- 4,814
- 2,694
Wait, if I understand correctly, acasuality 5 is a hyped acasuality 4. If you have type 5 does it mean no one should be able to interact with you at all
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Duality and Conceptual Duality
- Thread starter Fixxed
- Start date
- 10,764
- 18,668
- 4,814
- 2,694
But in recent posts it said if others can still interact with you its an anti-feat?
Why is it an anti-feat instead of an interaction feat for everyone? Or is it that only aca 5 can interact with Aca 5
- 4,814
- 2,694
I don't understand what you're trying to say
- 10,764
- 18,668
Neither i.
- 10,764
- 18,668
Practically I understand that they want to give Graham's nothingness Aca 5 or TD (only if the order is accepted as dualities). But I hope they do not forget that reason is still above all and both Venuz and MEoCD govern above reason, order, basically everything in the verse.
Sniper670
He/Him- 6,409
- 1,366
Many Aca 4 are just Aca 5 with anti feats
A being described as Aca 5 but normal people who aren't described as such, can interact with him, is an anti feat that would get your ass kicked to Aca 4
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
I don't know which verse has Acausality type 4 as type 5 with anti feats but Misfits completely exist outside of worlds framework in MG. Also Root is main existence so physical body is just projection that's all. Not everyone can interact with roots.
It's not like zepes can go and grab anos Root and crush it.
It's not like zepes can go and grab anos Root and crush it.
- 4,814
- 2,694
[
So only type 5 can interact with type 5? What if the character can decide to be type 5 or not willingly and not always existing as type 5?
- 4,814
- 2,694
Which verse is that?
- 4,814
- 2,694
Definitely needs to be nuked. This is basically NLF that isn't NLF
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
Is there any feat for him to be completely free from casualty of the verse or is there even a statement for him being completely free from casualty
- 6,605
- 4,143
I wish I could. Really.
- 4,814
- 2,694
If interacting with type 5 is an anti-feat for said type 5 shouldn't all characters with type 5 and interaction feats be dropped to type 4?
Being completely unbound yet even one person being able to affect you means they're still laws that apply to you.
Acasuality 5 if actually true should be the greatest defensive ability in fiction
Being completely unbound yet even one person being able to affect you means they're still laws that apply to you.
Acasuality 5 if actually true should be the greatest defensive ability in fiction
- 2,298
- 732
TES I believe
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,233
- 12,283
TES???. I'm that verse player, and i don't see it
Sniper670
He/Him- 6,409
- 1,366
I can say the same for Anos. And Rimuru is actually free from causality. As it is a law in the vers3
In fact a crt was made for it and was only rejected because his feats don't back that up, that is, non Aca could interact with him normally
- 6,605
- 4,143
In options iirc. I only use dark mode but Idk how I put it.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
I don't remember Claiming Anos is Acausality type 5. Can you show me where I said that. Also his root never causality haxed and there is a statement literally him being outside of reason. Reason is cause and logic if you don't what is definition of Reason.
Now can you tell where it's stated Rimuru is free from casualty.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
You said Rimuru has statement why did you changed the topic? Also that was already debunked by others not bothered.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
Yes that has been already Debunked in that thread.
- 4,814
- 2,694
There's no point to this. Let someone make a CRT to nuke type 5 aca as someone interacting with you still means there are laws that still apply to you
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,725
- 10,566
There they denied because of MTL and they didn't understand the context. Even I don't understand what they are talking about.
Also Anos statement and that is totally different especially Graham. We were arguing with Venozdonua as reference. It literally whatever the verse can offer. Anyway I think either Acausality type 5 should be nuked or should be specified clearly how they gets it.
- 938
- 326
Doesn't have to be stated transcend tho. I know exactly which character has Acausality Type 5 which is not stated "transcend" causality but is still accepted on this site.
- 938
- 326
Hype up your Acausality Type 4 doesn't mean you have to use the word transcend, proof that they can't be interacted normally is a very important evidence for Acausality Type 5
- 13,724
- 3,668
TES would probably be the only exception. They transcend causality enough for it to be Type 5 and only appear as bound to it because they wish so.
- 6,605
- 4,143
Whuch is not true as far as the standard goes.
- 938
- 326
literally noted on the Acausality page
Transcend causality without supporting evidence/contexts that they can't be interacted normally would just be considered Aca 4, like a characters from Rakudai Kishi verse
