with our equipment would likely have already destroyed us. Since SCP-3812 hasn't done that, it's likely not this.

The last option is the worst. The last option is that SCP-3812 cannot be measured in Humes, because it's doing something else. Whatever fundamental aspect of its nature that allows it to warp reality is not the same aspect as literally everything else we have ever come across. Scranton hypothesized that there might be higher and lower dimensions of reality, different levels of manipulation in the grand construction of the universe. The difference between manipulating a rock with your hands and manipulating a rock with an atom bomb. He called the thing being manipulated the "narrative", and suggested that the narratives were stacked on top of either other, each creating the narrative of the narrative below it, and so on, until you reached some sort of dead space below them all."


As we can understand here, there is a state of probability, i.e. we are given "options". One of them is that it cannot be measured in Humes. In this case, there is not even a certain fact. But let's say it is certain, still the Immeasurable Layer cannot give it. I guess you don't know anything about the situation in Vsb. What we call a layer cannot be given with such a simple expression. If it is said that something cannot be measured, that thing does not get a direct layer. We should even discuss whether this situation even gives a layer. Immesurable Layer is not such a simple thing.

"But what of that entity? Would it not share the same limitations withing its reality as we do within ours? It may exist within a higher tier than usi but surely it must follow the same rules we do. But who sets those rules? An entity higher than that? One that supersedes not only us, but the entity that supersedes us, and the one after that as well? Where did the echelon originate, then? Who or what was the original architect of the architecture?

It is unlikely that we will ever know anything about the being or beings that supersede us (if they even exist), not in any tangible way, let alone any being that would supersede them. It may very well be that we are just one of an infinite number of realities, stacked on top of each other in every direction, influencing those below us and being influenced by those above us. This echelon, upon which sits ourselves and everything that ever was or wwill be, would likely be the most fundamental aspect of the organization of creation. The every foundtaion of all things.

I have often hypothesized on the nature of the echelon, if it even exists, and about whether it would be possible for an entity to see other realities above them or below them. We are currently able to manipulate our own reality, albeit in crude and imperfect waysi and our ability to travel through space is limited at best. It is likely that the only entity capable of ascending through this hypothetical echelon would be one that, by virtue of its very nature, must supersede anything that supersedes it. Such an entity would, as the end results of the logic of its creation, be forced to supersede itself, spiraling ever upwards through the tiers of reality, unable to break free from the bonds of its nature. Perhabs this entity may even someday supersede its creator, and become a host unto itself, the pinnacle above all other pinnacles. A tower that, as a part of its design, must be higher than every other tower, including itself."


The main issue here actually occurs exactly in the last paragraph. It is constantly mentioned that there is a transcendence. This situation was summed up by the following sentence: "Perhabs this entity may even someday supersede its creator, and become a host unto itself, the pinnacle above all other pinnacles. A tower that, as a part of its design, must be higher than every other tower, including itself."

I can understand the situation here, and I can agree with what Zeinx said first. But in no evidence he throws, he does not tell us that these realities are at Tier 0 and surpass each other. But let's say they exceed each other, which again corresponds to a scale such as High 1-B, and again it would be insufficient for Tier 0. We have been told that it is associated with the Patasphere, but we cannot see this in any evidence. In addition, I have examined the proof he added at the end of his own article, but still I have not found anything related to the "Patasphere".

I think you got a lot of help from here when you were writing all these. And I want to tell you this: if you have read it, I think you should check it out again. Because you misunderstood the writes here. Finally, I would like to say this, in Discord by telling your friends to write "Agree" on CRT, you are filling up a CRT for nothing and you cannot win in a CRT this way. What you are doing is unethical and very "cringe".
 
Last edited:
Cool, already taken in account and does not grant any upgrade

The point is that:
There is no proof SCP-3812 will ascend past Placeholder narratives. In fact, the very placeholder model says that SCP-3812 ascending narratives is something its author from Proxyverse –who is, was, and will always remain unaffected by anything that happens in SCP Foundation Narratives– imposed. Not Ben, the Swann entities identified as Djkaktus.

They are not "uncountable infinite" narratives; they are not the same narratives to begin with.

The point is: the other author does not have uncountable infinite narratives. They are not the same narratives to begin with.

The Narratives Placeholder model purposes are something in which, by their definition, beings like SCP-3812 explicitely cannot ascend (see Narrativistics and you).

Let's analyse your evidence:

"When James Caldmann and Carlos Rzewski devised the Hume as a way to measure alterations in local reality, they probably saved the Foundation. Reality benders have always been the foot-long thorn in our side, the one we really couldn't get our heads around. How do you combat or contain something that can blink you into non-existence? Thanks to Dr. Scranton, we had the reality anchors, but they only worked half the time and were less than useless the other half. We didn't know how they worked, and we weren't using them right."

It mentions a measuring device called Hume, which is said to be the bane of Reality Warping owners.

"The second option is that SCP-3812 exists at a much higher Hume value than anything we've ever tested. This would be pretty bad, as we've pointed our counters at anomalies that some would consider to be gods and we've gotten readings off of them. That being said, something with a Hume value so high that it cannot be measured with our equipment would likely have already destroyed us. Since SCP-3812 hasn't done that, it's likely not this.

The last option is the worst. The last option is that SCP-3812 cannot be measured in Humes, because it's doing something else. Whatever fundamental aspect of its nature that allows it to warp reality is not the same aspect as literally everything else we have ever come across. Scranton hypothesized that there might be higher and lower dimensions of reality, different levels of manipulation in the grand construction of the universe. The difference between manipulating a rock with your hands and manipulating a rock with an atom bomb. He called the thing being manipulated the "narrative", and suggested that the narratives were stacked on top of either other, each creating the narrative of the narrative below it, and so on, until you reached some sort of dead space below them all."


As we can understand here, there is a state of probability, i.e. we are given "options". One of them is that it cannot be measured in Humes. In this case, there is not even a certain fact. But let's say it is certain, still the Immeasurable Layer cannot give it. I guess you don't know anything about the situation in Vsb. What we call a layer cannot be given with such a simple expression. If it is said that something cannot be measured, that thing does not get a direct layer. We should even discuss whether this situation even gives a layer. Immesurable Layer is not such a simple thing.

"But what of that entity? Would it not share the same limitations withing its reality as we do within ours? It may exist within a higher tier than usi but surely it must follow the same rules we do. But who sets those rules? An entity higher than that? One that supersedes not only us, but the entity that supersedes us, and the one after that as well? Where did the echelon originate, then? Who or what was the original architect of the architecture?

It is unlikely that we will ever know anything about the being or beings that supersede us (if they even exist), not in any tangible way, let alone any being that would supersede them. It may very well be that we are just one of an infinite number of realities, stacked on top of each other in every direction, influencing those below us and being influenced by those above us. This echelon, upon which sits ourselves and everything that ever was or wwill be, would likely be the most fundamental aspect of the organization of creation. The every foundtaion of all things.

I have often hypothesized on the nature of the echelon, if it even exists, and about whether it would be possible for an entity to see other realities above them or below them. We are currently able to manipulate our own reality, albeit in crude and imperfect waysi and our ability to travel through space is limited at best. It is likely that the only entity capable of ascending through this hypothetical echelon would be one that, by virtue of its very nature, must supersede anything that supersedes it. Such an entity would, as the end results of the logic of its creation, be forced to supersede itself, spiraling ever upwards through the tiers of reality, unable to break free from the bonds of its nature. Perhabs this entity may even someday supersede its creator, and become a host unto itself, the pinnacle above all other pinnacles. A tower that, as a part of its design, must be higher than every other tower, including itself."


The main issue here actually occurs exactly in the last paragraph. It is constantly mentioned that there is a transcendence. This situation was summed up by the following sentence: "Perhabs this entity may even someday supersede its creator, and become a host unto itself, the pinnacle above all other pinnacles. A tower that, as a part of its design, must be higher than every other tower, including itself."

I can understand the situation here, and I can agree with what Zeinx said first. But in no evidence he throws, he does not tell us that these realities are at Tier 0 and surpass each other. But let's say they exceed each other, which again corresponds to a scale such as High 1-B, and again it would be insufficient for Tier 0. We have been told that it is associated with the Patasphere, but we cannot see this in any evidence. In addition, I have examined the proof he added at the end of his own article, but still I have not found anything related to the "Patasphere".

I think you got a lot of help from here when you were writing all these. And I want to tell you this: if you have read it, I think you should check it out again. Because you misunderstood the writes here. Finally, I would like to say this, in Discord by telling your friends to write "Agree" on CRT, you are filling up a CRT for nothing and you cannot win in a CRT this way. What you are doing is unethical and very "cringe".
there are possibilities yes but 2 out of 3 possibilities are related to humps and the other one is a completely different issue we need to deal with these 2 possibilities. and if you read the crt you would realize that the 2 possibilities lead to the situation that humps cannot be measured. and with a little blog research you would know that humps give imme layer. you can talk to vegeta if you don't believe it. and for the patasphere thing. narratives equals patasphere. what i put as proof at the end was about the panels being real i don't know why i forgot to put imguru. patasphere equals narrative and the beginning of patasphere is 0 in a normal patasphere wiki
https://imgur.com/OyOx4Peh.jpg also why not being able to measure with infinite hume values that are superior to each other should not give you imme layer i proved above that they are superior to each other
 
Cool, already taken in account and does not grant any upgrade

The point is that:
There is no proof SCP-3812 will ascend past Placeholder narratives. In fact, the very placeholder model says that SCP-3812 ascending narratives is something its author from Proxyverse –who is, was, and will always remain unaffected by anything that happens in SCP Foundation Narratives– imposed. Not Ben, the Swann entities identified as Djkaktus.

They are not "uncountable infinite" narratives; they are not the same narratives to begin with.

The point is: the other author does not have uncountable infinite narratives. They are not the same narratives to begin with.

The Narratives Placeholder model purposes are something in which, by their definition, beings like SCP-3812 explicitely cannot ascend (see Narrativistics and you).
As I said, the other author may have more narrative, but does that change the fact that he transcends the infinite narrative?
 
there are possibilities yes but 2 out of 3 possibilities are related to humps and the other one is a completely different issue we need to deal with these 2 possibilities. and if you read the crt you would realize that the 2 possibilities lead to the situation that humps cannot be measured. and with a little blog research you would know that humps give imme layer. you can talk to vegeta if you don't believe it. and for the patasphere thing. narratives equals patasphere. what i put as proof at the end was about the panels being real i don't know why i forgot to put imguru. patasphere equals narrative and the beginning of patasphere is 0 in a normal patasphere wiki
https://imgur.com/OyOx4Peh.jpg also why not being able to measure with infinite hume values that are superior to each other should not give you imme layer i proved above that they are superior to each other

If the person you are talking about is Ubeyde, I have already spoken to him and he agree with me. Also, as I said in my own article, the Immeasurable Layer is not given in this way. Please read the VSB. Also, stop talking about the people we're talking about on Discord. This is a Vsb and an official place. Do not make ridiculous movements.

Is this a joke?
 
If the person you are talking about is Ubeyde, I have already spoken to him and he agree with me. Also, as I said in my own article, the Immeasurable Layer is not given in this way. Please read the VSB. Also, stop talking about the people we're talking about on Discord. This is a Vsb and an official place. Do not make ridiculous movements.

Is this a joke?
how can not being able to measure with an instrument that can measure infinitely many, superior to each other not give you an immesurable layer? also ubeyde knows that 0^immesurable in the scp universe. i don't know why the imgur photos didn't open. i upload them from my phone and post them again.

patasphere = narrative

(https://imgur.com/gallery/HsNz7hT)

infinite hume value

(https://imgur.com/gallery/xpvCc62)
 
As far as I read, I don't see anything wrong with the scale and after what you wrote, I read the story and the arguments given and as a result of all this, I think it should be accepted, in short, I agree.
 
yesterday I also wanted to submit H1A, with this feats SCP-682 said that SCP-3812 is above SCP-5800 but saikou wanted not to contradict keter duty or bilith Narrativistic even though it was canon And also saikou want SCP-3812 different version? Idk.I honestly don't like bilith Narrativistic

But it's better for me to be neutral first Elyan also has not elaborated, I also haven't read this full thread maybe later I will read it again
 
If you want, I can tell you this from DC, eaxar
This definitely won't give you 0. I passed 0, it won't even give h1a. The expression "immeasurable" is just a stat that stays with WoG, so if there is no indicator supporting it, it will remain just an expression in the novel. Moreover, this expression "immeasurable" requires higher realities of this ability to create a layered inaccessibility. There is a need for an indication of how it affects and creates a layered hierarchy. In the novel, of course, it makes the context of this immeasurable level insufficient. There is more, and you know DC fordrax_
 
This definitely won't give you 0. I passed 0, it won't even give h1a. The expression "immeasurable" is just a stat that stays with WoG, so if there is no indicator supporting it, it will remain just an expression in the novel. Moreover, this expression "immeasurable" requires higher realities of this ability to create a layered inaccessibility. There is a need for an indication of how it affects and creates a layered hierarchy. In the novel, of course, it makes the context of this immeasurable level insufficient. There is more, and you know DC fordrax_
Let me also say this, do not forget that the immeasurable level will never give 0 for 1a. If the level of inaccessibility is created only with sufficient expressions and indicators, it only requires non-corporeal transcendences for higher realities, for which you need a compound hierarchy. The expression immeasurable for talent is insufficient for the immeasurable layer, and 0. Even if you equate it with ap, it doesn't even get higher than 1a due to insufficient context, which is valid for non-corporeal transcendence.
 
This definitely won't give you 0. I passed 0, it won't even give h1a. The expression "immeasurable" is just a stat that stays with WoG, so if there is no indicator supporting it, it will remain just an expression in the novel. Moreover, this expression "immeasurable" requires higher realities of this ability to create a layered inaccessibility. There is a need for an indication of how it affects and creates a layered hierarchy. In the novel, of course, it makes the context of this immeasurable level insufficient. There is more, and you know DC fordrax_
Are you sure you read the scan properly?
 
This definitely won't give you 0. I passed 0, it won't even give h1a. The expression "immeasurable" is just a stat that stays with WoG, so if there is no indicator supporting it, it will remain just an expression in the novel. Moreover, this expression "immeasurable" requires higher realities of this ability to create a layered inaccessibility. There is a need for an indication of how it affects and creates a layered hierarchy. In the novel, of course, it makes the context of this immeasurable level insufficient. There is more, and you know DC fordrax_
Let me also say this, do not forget that the immeasurable level will never give 0 for 1a. If the level of inaccessibility is created only with sufficient expressions and indicators, it only requires non-corporeal transcendences for higher realities, for which you need a compound hierarchy. The expression immeasurable for talent is insufficient for the immeasurable layer, and 0. Even if you equate it with ap, it doesn't even get higher than 1a due to insufficient context, which is valid for non-corporeal transcendence.
first of all, I'm not sure you understand scanning well. because I don't give 1a or 0 from the word immesurable. I give 0, (at the very least) pataspheres and narratives are the same thing

(https://imgur.com/gallery/HsNz7hT)

there are infinite narratives and each one sees the other as fiction

(https://imgur.com/gallery/bKhUzV8)

(https://imgur.com/gallery/JaOb6l8)

scp 3812 surpasses them all (I posted above) and the patasphere minimum is 0 (as confirmed by the wiki). As for immeasurable hume is a tool for recognizing changes in reality in the universe.

(https://imgur.com/gallery/mllBwyV)

there are infinite hume values (https://imgur.com/gallery/xpvCc62) and a scp measured with 2 hume values cannot be measured with 1 hume value (I couldn't find that story right now, so I'm throwing a story with a low hume value and a high hume value instead, I think this is enough. if you say no, I'll find that story if you say no, I threw the high low thing in my messages above) but scp 3812 cannot be measured even with infinite hume at the top, while infinite hume value and each one remains immeasurable for the other, so I find it correct to give immeasurable/infinite layer
 
Dostum, bu benim anlaşmazlığım..

first of all, I'm not sure you understand scanning well. because I don't give 1a or 0 from the word immesurable. I give 0, (at the very least) pataspheres and narratives are the same thing

(https://imgur.com/gallery/HsNz7hT)

there are infinite narratives and each one sees the other as fiction

(https://imgur.com/gallery/bKhUzV8)

(https://imgur.com/gallery/JaOb6l8)

scp 3812 surpasses them all (I posted above) and the patasphere minimum is 0 (as confirmed by the wiki). As for immeasurable hume is a tool for recognizing changes in reality in the universe.

(https://imgur.com/gallery/mllBwyV)

there are infinite hume values (https://imgur.com/gallery/xpvCc62) and a scp measured with 2 hume values cannot be measured with 1 hume value (I couldn't find that story right now, so I'm throwing a story with a low hume value and a high hume value instead, I think this is enough. if you say no, I'll find that story if you say no, I threw the high low thing in my messages above) but scp 3812 cannot be measured even with infinite hume at the top, while infinite hume value and each one remains immeasurable for the other, so I find it correct to give immeasurable/infinite layer
This is not what I said, contact me via eaxar dc or Instagram
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top