- 14,865
- 12,372
I feel like, for this sort of thing, the relative gap (1.1x, 1.5x, 2x, 50x, etc.) is more important than the absolute gap (100 joules, 2 exatons, 940 gigafoe). So I wouldn't discredit scaling up to 3-B any more than scaling up to 8-B.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This, I think.Well, currently we are leaning towards continuing with "common sense, case by case". We just may need to write a clarifications text.
But it seems like it was forgotten about and never added.It is possible for a character who is depicted as vastly superior to another in a statistic to be placed in a tier above the other, given that the other character is close to the the next tier. However, this ultimately needs to be decided through case-by-case analysis.
Well, I appreciate that you are trying to help out. I am just concerned about that drastically changing our approach too much at this point will have a similar effect as a bull in a porcelain shop.I tried to help with a proper guideline, but people generally aren't enthusiastic about it. A no-guidelines approach is nonsensical and will inevitably run in the direction of the highest interpretation being fought for.
But people have fought against me on every turn on this thread no matter option or compromise I try to explore. It's impossible to satisfy everyone, so I can't even try to get a guideline through.
This seems like a good idea to add in any case.I just noticed that from the last thread about this, which reached a similar "common sense, case by case" conclusion, Dargoo suggested adding the following text to the Powerscaling page:
But it seems like it was forgotten about and never added.
NO WHYYYYY!!!!!!Bump
I need this thread to be completed for my plansNO WHYYYYY!!!!!!
That's the thing tho, it will never be completedI need this thread to be completed for my plans
no lmao, the majority agreed on upscaling being vague. There's a guideline from the last thread on some "common sense, case by case" rule text to be added to a relevant page.I thought the majority agreed on that whole 3/4 thing
It is possible for a character who is depicted as vastly superior to another in a statistic to be placed in a tier above the other, given that the other character is close to the the next tier. However, this ultimately needs to be decided through case-by-case analysis.
Sorry for jumping in but I figured it should be fine since this is basically over; he meant where in the Powerscaling page.Maybe the powerscaling page.