• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Re:Creators Altair and Sirius CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I explained the reasons why they are wrong and I still haven't had a response from them. If then according to them the erasure of existence at a conceptual level, i.e. at a narrative level does not qualify as High-Godly then many characters would have to downgrade the regeneration
 
I would like to chime in and say that while I DO believe that she would get the abilities listed in the OP (High-Godly, Regen & Immortality Neg, and Resis to said neg), however, the premise as well as the evidence provided by the OP, are actually wrong with missing context and information.
If you guys give me some time, I will try to finish my CRT for the verse and address the things listed by the OP along with some more stuff in a different thread.
 
Last edited:
QuasiYuri said:
I disagree with High Godly.

From what I saw, she didn't regenerated her erased concept, she got absorbed and her concept took over Sirius'; which isn't regeneration.
Click to expand...
The concept of her existence continues even after emphasizing that your concept of existence was 0? Technically Altair was absorbed erasing all her existence and concept including her narrative, then she took Sirius at the same time erasing her concept. If technically Altair no longer existed since everything about her was 0, and she was able to take sirius by erasing her, then what is it? She no longer existed when sirius absorbed her.
 
I agree with Everything and DT. This is just seeming like a misunderstanding of wiki mechanics. I don't see anything necessitating High-Godly or the negation aspects.
 
QuasiYuri said:
which isn't regeneration.
Click to expand...
it was accepted as regeneration,even her profile also said that

Regeneration (Mid-Godly; reformed despite being erased from existence by Sirius) (basically this thread was just made to upgrade her regen ability)
Accelerate420 said:
I agree with Everything and DT. This is just seeming like a misunderstanding of wiki mechanics. I don't see anything necessitating High-Godly or the negation aspects.
Click to expand...
Sirius can return from conceptual erasure with immortality type 6+8,however Altair can erase her permanently that's why Altair can negate those type of immortalities
 
If they so reject that being conceptually absorbed/erased from her narrative to the point that Altair's existence was 0 and she was able to regenerate is not High-Godly then everything else beside High-Godly is fine then
 
Delta333 said:
it was accepted as regeneration,even her profile also said that

Regeneration (Mid-Godly; reformed despite being erased from existence by Sirius) (basically this thread was just made to upgrade her regen ability)
Click to expand...
It doesn't really prevent me from explaining how it's not regeneration.

Being absorbed by someone and overtaking them isn't regeneration to begin with.

Even the very proof used prove that it isn't erasure but absorption, and that Altair surviving it isn't regenration.
 
QuasiYuri said:
It doesn't really prevent me from explaining how it's not regeneration.

Being absorbed by someone and overtaking them isn't regeneration to begin with.

Even the very proof used prove that it isn't erasure but absorption, and that Altair surviving it isn't regenration.
Click to expand...
but...her existence coefficient was zero so it's weird when saying that's not being erased
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
I think DT and Everything12 make sense. And Yuri also makes sense regarding the regeneration part.
Click to expand...
Everything12 and Yuri is contradicted each other so idk why both can make sense,I mean one says regeneration is mid godly while other says that's not even regeneration...

About DT,he disagreed with immortality neg but OP removed few of them so that's not a problem,at worst case if high godly regen got rejected the rest can be applied
 
Accelerate420 said:
Hang on-- why is there a vote for agree but no option for disagree? :unsure:
Click to expand...
Literally they haven't disagree and the ones who said disagree haven't explained why, and ofc since mods say that they disagree then that doesn't matter since this will be rejected
 
Dereck03 said:
Literally they haven't disagree and the ones who said disagree haven't explained why, and ofc since mods say that they disagree then that doesn't matter since this will be rejected
Click to expand...
Sounds like you're just arguing in bad faith. This doesn't sound like a fair CRT at all if you weren't even intending to count disagreed votes regardless.

I would recommend next time giving the option so it's easier to keep track of everything, otherwise your intentions might become misconstrued.
 
Delta333 said:
lol but Everything12 agreed with mid godly regen neg so that's not really bad
Click to expand...
Yeah but Yuri is saying that it's not regeneration and Medeus is agreeing with both and then 🤷‍♂️
 
Accelerate420 said:
Sounds like you're just arguing in bad faith. This doesn't sound like a fair CRT at all if you weren't even intending to count disagreed votes regardless.

I would recommend next time giving the option so it's easier to keep track of everything, otherwise your intentions might become misconstrued.
Click to expand...
I think I may have misunderstood, anyway I had not added the disagree because the reason for disagreeing had not been clarified, as some contradict each other.
 
Delta333 said:
If DDM agreed with both then who is wrong lol also if that's not regen then this CRT will turn into a downgrade thread
Click to expand...
Then what's regenerate from her concept of existence was 0, a.k.a she was erased from her entire existence, and holopsicon exerts EE at narrative level? Mid-Godly... Ok 👌
 
Dereck03 said:
I think I may have misunderstood, anyway I had not added the disagree because the reason for disagreeing had not been clarified, as some contradict each other.
Click to expand...

But did you even have it there to begin with? Other people have different reasons for disagreeing so it's better to simply have it there with a note between names on what they disagree with and specify with them. But anyways that's getting off topic and more into ethics.
 
Accelerate420 said:
But did you even have it there to begin with? Other people have different reasons for disagreeing so it's better to simply have it there with a note between names on what they disagree with and specify with them. But anyways that's getting off topic and more into ethics.
Click to expand...
I've added them
 
Resurrection from Existence at 0, with concept erased/absorbed, with her narrative erased by holopsicon
 
That Resurrection = High-Godly
 
Btw her type 3 immortality will be yeeted too lol if that’s not regen feat
Also regen neg will be changed to resurrection neg(kinda weird but idk)
 
Delta333 said:
Btw her type 3 immortality will be yeeted too lol if that’s not regen feat
Also regen neg will be changed to resurrection neg(kinda weird but idk)
Click to expand...
Yeah, since that make sense
 
I think it would be best not to apply the OP's changes and leave everything as is, as another member more knowledgeable than me will do a major CRT on the verse that will include these and more stuffs.
 
Dereck03 said:
Then what's regenerate from her concept of existence was 0, a.k.a she was erased from her entire existence, and holopsicon exerts EE at narrative level? Mid-Godly... Ok 👌
Click to expand...
The scans in the OP flat out says it isn't erasure.

They can't erase her to begin with, so they change her by absorbing/merging her with Sirius.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Anzu_Hanashiro
Altair update new feat
Replies
2
Views
317
Anzu_Hanashiro
Anzu_Hanashiro
RM97
  • Locked
Re:Creators CRT #1
5 6 7
Replies
268
Views
17K
Dereck03
Dereck03
Robo432343
VHD Low Godly Regen for Noble Physiology
Replies
4
Views
533
RM97
RM97
ByArrow
Arrowverse CRT: Low-Godly Regen for Archangels and Limited EE Resistance for Lucifer
Replies
19
Views
1K
ByArrow
ByArrow
RonTheCowardlyDog
Discussion involving Annoying Orange's Regeneration
Replies
9
Views
975
SatellaTheWoE
SatellaTheWoE
Back
Top