- 10,398
- 4,564
We should probably also have a tally of who agrees with what. Since not everyone who agrees with a downgrade, agrees with downgrading the same thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of the Chrono Navigator or Alien X scaling to the Navigator?low 2-C downgrade
We agree with the 2-B downgrade but we are still discussing the 2-C ratingobody agrees with 2-B or 2-C and and the comparisons to other verse just seems in vain
That’s not true at all.Dude are you in drugs? You can't combine reality Warping to survive something since reality Warping ≠ Durability in the first place, what the creator meant is that they need to make a decision to combine theire AP and durability to survive a multiversal AP attack
The former was about Celestialsapiens using reality warping / power nullification to counter the Life absorption hax that make sense yes but the latter was clearly about them combining their AP and durability to survive a multiversal destruction, unless you are arguing that Celestialsapiens does have some kind of power null via reality warping then this should be added on AX profile1 Celestialsapien will die to Vladius’s grip because any living thing that even goes near Anur Vladius automatically dies. No life is allowed on Anur Vladius at all. However if the Celestialsapiens go to Vladius as a big group they nullify it. If it was just strength in numbers and AP they would’ve died as a group. It’s clearly hax dude
Yes? They need to make a decision in order to combine theire AP durability to survive a multiversal attack if you think that it's done via Reality warping (Power Nullification) then Power null should be added on AX profileIf they have to make a decision about it then no.
Then how does it works?also don’t use multipliers like that in tier 2.
Not really. You’re pulling 2-C out of nowhere when even Firestorm said he made a mistake and they’d just be a lower degree of 2-B.We agree with the 2-B downgrade but we are still discussing the 2-C rating
Okay but it seems that Zamasu chan is trying to argue that Celestialsapiens can survive a multiversal destruction as a group via Reality warping (Power Nullification) so IdkNot really. You’re pulling 2-C out of nowhere when even Firestorm said he made a mistake and they’d just be a lower degree of 2-B.
The fact that we’re scaling 1 celestialsapien compared to what an entire race can do.Yes? They need to make a decision in order to combine theire AP durability to survive a multiversal attack if you think that it's done via Reality warping (Power Nullification) then Power null should be added on AX profile
Then how does it works?
No it didnt. Not a single person countered Atomic X scaling and the vast majority here are in agreement that he does scale.So to summarize for a moment:
Atomic-X being low 2-C got yeeted and not countered further.
Im pretty sure Giver and Daddysbrawl gave counter arguments against it after Andy gave input.AX not having 2-B EE got countered by Andy and not further brought up (and should really have it’s own thread if there are still disagreements)
And as said before, I dont agree with this since "Possibly 2-B" wouldnt be coming from this. And to answer your earlier question to me, I did initially have no issue with scaling Alien X's hax above the hax of the weapons, but Zamasu gave a counter-point against this for not being able to scale different abilities.The strongest power statement seems to be where most people have an issue with but Andy said that based on the reality warping being strongest hax argument alone he wouldn’t give Alien X low 2-C but rather Low 2-C, possibly 2-B.
Straight up wrong, Ben was 11 when servantis made that statement.Note that Alien X was literally the exact alien Ben was transformed to in that time. While I’m certain Servantis would use different language, he would probably say something similar had Alien X never existed. That’s because he’s manipulative. He’s manipulating someone to his advantage. If he doesn’t have X, he’d just lie about something else.
Zamasu didn't counter anymore after i argued kai wielding excalibur scaled to maltruant.No it didnt. Not a single person countered Atomic X scaling and the vast majority here are in agreement that he does scale.
Im pretty sure Giver and Daddysbrawl gave counter arguments against it after Andy gave input.
And as said before, I dont agree with this since "Possibly 2-B" wouldnt be coming from this. And to answer your earlier question to me, I did initially have no issue with scaling Alien X's hax above the hax of the weapons, but Zamasu gave a counter-point against this for not being able to scale different abilities.
The ee statement was when ben was 11. Look it up.No? The context doesn’t even match up. Kevin and Ben didn’t even like eachother at that age, and Kevin said something about being a good friend shortly after.
Not really just means he knows about a celestialsapien's abilitiesServantis making that statement when ben was 11 just makes the statement more shaky considering Ben couldn't transform into Alien X at the time.
Yeah..... And? If an entire race can survive an infinite multiversal destruction then a single Celestialsapiens should be either at least 2-C (due to the green Lanterns rating for performing a similar feat) or he should be a lower degree of 2-B like the Green guy explainedThe fact that we’re scaling 1 celestialsapien compared to what an entire race can do.
but for Atomic x case he definitely doesn't scale to Alien x for obvious reasons
^Not a single person countered Atomic X scaling and the vast majority here are in agreement that he does scale.
Just No? , the only argument for Atomic x scaling to Alien x is that "Maltruant did beat Atomic x because the creators doesn't know how to power scale therefore Atomic x scale to Alien x without any proof supporting this"^
I've said it earlier and saying it again. No one here brought a counter argument against Zamasu's point about Atomic-X scaling when doing otherwise makes no sense. The only recent point had to do with Kai and Excalibur and I fail to see what that point amounts to here.
This is being very dishonest as thats not the case at all. The main argument for Atomic-X scaling is him being a blatant fusion of Alien X, which would in turn make him => Alien X. The Maltruant argument is a 2nd supporting point to this.Just No? , the only argument for Atomic x scaling to Alien x is that "Maltruant did beat Atomic x because the creators doesn't know how to power scale therefore Atomic x scale to Alien x without any proof supporting this"
Probably doing that to make a comrpromise when we really shouldnt have to. Atomic-X not scaling is based off a very little basis as opposed to a big basis supporting him scaling.this isn't an enough argument even Zamasu chan argued for "High 5-A possibly low 2-C " for Atomic X case not only to mention that the creator statements are still a supporting evidence for that
Yeah he is a fusion of Alien x but that doesn't mean he is stronger then Alien X while the visual feats alone shows otherwise, I mean this is literally a fusion between a character "A" and a Character "B" (who is infinitely weaker then the Character "A") , I'm pretty you need feats to say that the fusion between them would make them even above the Character "A" (since it's basically like a character"A" with a PL=1000 making a fusion with a character "B" with a PL=0,1 then in the end you get a character with a PL=100)This is being very dishonest as thats not the case at all. The main argument for Atomic-X scaling is him being a blatant fusion of Alien X,
I'm not saying that Zamasu arguments are completely wrong but I'm just saying that those arguments aren't enough.And im not seeing how them powerscaling badly means Zamasu's argument is wrong.
He did a compromise because many people disagree with this, Atomic x not scaling is based on pure visual feats and credible writers statementsProbably doing that to make a comrpromise when we really shouldnt have to. Atomic-X not scaling is based off a very little basis as opposed to a big basis supporting him scaling
A. Because Celestialsapiens are ruled by the same government so their powers are common knowledge + he’s a superngenius + Servantis outright states that Ben proved that he is the threat he made him out to be. Also Servantis IS part of the Cosmic authorities (unless you're solely talking about the Celestialsapiens as in beings who have cosmic power and are also part of the authorities, who probably won't care since I assume Azmuth got that CS DNA willingly), that's the entire point on why he sees it as his mission to take down Ben.What’s more likely?
A: Servantis knowing of the powers of a being existing outside Time and Space, enough to create a rough measurement of their abilities, rivaling the intellect of a character who spent millions of years outside of time studying things like this, all before a Celestialsapien had even displayed such feats of power publicly (In fact, no Celestialsapien has even thought of using EE in the show, even when offended) , and instead of informing- I don’t know, the Cosmic authorities?- he takes matters into his own hands and tells an 11 year old child to take him down.
B: He was simply lying and exaggerating to manipulate gullible people into taking his side.
^ ThisAtomic x not scaling is based on pure visual feats and credible writers statements
Maltruant > Atomic-X. If Atomic-X is low 2-C then so is Maltruant.ProfessorKukui4Life said:
^
I've said it earlier and saying it again. No one here brought a counter argument against Zamasu's point about Atomic-X scaling when doing otherwise makes no sense. The only recent point had to do with Kai and Excalibur and I fail to see what that point amounts to here.